View clinical trials related to Gastrectomy.
Filter by:Major abdominal surgeries are traditionally performed via laparotomy. Analgesia is routinely administered during the postoperative period. The goal is to investigate the effects of laparotomy and analgesia methods on diaphragm function.
This trial evaluates the effects (e.g. on quality of life, weight) of NORTASE® compared to standard care of patients who have undergone gastrectomy.
NeoRacing is a randomized phase II trial carried out at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) in China. The study can be divided into the screening stage, treatment stage and follow-up stage. The enrolled patients will receive perioperative SOX chemotherapy, PD-1 antibody (sintilimab) and radical surgery, with or without preoperative CRT. The patients were randomized by stratified permutated block randomization on a web-based system . The status of peritoneal cytological examination (CY0 vs. CY1) was the stratification factor. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of FUSCC. All patients provided written informed consent before recruitment. Monitoring will be carried out in this tri
Radical gastrectomy has been known as the most effective treatment of curable gastric cancer.However, there is a high risk of malnutrition and weight loss after a gastrectomy which may be attributed to inadequate oral consumption, malabsorption and loss of the reservoir function of the stomach.Weight loss has been regarded as an independent risk factor for postoperative mortality and morbidity and It is also closely associated with a quality of life after surgery. No specific surgical technique has been proved to be effective in reducing postoperative weight loss and it seems like that dietary education and consultation is the best way to minimize weight loss in gastrectomy patients in clinical setting. In this regard, the investigators performed a retrospective pilot study to identify the effect of routinely performed (simplified) dietary education on nutritional status after gastrectomy, but it revealed that the effect of simplified dietary education on weight loss was not clear and the result implies that more intensive dietary education may be necessary after gastrectomy. The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) is to elucidate the effect of intensive dietary education on nutritional status after gastrectomy in comparison with simplified dietary education.
- If a patient undergoes gastrectomy, which is a kind of major abdominal operation, he/she loses more than 5% of his/her body weight in 2 months after surgery. This point is one of the criteria of 'risk of malnutrition' according to Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS 2002) and the patient who corresponds to this criterion needs nutritional support. - According to Nutrition Risk Screening (NRS 2002), moderate malnutrition is defined as the state that the patient orally intakes 25~50% of recommended requirements; severe malnutrition is less than 25%. - Meanwhile, when oral nutrition support was provided to patients after gastric cancer surgery, the patients' average daily intake during the first three months was about a half of the recommended requirements. - Putting together the facts i) that the patient underwent major abdominal operation, ii) that the weight loss rate exceeded 5% for two months, iii) that the average daily intake of patients during the first three months was about half of the recommended amount, the patients are eligible to be classified as a group who require nutritional support according to NRS 2002. Therefore, it is intended to verify the efficacy and safety of supplemental parenteral nutrition by comparing Arm A, who are provided oral intake with supplemental parenteral nutrition, Arm B, who are provided oral intake only after curative gastric cancer surgery.
Reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy has been adopted in clinical. The safety and outcome of reduced port laparoscopic gastrectomy has not been systematically evaluated. The investigators sought to compare the short and long-term outcome of patients with gastric cancer who underwent reduced port gastrectomy with patients underwent traditional laparoscopic gastrectomy
The purpose of this study is to explore the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic spleen-preserving No. 10 lymph node dissection for patients with advanced middle or upper third gastric cancer.
