View clinical trials related to Fistula.
Filter by:Randomized controlled study to compare the results of two surgical techniques for AVF creation, including the anchor technique (Group A) and parachute technique (Group B). The study population will be patients referred to the Vascular surgery department for the creation of Hemodialysis access. Patients will be advised to undergo elective surgery for AVF once their renal Glomerular Filtration Rate Estimated (eGFR) is less than 15 ml/min. primary outcome: Functional Maturation of Arterio-venous Fistula [ Time Frame: Six Months] Ready fistula for cannulation, vein length at least 10 cm, diameter more than 6 mm, depth not more than 6 mm, and ability of the access to deliver a flow rate of 600ml/min and maintain dialysis for 4 hours.
Carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) refers to an aberrant arteriovenous communication between the carotid arterial system and the venous compartments of the cavernous sinus (CS) Direct CCFs are when there is a direct fistulous connection between the cavernous sinus and cavernous segment of the internal carotid artery (ICA), it is called direct or type-A CCF and occur secondary to a traumatic tear in the artery from a skull base fracture, from the acceleration-deceleration force of a traumatic injury, or from an iatrogenic injury following an endovascular intervention or a trans-sphenoidal procedure. They can also occur spontaneously following an ICA aneurysm rupture or weakening of the arteries from a genetic condition with subsequent development of chemosis, proptosis, bruit, headache, and/or gradual decrease in vision either unilaterally or bilaterally. High incidence of motor car accidents in Egypt carries a relative high incidence of carotid cavernous fistula. Since direct (type A) CCFs are high flow fistulas with acute/ subacute presentation and may cause serious complications, such as permanent vision loss or intracranial hemorrhage, they have to be treated early. CT orbit and MRI often help to confirm the initial diagnosis of CCF demonstrating extraoccularmuscleenlargement,dilatationofoneorbothsuperiorophthalmic veins and enlargement of the affected cavernous sinus.Because of its high spatial and temporal resolution ; the gold standard for evaluation of CCF is digital subtraction angiography; but currently CT angiography is the non invasive modality of choice for its evaluation .Previously surgical intervention included suturing or clipping the fistula, packing the cavernous sinus or ligating the internal carotid artery procedures .Currently endovascular management is the main stay of treatment for patients that fail or not suitable for conservative management and compression therapy. Significant advances in stent and catheter design now make it possible in many instances to deploy covered stents , detachable balloons, detachable coils, both detachable balloons and coils , both detachable and push coils , parent arterial occlusion and using of embolizing materials depending on availability, patient's affordability, type of fistula, and ease of use.Trans femoral catheterization is the main approach. However, trans-radial approach will be considered in patients with advanced iliofemoral diseases
Background The chronic oroantral fistulas (COAF) is an epithelized communication that is formed between the squamous epithelium of the oral cavity and the pseudo-stratified columnar ciliated epithelium of the maxillary sinus with a high recurrent rate. The use of palatal flaps has been documented for treating such fistulae. The presence of the oroantral fistula at the area of second molars or maxillary tuberosity could complicate the use of the palatal rotational flap where the arch of its rotation is increased leading to compromised blood supply. The use of the buccal flap is not advocated because it is very thin. Rationale Double or triple-layer closure is indicated to avoid recurrence of the COAF. Different layers have been documented to minimize the risk of recurrence and reinforce buccal flaps. The oral tissues at the oral side of the oroantral fistula could used as an additional layer with buccal advancement flap and buccal fat to omit the use of palatal flap with its subsequent problems in the most posterior aspect of the maxilla Study objectives Therefore, this study will be conducted to evaluate the use of hinge flaps to reinforce the buccal advancement flap for surgical closure of the COAF in the most posterior area of the maxilla Methods The hinge flap will be performed at the oral side of the COAF to close the perforation in the sinus membrane. The oral side of the COAF will be closed with buccal advancement flap. The success rate, recurrence, time of surgery, postoperative complications, will be evaluated.
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of TDM (therapeutic drug monitoring)-based infliximab (CT-P13, RemsimaTM) intravenous therapy compared with the standard infliximab (RemsimaTM) intravenous therapy for patients with active perianal fistulzing Crohn's disease.
Oroantral fistula (OAF) is a pathological communication between the oral cavity and the maxillary sinus. A variety of surgical techniques have been developed, with recurrence rates of up to 33%7, mainly due to wound contraction and postoperative infection. To increase the success rates of OAF closure procedures, the use of double-layered closure techniques has developed, but most of these techniques alter the original oral anatomy and may result in significant postoperative morbidity.
Various micronutrients play an important role in the process of closure and recurrence of enterocutaneous fistulas, such as Vitamin C and Zinc. However, there is no specific recommendation on the dose of these nutrients by parenteral route.
This is a prospective, randomized, multi-center clinical trial for chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients referred for creation of a new arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in order to assess the safety and effectiveness of SelfWrap, a bioabsorbable perivascular wrap.
Study Description: The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the duration of postoperative pain relief achieved with two different approaches to pudendal nerve block in patients undergoing elective perianal surgery. The main question this study aims to answer is whether adding Methylene Blue to Bupivacaine pudendal nerve block can prolong postoperative analgesia compared to using Bupivacaine alone. Participants in this study will be individuals with ASA I and II physical status undergoing elective perianal surgery under spinal anesthesia. They will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: 1. Group A (Case Group): Participants will receive a pudendal nerve block with Bupivacaine combined with Methylene Blue. 2. Group B (Control Group): Participants will receive a pudendal nerve block with Bupivacaine alone. The pudendal nerve block will be performed using ultrasound guidance at the level of the ischial spine. The needle tip will be positioned between the Sacro tuberous and sacrospinous ligaments to inject the local anesthetic or the local anesthetic combined with Methylene Blue. Throughout the study, the researchers will monitor the time to the first rescue analgesic, assess pain levels using the Numeric Rating Scale at various time intervals (2, 6, 24, 48 hours, and 7 days), and observe for any side effects or complications related to the intervention. Participants will be closely observed after surgery to assess their pain levels and analgesic requirements. The researchers will also evaluate patient satisfaction using the Likert scale. By comparing the outcomes between the two groups, the study aims to determine if the addition of Methylene Blue to Bupivacaine pudendal nerve block provides superior postoperative analgesia in perianal surgery patients. This information will contribute to the understanding of effective pain management strategies for individuals undergoing perianal surgical procedures and potentially reduce the need for opioids and improve patient outcomes.
The purpose of the investigation is to confirm the safety and performance of the Argyle™ Safety Fistula Cannula with Anti-reflux Valve for hemodialysis treatment.
The number of elderly hemodialysis patients is growing. Vascular access complications are a major determinant of the quality of life and health care costs for these vulnerable patients. The three different types of vascular access, i.e. autologous arteriovenous fistulas, arteriovenous grafts, and central venous catheters, have never been compared in randomized controlled trials. This project will deliver the much-needed evidence to determine the optimal strategy for vascular access creation in elderly hemodialysis patients in order to deliver better health care at lower costs.