Gastric Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Gastric Cancer Sentinel Lymph Node Sampling: Refining Patient Selection for Organ Sparing Resection of Early Gastric Cancer in a North American Context
Gastric cancer has an incidence in North America of over 24,000 new cases annually, of which
approximately 15% are diagnosed at an early stage. Standard of care for early gastric cancer
(EGC) treatment has historically included anatomical resection with regional lymphadenectomy.
However, with the recent emergence of organ-sparing techniques, select patients with a very
low risk of lymph node metastases are able to avoid anatomical resection and its inherent
short and long term consequences. Despite this advance, EGC patients with high risk features
continue to require anatomical resection to achieve adequate lymph node staging, despite the
fact that 75-95% of these patients ultimately are found to have node negative disease. Due to
the inadequacy of standard imaging modalities to reliably detect nodal metastases in EGC
patients, sentinel lymph node sampling for gastric cancer was developed using principals
similar to those used broadly for breast and melanoma patients. Early reports from Asia
suggest this technique has very high success rates, accuracy and sensitivity, however it has
never been verified in a North American context. This study aims to test SLN sampling for
North American gastric cancer patients at a high volume regional treatment centre, with an
aim to expand the application of organ sparing resection to EGC patients.
This project aims to determine the sensitivity and accuracy of sentinel lymph node sampling
for early gastric cancer patients at a high volume, North American, tertiary care centre.
Gastric cancer incidence in North America is 7.4/100,000 population, with 24,590 new cases
diagnosed annually in the United States1. Of these, approximately 15% are detected at the
early gastric cancer stage with no spread to regional lymph nodes2. Recent advances in
gastric cancer detection, such as endoscopic use of narrow band imaging and magnification
endoscopy, can help improve the detection rate of early lesions3-5. Gastric cancers detected
at an early stage have an excellent prognosis, with reported long term overall survival rates
of 71-92%6-9 due to the low rate of peritoneal and distant metastatic spread which frequently
occur in patients with more advanced lesions. However, the mainstay of treatment even for
early gastric cancers (EGC) remains anatomical resection with regional lymphadenectomy. While
oncologically sound, anatomical resection is often associated with complications and
unpleasant short and long-term side effects, including post-operative weight loss, dumping
syndrome, vitamin deficiencies, anastomotic complications, delayed gastric emptying, and bile
reflux, among others. Given the long life expectancy of patients after resection of EGC,
curative resection with organ preservation to improve post-operative quality of life should
be a treatment goal.
Recently, organ-sparing techniques have emerged which allow select early gastric cancers to
be treated without anatomical resection. These techniques, including endoscopic mucosal
resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), allow for curative resection of
highly-selected lesions with complete organ preservation. The shortcoming of all organ
sparing resection techniques presently is that lymphadenectomy is not performed, leading some
patients to perhaps be under-staged and therefore under-treated.
According to the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines10, early lesions are deemed
appropriate for organ-sparing endoscopic resection if they meet the following criteria:
confined to the mucosa (T1a), tumour size <2cm, no ulceration, and well-differentiated tumour
grade. Together, tumours with these features have a very low risk of lymph node metastases
(<1%). Long-term outcomes of ESD are highly favorable, with local recurrence and overall
survival rates comparable to anatomical resection7,8. For tumours that do not meet the above
criteria however, risk of lymph node involvement is drastically increased, with submucosal
invasion, ulceration, tumour size >3cm, poorly differentiated tumour type, and lymphovascular
invasion conferring a risk of lymphatic metastases of 4-26%11. For this reason, current best
practices recommend EGCs with high risk features continue to undergo anatomical resection
with regional lymphadenectomy. However 75-95% of such patients will ultimately have no
regional metastases on final pathological analysis, suggesting they could have been spared
anatomical resection if only their lymph node basins had been definitively staged prior to
surgery.
Presently, several imaging modalities are available to characterize lymph node stage for
gastric cancer, including endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and positron
emission tomography (PET). Unfortunately, the sensitivity of these modalities is woefully
inadequate to accurately predict microscopic lymph node metastases, and therefore they cannot
be reliably used to differentiate high risk EGCs that require anatomical resection and
lymphadenectomy from those amenable to organ-sparing resection12-15.
To address this gap in the ability to accurately detect nodal metastases in early gastric
cancer, sentinel lymph node (SNL) sampling was pioneered in Asia and has undergone refinement
and study there since the early 2000s. A recent multi-institutional study of 397 patients
conducted across 12 centres in Japan reported rates of SLN detection of 97.5% and accuracy of
SLN stage when compared to post-resection stage of 99%16. These numbers rival those reported
for SLN biopsy of breast and melanoma cancers in large randomized controlled trials17,18.
Indeed, for these tumour types, SLN biopsy is now the standard of care globally for staging
clinically node-negative patients due to its diagnostic superiority over other staging
modalities. Following the success of SLN sampling in gastric cancer, select Asian
institutions are now applying this technique to diverting sentinel node-negative (SLN -ve) T1
and T2 gastric cancer patients away from anatomical resection with extensive lymphadenectomy
and towards organ-sparing endoscopic or wedge resection.
The Upper GI Oncology Program at the McGill University Health Centre sees approximately 80
gastric cancer patients per year, in whom SLN sampling has the potential to inform resection
decisions ~25-30%. Currently, the program performs 15-20 ESDs annually for both early
esophageal and gastric lesions, and approximately 30-40 anatomical resections are performed
in node-negative gastric and esophageal cancer patients per year. Implementation of the
gastric SNL sampling technique would enable expansion of the ESD program to offer
organ-sparing curative resections to EGC patients who presently can only be offered
anatomical resection.
The purpose of this study is to determine the utility and feasibility of SLN sampling for
gastric cancer in a North American context.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05551416 -
The EpiGASTRIC/EDGAR Project: New Strategies for the Early Detection and Prevention of Gastric Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT05518929 -
Hypoxia During Gastroenterological Endoscope Procedures Sedated With Ciprofol In Overweight Or Obesity Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03219593 -
Apatinib as the First-Line Therapy in Elderly Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05489211 -
Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05536102 -
The Effectiveness and Safety of XELOX and Tislelizumab + PLD for Resectable Gastric Cancer (LidingStudy)
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06010862 -
Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05415098 -
Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy of APG-5918 in Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04082364 -
Combination Margetuximab, Retifanlimab, Tebotelimab, and Chemotherapy Phase 2/3 Trial in HER2+ Gastric/GEJ Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03766607 -
Trastuzumab Beyond Progression in HER2 Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01924533 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of Olaparib in Combination With Paclitaxel to Treat Advanced Gastric Cancer.
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01641939 -
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Taxane in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05107674 -
A Study of NX-1607 in Adults With Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04908813 -
Study of HLX22 in Combanition With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Versus Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04249739 -
Pembrolizumab + Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (CapeOx) -HER2 Nagative and Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab + Cisplatin/Capecitabine HER2 Positive
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05514158 -
To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Disitamab Vedotin Combined With RC98 in the Treatment of Subjects With HER2-expressing Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer (Including AEG)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04931654 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03175224 -
APL-101 Study of Subjects With NSCLC With c-Met EXON 14 Skip Mutations and c-Met Dysregulation Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 |