Bariatric surgery procedures promote weight loss by limiting the amount of food consumed through reduction of the size of the stomach and by decreasing absorption of nutrients through reorganizing or bypassing portions of the small intestine. Among the procedures used to induce weight loss, sleeve gastrectomy (SG) was initially developed in the early 90's as the restrictive component of a biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS). It was then offered by laparoscopy as a staged-approach in order to reduce peri-operative complications in high-risk patients. The second step of the surgery (i.e. the duodenal switch) was planned when sufficient weight loss had been obtained. However, it was observed that some patients experienced appreciable weight loss with the SG alone, and did not require a second-stage surgery, thus avoiding the side-effects of a malabsorptive surgery. This led to the surge in popularity of SG as a stand-alone operation, because of its relative technical simplicity, feasibility, and good outcomes. Multiple mechanisms have been postulated to induce metabolic recovery and weight loss following surgery. The independent effects of each component of the BPD-DS with SG have never been investigated in humans within a well-controlled study design. The general objective of the present project is to assess the impact of each component of the BPD-DS and SG, either combined of separated, on physiological variables potentially responsible for metabolic recovery. Patients will be randomized to undergo one of three surgical sequences: 1) SG followed by BPD-DS one year later; 2) BPD-DS followed by SG one year later; or 3) SG and BPD-DS within a single operation. A series of tests will be performed at baseline, at 1 year, and 2 years after the initial surgery. We propose two Specific Aims to asses 1) the impact of each surgical component on the hormonal determinants of metabolic recovery; and 2) the impact of weight loss responses on subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue function improvements. This project will help better understand the mechanisms underlying metabolic recovery following weight loss surgery.
Favorable effects of bariatric surgery have been demonstrated in particular regarding increased insulin sensitivity, decreased blood pressure, improved blood lipids and decreased cardiovascular risk. After surgery, weight loss also leads to improvement of the chronic inflammatory state related to obesity, a strong predictor of the metabolic status. Although obese patients are often affected with type 2 diabetes and hypertension, both related to renal impairment, the existence of a distinct mechanism by which obesity would cause chronic renal insufficiency has been suggested. The mechanisms underlying obesity-related nephropathy have been proposed to involve hyperfiltration, expansion of mesangial cells, hyperperfusion leading to proteinuria and glomerulosclerosis, as noted in obese dogs. In humans, improvements in renal function may be observed following bariatric surgery, although some reported a possibility of increased nephrolithiases. Whether biliopancreatic diversion and gastrectomy alone have similar effects is uncertain. More prospective studies are needed to assess the impact of all types of weight loss surgery to reverse chronic renal insufficiency. The objective of this study is to document changes in microalbuminuria and metabolic parameters in patients with altered renal function undergoing bariatric surgery. Patients enrolled in the study will show renal function impairment as demonstrated by albumin/creatinine ratio alterations in 2 out of 3 measurements taking place before surgery. We will perform a prospective study of renal function markers (albumin/creatinine ratio) and metabolic parameters (blood lipids, glucose, insulin, inflammatory markers) before and 6, 12, 24 months after surgery in patients with microalbuminuria at study onset (albumin/creatinine ratio 2.0-20.0 mg/mmol in men and 2.8-28.0 mg/mmol in women). Data will be analysed with repeated measures analyses in both subgroup. Thereafter, a linear regression model will be created to adjust for potentially confounding factors such as hypertension and diabetes. We hypothesize that patients with severe obesity and altered renal function, whether they are diabetic or not, have improved microalbuminuria and metabolic parameters following biliopancreatic diversion with sleeve gastrectomy or sleeve gastrectomy alone. The extent of renal function recovery will correlate directly with metabolic improvements.
Clinically, combining epidural with general anaesthesia may confer many advantages to patients undergoing major thoracic, abdominal or orthopaedic surgery. Epidural anaesthesia can attenuate sympathetic hyperactivity and the stress response, maintain bowel peristalsis, spare the use of opioids, and facilitate postoperative feeding and physiotherapy. However, establishing epidural anesthesia is not without risks and contraindications, including refusal by the patient, technical failure, unintentional dural puncture, waist and back pain and local anaesthetic toxicity. When neurologic complications do occur, the resulting morbidity and mortality is considerable. Dexmedetomidine is a potent α2-adrenoceptor agonist with an 8 times greater affinity for α2-adrenoceptors than clonidine. This class of agent is known to have sedative, anxiolytic, anti-shivering, analgesic, and anaesthetic sparing effect. In addition α2-adrenoceptor agonists reduce central sympathetic outflow and attenuate the stress response associated with surgery.1 Unlike epidural anaesthesia, dexmedetomidine is easy to administer and no potential for neurological damage. The investigators hypothesize that the dexmedetomidine reduces the stress response of surgery to the similar extent to epidural anaesthesia when used in conjunction with a standard general anaesthesia for abdominal surgery.