Gastric Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Neoadjuvant Therapy of Gastric Cancer With Irinotecan, Cisplatin and Cetuximab Followed by Surgical Resection and Adjuvant Chemoradiation
This study intends to evaluate the feasibility and treatment efficacy of adding an antibody blocking the epidermal growth factor (EGF) pathway to a neoadjuvant approach with proven efficacy developed at New York University.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 30 |
Est. completion date | October 2015 |
Est. primary completion date | September 2011 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients must have signed an approved informed consent. - must have histologically documented untreated gastric/GEJ carcinoma (clinical stage T3 N0 or T4, or any T with N1-N3 M0) - Patients with tumor tissue available for assessment of EGF receptor status by immuno-histochemistry (IHC). - Patients with Performance Status 0-2. - Patients, 18 years and older, must either be not of child bearing potential or have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days of treatment. Patients are considered not of child bearing potential if they are surgically sterile (they have undergone a hysterectomy, bilateral tubal ligation, or bilateral oophorectomy) or they are postmenopausal. - Bone marrow function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) at least 1,500/ul; platelets at least 100,000/ul. - Renal function: creatinine not greater than 1.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (ULN). - The PT and PTT should be within the range of normal values - Hepatic function: bilirubin not greater than 1.5 x ULN; aspartate aminotransferase (AST) not greater than 2.5 x ULN. Exclusion Criteria: - Acute hepatitis or known HIV. - Active or uncontrolled infection. - Significant history of uncontrolled cardiac disease; i.e., uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, and congestive heart failure. - Prior therapy that affects or targets the EGF pathway. - Prior allergic reaction to chimerized or murine monoclonal antibody therapy or documented presence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA). - Any concurrent chemotherapy not indicated in the study protocol or any other investigational agent(s). |
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | NYU Cancer Center | New York | New York |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
New York University School of Medicine | Bristol-Myers Squibb, ImClone LLC |
United States,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Clinical Response Rate of an Induction Regimen Consisting of Irinotecan, Cisplatin and Cetuximab | Clinical response rate is defined as the percentage of patients who responded to the induction regimen. The response is determined based on endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) staging pre-treatment and post-treatment, CT scans pre- and post- operatively, and initial clinical stage (based on these tests) compared with the pathologic stage. Any "down-staging" of T or N stage is considered to be a result of induction therapy and counted as a clinical response. | 4 months from the beginning of the induction regimen | No |
Secondary | Rate of Clearance of Nodal Involvement Among Patients Who Have Received the Induction Therapy | This is defined as the percentage of patients whose nodal involvement of cancer has been cleared based on surgery results. | 4 months from the beginning of the induction treatment | No |
Secondary | Rate of Potentially Curative Surgery | This is defined as the percentage of patients who underwent curative surgery (surgery to remove all cancerous tissue). | 4 months from the beginning of the induction treatment | No |
Secondary | Rate of "Down-staging" From Pre-operative Clinical Staging | This is defined as the percentage of patients who had a reduction from T3/T4 disease. | 4 months from the beginning of the induction treatment | No |
Secondary | Safety of the Induction Regimen | This describes the number of patients who experienced grade 3 and higher adverse events related to the regimen. | 4 months from the beginning of the induction | Yes |
Secondary | Median Overall Survival (Induction Treatment and Curative Surgery) | This is the length of time from the start of treatment that half of the patients are still alive. | up to 5 years | No |
Secondary | Median Overall Survival (Adjuvant Therpary) | This is the length of time from the start of treatment that half of the patients are still alive. | up to 5 years | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05551416 -
The EpiGASTRIC/EDGAR Project: New Strategies for the Early Detection and Prevention of Gastric Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT05518929 -
Hypoxia During Gastroenterological Endoscope Procedures Sedated With Ciprofol In Overweight Or Obesity Patients
|
Phase 4 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06006390 -
CEA Targeting Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Lymphocytes (CAR-T) in the Treatment of CEA Positive Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03219593 -
Apatinib as the First-Line Therapy in Elderly Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05489211 -
Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03)
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05536102 -
The Effectiveness and Safety of XELOX and Tislelizumab + PLD for Resectable Gastric Cancer (LidingStudy)
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03170960 -
Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06010862 -
Clinical Study of CEA-targeted CAR-T Therapy for CEA-positive Advanced/Metastatic Malignant Solid Tumors
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05415098 -
Study of Safety, Pharmacokinetic and Efficacy of APG-5918 in Advanced Solid Tumors or Lymphomas
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04082364 -
Combination Margetuximab, Retifanlimab, Tebotelimab, and Chemotherapy Phase 2/3 Trial in HER2+ Gastric/GEJ Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03766607 -
Trastuzumab Beyond Progression in HER2 Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04118114 -
Phase II Study of PRL3-ZUMAB in Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01924533 -
Efficacy and Safety Study of Olaparib in Combination With Paclitaxel to Treat Advanced Gastric Cancer.
|
Phase 3 | |
Terminated |
NCT01641939 -
A Study of Trastuzumab Emtansine Versus Taxane in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05107674 -
A Study of NX-1607 in Adults With Advanced Malignancies
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04908813 -
Study of HLX22 in Combanition With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy Versus Placebo in Combination With Trastuzumab and Chemotherapy for Treatment of Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer
|
Phase 2 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04249739 -
Pembrolizumab + Capecitabine/Oxaliplatin (CapeOx) -HER2 Nagative and Pembrolizumab + Trastuzumab + Cisplatin/Capecitabine HER2 Positive
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05514158 -
To Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics and Preliminary Efficacy of Disitamab Vedotin Combined With RC98 in the Treatment of Subjects With HER2-expressing Locally Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer (Including AEG)
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT04931654 -
A Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of AZD7789 in Participants With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Cancer
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03175224 -
APL-101 Study of Subjects With NSCLC With c-Met EXON 14 Skip Mutations and c-Met Dysregulation Advanced Solid Tumors
|
Phase 2 |