View clinical trials related to Flushing.
Filter by:Hot flashes, vasomotor symptoms that affect many postmenopausal women, are associated with cardiovascular disease and endothelial dysfunction. Estrogen therapy, associated or not with progestogens, is the standard treatment for vasomotor symptoms and improves the endothelial function of postmenopausal women with hot flushes, even those with cardiovascular risk factors, such as hypertension. It is not known whether hot flushes are a cause for the development of endothelial dysfunction or are markers of this dysfunction, evidenced by estrogen deficiency, thus representing primitive target organ (vessel) lesion. Paroxetine was approved by the FDA as a non hormonal treatment for menopausal hot flashes. In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, the vascular effects of paroxetine at a dose of 7.5 mg / day, compared to placebo, during 12 weeks are evaluated.
Arterial flushing is a standard recommendation in deceased donor liver transplantation but not in living donor liver transplantation due to the risk of arterial intimal injury and short cold ischaemia time. There is recent evidence on benefit of retrograde arterial perfusion using hepatic venous occlusion and its benefits on post transplant cholestasis. However there is no data on antegrade arterial flushing.
A randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of uninterrupted transdermal nitrate therapy in 140 peri- or postmenopausal women who have frequent hot flashes. Women will be randomly assigned to uninterrupted use of transdermal nitrate therapy (participant directed dose-escalation of 0.2 to 0.6 mg/hr) or identical-appearing placebo patches for 12 weeks.
Placebo-controlled, double-blinded, cross-over clinical trial of a new investigational product
Follicular aspiration as well as follicular flushing are standardized techniques and have been practiced in polyfollicular IVF (in vitro fertilization) therapy for years. Monofollicular IVF therapy is a standard technique as well. IVF can be done in natural cycles or with a minimal stimulation with clomifen citrate to achieve a monofollicular response. Our study aims to compare follicular aspiration and follicular flushing in monofollicular stimulation. First the investigators want to answer the question whether flushing is beneficial for the oocyte yield. In case of a positive result the investigators want to establish a recommendation about the optimal number of flushings taking into account the duration of the procedure and the pain during manipulation.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether preovulatory uterine flushing with physiological saline is effective in the treatment of unexplained infertility.
The benefits and risks of flushing or not flushing the non-used PORT-A-CATH® in cancer patients and the time interval of eventual PORT-A-CATH® flushing are currently unknown. The manufacturers of PORT-A-CATH® recommend regular flushings every 4 weeks. In clinical practice, the intervals are usually at least three months. Regular flushing might lead to a decreased risk of PORT-A-CATH® thrombosis, but may also lead to an increased infection or thrombosis rate and patients discomfort. Therefore, this study investigates the safety of not flushing the PORT-A-CATH® for 6 or 12 months.
Patients & Methods: Eighty infertile women were randomly categorized into: Group EF (n=40) had EF after oocyte retrieval and Control group (n=40) did not have EF. All women were subjecte to the standard down-regulation regimen followed by controlled ovarian hyper stimulation . Oocytes were retrieved 34-36 h after hCG administration and aspirated FF was collected and centrifuged at 600 rpm for 10 min and 5-ml sample of supernatant was obtained for ELISA estimation of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), leptin and anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in both groups. The remaining amount was used for EF in EF group and was discarded in control group. Pregnancy was diagnosed by measurement of β-HCG level and confirmed by transvaginal sonography as clinical pregnancy
There is a surgical procedure to help children with intractable fecal incontinence gain continence for stool through construction of a tube that connects the abdominal wall to the colon near or through the appendix. This tube allows easy administration of enema solution into the first part of the colon. Putting enema solution through that tube into the colon is called an antegrade continence enema (ACE) and has been shown to work well in helping some but not all children prevent stool accidents. The purpose of this study is to compare a large volume ACE flush using a salt water solution called normal saline with a small volume ACE flush using liquid glycerin. The aims of this study are to: 1) find the most effective dose and flush frequency of each solution needed to prevent stool accidents; 2) compare which solution given at the best dose has the least side effects and 3) to determine if administration of either of the ACE flushing solutions causes electrolyte abnormalities or affects colon health.
300 women with unexplained infertility will be randomly divided into 2 equal groups: Group 1 will be offered tubal flushing with water soluble media through hysterosalpingography (HSG) and group 2 will receive no intervention