View clinical trials related to Fever.
Filter by:There are compelling medical and public health reasons to reduce unnecessary consumption of antimalarials and strong evidence to support the use of RDTs in malaria case management. The primary study hypothesis to be tested is that clients who know they will receive a subsidy conditional on a positive test are more likely to opt for testing before deciding which drug to buy. The primary endpoint is whether subjects choose to be tested for malaria with a rapid diagnostic test. The secondary endpoint is whether they purchased an artemisinin combination therapy (ACT) or not. The primary outcome of interest is to compare the proportion of participants who choose to receive a free malaria diagnostic test when they can receive a subsidy for a discounted drug conditional on a positive test (Group A compared to Group B) compared to those without the offer of a conditional subsidy. The investigators will use an experimental design that randomly assigns clients to one of four groups. Field workers will canvas households in the study area looking for individuals who have fever or history of fever or illness in the last 24 hours (current illness) who have not yet taken drugs or sought treatment outside the home. Clients who meet the inclusion criteria and give verbal consent to participate will be randomly assigned to one of the four groups. They will be given the location and contact information for their local community health worker who can provide a malaria rapid diagnostic test if they choose to be tested. They will also complete a survey tool. One week later, the field worker will return to interview the participant and determine whether they were tested, what action they took for their illness, what medicine they purchased and how much they paid. The investigators will summarize clients' choice by the four randomized study groups.
Enteric fever, an infection characterised by diarrhoea and rash, is most often caused by a bacteria called Salmonella enterica. After ingesting contaminated food or drink, the Salmonellae travel first to the gut, then the bloodstream, from where they can infect other parts of the body. Antibiotics are used to kill the bacteria, but with increasing rates of antibiotic resistance, this treatment is becoming less effective. Two Salmonella variants, Typhi and Paratyphi, cause over 30 million cases of enteric fever and more than 200,000 deaths per year, mostly in developing countries. While improved hygiene and sanitation should eventually eliminate enteric fever, reduction of the disease burden in the medium term is achievable through effective vaccination. Vaccines likely to be available for mass vaccination are effective only against those Salmonella strains that bear the Vi polysaccharide capsule protein. Strains that do not have these capsule proteins, or have no capsule, will not be affected by vaccination and could 'fill' the space vacated by the capsulated strains. Indeed, enteric fever caused by S. Paratyphi A which does not carry the Vi protein, has risen during the past decade and accounts for more than half of all cases in some areas. Thus it is important that effective vaccines are available to protect against infection by both capsulated and noncapsulated Salmonella enterica. To develop such vaccines, we need a complete understanding of the human immune response to both types, including the contribution of immunity in the gut and the bloodstream, immune response to bacterial surface proteins, and the role of antibodies. How much cross-protection there is between the types of typhoidal Salmonellae after natural infection or vaccination is not known, but this is critical to vaccine development. This project aims to fill in the knowledge gaps highlighted, by fully characterising the infection process and immune response in enteric fever.
Detecting serious bacterial infections (SBI) in children presenting to the Pediatric Emergency Department (PED) with fever without source (FWS) is a frequent diagnostic challenge. The recently described Lab-score, based on the combined determination of Procalcitonin, C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and urine dipstick results, has been shown an accurate tool for SBI prediction on retrospective cohorts. The investigators aimed to assess the usefulness of the Lab-score in safely decreasing unnecessary antibiotic prescriptions in children with FWS, and to prospectively determine the diagnostic characteristics of the Lab-score compared to other classically used SBI biomarkers (white blood cell (WBC) count, band count and CRP).
To estimate the incidence of febrile neutropenia in patients with breast cancer and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma receiving high (> 20%) FN-risk chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim primary prophylaxis.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of discontinuation of colchicine treatment in a specific group of asymptomatic FMF patients with a single mutation in MEFV gene, both from a clinical and laboratory aspects.
This test is to be collected during the dengue outbreak samples, including samples back in the past and forward to close the case, investigating the prevalence of serum Chikungunya virus infection, and against those suspected dengue fever, Chikungunya disease-related tests conducted to clarify dengue and Chikungunya disease of clinical judgment, rapid method to detect Chikungunya virus and then develop.
A multicenter open-label non-inferiority randomized clinical trial comparing the safety (non-inferiority) of short antibiotic treatment (72 hours) with an anti-pseudomonal carbapenem with regard to treatment failure in comparison with extended treatment (at least 9 days) of high-risk febrile neutropenia in hematology patients receiving standard antimicrobial prophylaxis.
The purpose of this study is to compare the immune responses of two different doses (1.0 mg and 2.0 mg) and two different dosing schedules (two doses or three doses) of a mixed Hantaan virus (HTNV) and Puumala virus (PUUV) DNA vaccine in healthy participants. To maintain a blind, participants in the two-dose group will receive one dose of normal saline placebo. All of the groups will also receive a booster dose 6 months after first vaccination. The results will help to determine which dose and vaccination schedule will be best to move forward in the vaccine development process.
To confirm the safety of 6 cycles of Perfusion Induced Systemic Hyperthermia (PISH) provided every 28 days in 3rd line ovarian cancer patients.
The goal of this clinical research study is to learn if hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) will help to control the disease in patients with Stage 4 stomach or gastroesophageal cancer. The safety of this treatment will also be studied.