View clinical trials related to Fluid Loss.
Filter by:The study is a prospective, non-randomized, non-blinded, non-significant risk study enrolling up to 60 healthy adult subjects consented to undergo a 1-unit whole blood draw procedure. Subjects will wear the study device (CM-1500) while positioned in either a supine or reclined position during the blood draw and study-required physiological parameters will be captured pre-, during, and post-donation.
Intravenous fluids are often given to increase stroke volume and thereby improve global oxygen delivery. The effect is however often transient, but the effect of a fluid bolus on stroke volume and other hemodynamic variables over time are poorly described. The volume effect of a fluid bolus (effect on blood volume) can be calculated by measuring Haemoglobin. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the hemodynamic effects of a fluid bolus during normovolemia and hypovolemia in healthy volunteers. Study details include: • Study Duration: 2 visits of approximately 2 h duration each + follow-up visit. Visits 1 and 2 are at least 2 days apart. Number of Participants: A maximum of 15 participants will be enrolled to study intervention such that 12 evaluable participants complete the study
Previous studies have shown that a positive fluid balance was an independent factor of worse prognosis in ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and negative fluid balance has been demonstrated to increase oxygenation index, reduce time under mechanical ventilation and ICU length of stay with no noticeable adverse effects. But there is no evidence that faster speed of negative fluid balance would be more beneficial for ARDS patients. So researchers designed the study to prove the effect of negatively fluid balancing speed for ICU patients with ARDS.