Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04496583 |
Other study ID # |
1200248 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
July 1, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
June 2023 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2021 |
Source |
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile |
Contact |
Eduardo Kattan, MD, MSc |
Phone |
+56994793024 |
Email |
e.kattan[@]gmail.com |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if testing preload responsiveness, the normal
physiologic state that means that changes in preload determine changes in cardiac output,
allows an earlier and physiologically safer weaning from mechanical ventilation in critically
ill patients with fluid overload, when compared to a strategy of fluid removal aimed at
obtaining a predetermined negative fluid balance.
Description:
Fluid overload is a state of global body accumulation of fluids with a deleterious impact in
organ function. This condition is frequently found in critically ill patients after acute
resuscitation. Its adverse impact is well demonstrated on weaning-induced heart failure,
pulmonary and visceral edema, intraabdominal hypertension, etc., which results in longer
mechanical ventilation and length of stay, and worse clinical outcomes. Despite these
well-known facts, there are no guidelines on how to implement depletive strategies on this
phase. The usual approach is to set in advance a desired negative fluid balance for the
upcoming days, initiating diuretics or ultrafiltration in preparation for weaning from
mechanical ventilation. Unfortunately, this strategy frequently results in excessive and
detrimental fluid removal.
A more physiologic approach to guide fluid removal is testing preload responsiveness, which
is the normal physiologic state, and means that changes in preload determine changes in
cardiac output, with mild or null increment in filling pressures. In contrast, preload
unresponsiveness corresponds to a state in which preload increases do not increase stroke
volume but produce large increments in filling pressures. This altered state is usually
present in patients with fluid overload. Preload responsiveness can be tested routinely in
the ICU by assessing the interactions between preload and cardiac output.
Now, in usual clinical practice, weaning from mechanical ventilation is accomplished through
a process called the spontaneous breathing trial (SBT), which is a standardized test to mimic
the real conditions of breathing without the ventilator, before extubation. One-third of
patients fail the initial SBT, which determines a prolonged or difficult weaning and longer
stay on mechanical ventilation. Importantly, one of the main determinants of this problem is
fluid overload. The pathophysiologic explanation lays in that when switching from positive
pressure ventilation to spontaneous breathing, intrathoracic pressure goes from being
steadily positive across the ventilatory cycle to markedly negative, promoting increased
preload and impeding left ventricular ejection, and this phenomenon is associated to preload
unresponsiveness. Interestingly, in most patients with fluid overload, preload responsiveness
can be restored just a few hours after starting fluid removal, while modifying fluid balance
may take several days. Notably, some patients may persist with preload unresponsiveness even
after achieving significant fluid removal.
The investigators hypothesized that in mechanically ventilated patients with fluid overload,
a fluid removal strategy aimed at attaining a state of preload responsiveness associates with
a decreased incidence of weaning failure from cardiovascular origin, shorter weaning time,
and less depletion-induced hypoperfusion events, metabolic derangements and kidney stress
compared to patients depleted with a fluid removal strategy aimed at obtaining a
predetermined negative fluid balance.
To confirm this hypothesis, the investigators propose a prospective randomized study on 46
critically ill mechanically ventilated patients with fluid overload, comparing these two
strategies of depletion and their impact on weaning development and other related systemic
functions. Throughout all the protocol, patients will receive general monitoring and
management according to ICU standards, plus protocol-specific monitoring that will be added
since randomization and before and after SBT attempts, for up to 72 h. Patients will be
followed-up for 28 days.
If the investigators' hypothesis is confirmed, it may generate a change in the paradigm of
managing fluid overload in critically ill patients, since the physiologic endpoint preload
responsiveness may suffice as the valid target and safety parameter to appropriately
discontinue mechanical ventilation, shortening the days on mechanical ventilation, the ICU
length of stay, and many other costs associated, among additional benefits.