Foot Injury Clinical Trial
Official title:
Comparing the Effectiveness of Computer-aided-design Computer-aided-manufacture (CAD/CAM) Insoles Manufactured From Foam-box Cast vs Direct Scan on Patient Reported Outcome Measures: A Double-blinded, Randomised Controlled Trial
The main purpose of this study is to find out if scanning the foot using a 3D scanner influences the effectiveness of custom made insoles, compared to the more traditional approach of taking a foam-box impression cast of the foot. Both of these methods are currently used as standard care in the NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GGC) Orthotic Department. In this study, insoles will be manufactured either from a direct 3D scan of the foot, or from a foam-box impression cast, and a series of questionnaires will be used to measure any changes in foot pain and foot function. The results from this study will be used to develop an information resource for both patients and Orthotists which will fill gaps in our current knowledge and hopefully guide us further in providing the best possible care for future patients who require insoles.
A single centre, double blinded, randomised controlled trial. Interventional, equivalence Trial design. Participants will be asked to attend 2 face-to-face appointments for assessing and fitting of insoles, which is standard practice in the NHS GGC Orthotic Department. Each face-to-face appointment will take approximately 40 minutes. Following the fitting of the insoles, participants will be asked to participate in 3 telephone calls over 12-weeks, during which they will be asked to answer questions from two questionnaires (the "Foot Health Status Questionnaire", and the "Orthotic and Prosthetic User Survey"). Each telephone appointment will take approximately 15 minutes. Once participants receive their insoles, they will also be asked to keep a diary detailing the number of hours that they wore the insoles each day over 12-weeks. This information will be collected by the Orthotist involved with the trial during the telephone review appointments. ;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05555459 -
Performance and Safety Evaluation of Inion CompressOn Screw in Foot and Ankle Surgeries. PMCF Investigation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06086418 -
Perineural Dexamethasone on the Duration of Popliteal Nerve Block for Anesthesia After Pediatric Ankle Surgery
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05762588 -
JuggerKnot With Broadband PMCF Study
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02953067 -
Study of Treatment of Lisfranc Injuries
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06352788 -
From Opinion to Evidence: Multi-site Evaluation of Custom Dynamic Orthosis Best Practices
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02645097 -
Ideal Anatomic Location for Saphenous Nerve Blocks: A Prospective Clinical Evaluation
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05190159 -
Monster Screw System Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06242002 -
Early Post-operative Monitoring by Sensor of Patients Undergoing Forefoot Surgery
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04967040 -
Reconstruction of Ankle and Foot Defects
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02643524 -
Weight Change With Controlled Ankle Movement (CAM) Walker Boot Use
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06300671 -
The Effect of Subtalar Joint Pronation Amount on Lower Extremity Alignment and Performance
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05323773 -
How is Calf Muscle Endurance Related to Ankle Injuries in TeamGym Athletes?
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06304324 -
Dexmedetomidine vs Dexamethasone in Popliteal Nerve Block
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT05090059 -
Myofascial Points Treatment With Focused Extracorporeal Shock Waves (ESW)
|
N/A |