Gastric Cancer Clinical Trial
— CLASS02-01Official title:
Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Clinical Trial For Comparison Of Safety Between Laparoscopic And Open Total Gastrectomy In Patients With Clinical Stage I Gastric Cancer
Verified date | February 2019 |
Source | Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This CLASS02-01 trial is a prospective, multicenter trial for laparoscopic total gastrectomy (LTG) and open total gastrectomy (OTG) in patients with clinical stage I (T1N0M0、T1N1M0、T2N0M0) gastric cancer. The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the early operative morbidity and mortality and determine the safety of LTG compared with OTG for clinical stage I gastric adenocarcinoma. The second purpose is to evaluate the recovery course and compare the postoperative hospital stay of the patients enrolled in this study.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 227 |
Est. completion date | October 24, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | October 24, 2018 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 75 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: 1. Aged 18-75 years; 2. Primary lesion is pathologically diagnosed as gastric adenocarcinoma, such as papillary adenocarcinoma, tubular adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, poorly cohesive carcinoma (including signet ring cell carcinoma and other variants), and mixed adenocarcinoma; 3. Clinical stage IA (T1N0M0) or IB (T1N1M0, T2N0M0) (According to AJCC-7th TNM staging system); 4. Tumor located in the upper or middle third of the stomach, and curative resection is expected to be achievable by total gastrectomy with D1+/D2-10 lymphadenectomy (also apply to multiple primary cancers); 5. No invasion to Z-line; 6. BMI (Body Mass Index) < 30 kg/m2; 7. No history of upper abdominal surgery (except for laparoscopic cholecystectomy); 8. No prior treatment of chemotherapy, radiotherapy, targeted therapy, immunotherapy, etc.; 9. No enlargement of splenic hilar lymph nodes; 10. Preoperative performance status (ECOG,Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group) of 0 or 1; 11. Preoperative ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) scoring: I-III; 12. Sufficient organ functions; 13. Written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Preoperative examinations indicate that the stage of the disease is stage II/III/IV; 2. Preoperative examination indicate enlargement of perigastric or retroperitoneal lymph nodes (min diameter=1.0cm); 3. Women during pregnancy or breast-feeding; 4. Synchronous or metachronous (within 5 years) malignancies; 5. Body temperature = 38? before surgery or infectious disease with a systemic therapy indicated; 6. Severe mental disease; 7. Severe respiratory disease; 8. Severe hepatic and renal dysfunction; 9. Unstable angina pectoris or history of myocardial infarction within 6 months; 10. History of cerebral infarction or cerebral hemorrhage within 6 months; 11. Continuous systemic steroid therapy within 1 month (except for topical use); 12. Gastric cancer complications (bleeding, perforation, obstruction) that requiring emergency surgery; 13. Patients are participating or have participated in another clinical trial (within 6 months). |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
China | ZhongShan hospital FuDan university | Shanghai | Shanghai |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Shanghai Zhongshan Hospital |
China,
Byun C, Han SU. Current status of randomized controlled trials for laparoscopic gastric surgery for gastric cancer in Korea. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 May;8(2):130-8. doi: 10.1111/ases.12176. Epub 2015 Mar 5. Review. — View Citation
Chen K, Xu XW, Zhang RC, Pan Y, Wu D, Mou YP. Systematic review and meta-analysis of laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Aug 28;19(32):5365-76. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i32.5365. Review. — View Citation
Chen W, Zheng R, Baade PD, Zhang S, Zeng H, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Cancer statistics in China, 2015. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Mar-Apr;66(2):115-32. doi: 10.3322/caac.21338. Epub 2016 Jan 25. — View Citation
Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. — View Citation
Hu Y, Huang C, Sun Y, Su X, Cao H, Hu J, Xue Y, Suo J, Tao K, He X, Wei H, Ying M, Hu W, Du X, Chen P, Liu H, Zheng C, Liu F, Yu J, Li Z, Zhao G, Chen X, Wang K, Li P, Xing J, Li G. Morbidity and Mortality of Laparoscopic Versus Open D2 Distal Gastrectomy for Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 20;34(12):1350-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.7215. Epub 2016 Feb 22. — View Citation
Huang CM, Zhang JR, Zheng CH, Li P, Xie JW, Wang JB, Lin JX, Lu J, Chen QY. A 346 case analysis for laparoscopic spleen-preserving no.10 lymph node dissection for proximal gastric cancer: a single center study. PLoS One. 2014 Sep 29;9(9):e108480. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108480. eCollection 2014. — View Citation
Hur H, Lee HY, Lee HJ, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Park YK, Kim W, Han SU. Efficacy of laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy for locally advanced gastric cancer: the protocol of the KLASS-02 multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Cancer. 2015 May 5;15:355. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1365-z. — View Citation
Inaki N, Etoh T, Ohyama T, Uchiyama K, Katada N, Koeda K, Yoshida K, Takagane A, Kojima K, Sakuramoto S, Shiraishi N, Kitano S. A Multi-institutional, Prospective, Phase II Feasibility Study of Laparoscopy-Assisted Distal Gastrectomy with D2 Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer (JLSSG0901). World J Surg. 2015 Nov;39(11):2734-41. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3160-z. — View Citation
Jeong O, Ryu SY, Choi WY, Piao Z, Park YK. Risk factors and learning curve associated with postoperative morbidity of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Sep;21(9):2994-3001. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3666-x. Epub 2014 Apr 1. — View Citation
Jung DH, Son SY, Park YS, Shin DJ, Ahn HS, Ahn SH, Park DJ, Kim HH. The learning curve associated with laparoscopic total gastrectomy. Gastric Cancer. 2016 Jan;19(1):264-72. doi: 10.1007/s10120-014-0447-y. Epub 2014 Dec 7. — View Citation
Katai H. Current status of a randomized controlled trial examining laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer in Japan. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2015 May;8(2):125-9. doi: 10.1111/ases.12171. Epub 2015 Feb 10. Review. — View Citation
Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH; Korean Laparoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Prospective randomized controlled trial (phase III) to comparing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy with open distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma (KLASS 01). J Korean Surg Soc. 2013 Feb;84(2):123-30. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2013.84.2.123. Epub 2013 Jan 29. — View Citation
Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Kim W, Lee HJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Song KY, Ryu SY. Long-term results of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a large-scale case-control and case-matched Korean multicenter study. J Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar 1;32(7):627-33. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.48.8551. Epub 2014 Jan 27. — View Citation
Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, Ryu SW, Lee HJ, Song KY. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report--a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized Trial (KLASS Trial). Ann Surg. 2010 Mar;251(3):417-20. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181cc8f6b. — View Citation
Kim HI, Hur H, Kim YN, Lee HJ, Kim MC, Han SU, Hyung WJ. Standardization of D2 lymphadenectomy and surgical quality control (KLASS-02-QC): a prospective, observational, multicenter study [NCT01283893]. BMC Cancer. 2014 Mar 19;14:209. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-209. — View Citation
Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Cho GS, Kim CY, Yang HK, Park DJ, Song KY, Lee SI, Ryu SY, Lee JH, Lee HJ; Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group. Decreased Morbidity of Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy Compared With Open Distal Gastrectomy for Stage I Gastric Cancer: Short-term Outcomes From a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016 Jan;263(1):28-35. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000001346. — View Citation
Kurokawa Y, Katai H, Fukuda H, Sasako M; Gastric Cancer Surgical Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. Phase II study of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG0703. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2008 Jul;38(7):501-3. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hyn055. Epub 2008 Jun 26. — View Citation
Lee JH, Nam BH, Ryu KW, Ryu SY, Park YK, Kim S, Kim YW. Comparison of outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted and open total gastrectomy for early gastric cancer. Br J Surg. 2015 Nov;102(12):1500-5. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9902. Epub 2015 Sep 23. — View Citation
Nakamura K, Katai H, Mizusawa J, Yoshikawa T, Ando M, Terashima M, Ito S, Takagi M, Takagane A, Ninomiya M, Fukushima N, Sasako M. A phase III study of laparoscopy-assisted versus open distal gastrectomy with nodal dissection for clinical stage IA/IB gastric Cancer (JCOG0912). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2013 Mar;43(3):324-7. doi: 10.1093/jjco/hys220. Epub 2012 Dec 28. — View Citation
Villanueva MT. Gastric cancer: a master KLASS in laparoscopic gastrectomy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Mar;11(3):119. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2014.18. Epub 2014 Feb 11. — View Citation
Wada N, Kurokawa Y, Takiguchi S, Takahashi T, Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Nakajima K, Mori M, Doki Y. Feasibility of laparoscopy-assisted total gastrectomy in patients with clinical stage I gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2014 Jan;17(1):137-40. doi: 10.1007/s10120-013-0235-0. Epub 2013 Feb 22. — View Citation
* Note: There are 21 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Early operative morbidity and mortality rate | The early operative morbidity and mortality are defined as the event observed within 30 days following surgery, including intraoperative and postoperative complications and/or death. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Postoperative recovery course | Time to first ambulation, flatus, liquid diet, and soft diet are used to assess the postoperative recovery course, which is a composite outcome measure. | 30 days | |
Secondary | Postoperative hospital stay | The length of postoperative hospital stay will be recorded. | 30 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05551416 -
The EpiGASTRIC/EDGAR Project: New Strategies for the Early Detection and Prevention of Gastric Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT05518929 -
Hypoxia During Gastroenterological Endoscope Procedures Sedated With Ciprofol In Overweight Or Obesity Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03219593 -
Apatinib as the First-Line Therapy in Elderly Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05489211 -
Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05536102 -
The Effectiveness and Safety of XELOX and Tislelizumab + PLD for Resectable Gastric Cancer (LidingStudy)
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06010862 -
Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05415098 -
Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy of APG-5918 in Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04082364 -
Combination Margetuximab, Retifanlimab, Tebotelimab, and Chemotherapy Phase 2/3 Trial in HER2+ Gastric/GEJ Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03766607 -
Trastuzumab Beyond Progression in HER2 Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01924533 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of Olaparib in Combination With Paclitaxel to Treat Advanced Gastric Cancer.
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01641939 -
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Taxane in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05107674 -
A Study of NX-1607 in Adults With Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04908813 -
Study of HLX22 in Combanition With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Versus Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04249739 -
Pembrolizumab + Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (CapeOx) -HER2 Nagative and Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab + Cisplatin/Capecitabine HER2 Positive
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05514158 -
To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Disitamab Vedotin Combined With RC98 in the Treatment of Subjects With HER2-expressing Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer (Including AEG)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04931654 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03175224 -
APL-101 Study of Subjects With NSCLC With c-Met EXON 14 Skip Mutations and c-Met Dysregulation Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 |