Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Despite its limitations, fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing analysis is the best monitor of fetal well-being during labor or preparation for cesarean delivery. Current monitoring methods: transabdominal ultrasound (CTG: cardiotocograph) and fetal scalp electrodes (FSE) have limitations (tracing loss during fetal movement, potential to confuse maternal for fetal heart rate, inability to monitor during cesarean section or abdominal surgery) and, in the latter case, risks (infection, hematoma). A reliable, non-invasive monitor of the fetal heart rate that can be used during labor, non-obstetric and obstetric surgery during pregnancy is needed. Recent developments in use of maternal abdominal electrodes for extraction of the FHR and contraction information inform this study.

LaborView®, developed by researchers at University of Florida (UF) College of Medicine and OBMedical, is an FDA-approved non-invasive labor monitoring device. Refinement of the extraction algorithms continues, and that work is most effectively performed at UF, where the primary researchers and OBMedical are located.

LaborView monitoring will be recorded from up to150 subjects admitted to Labor and Delivery at UFHealth. Data will be simultaneously obtained from the standard labor monitor. These signals will then be analyzed off-line for comparison and refinement of algorithms.


Clinical Trial Description

Despite its limitations, fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing analysis is the best monitor of fetal well being during labor. Typically, continuous electronic fetal monitoring is via transabdominal ultrasound (CTG: cardiotocograph). A transducer is strapped to the maternal abdomen and positioned in such a way to detect fetal rather than maternal heart rate. There are occasional periods of signal loss as the patient or her fetus moves, as well as times when the monitor incorrectly records the maternal signal. Maternal obesity presents particular challenges to non-invasive monitoring.

When there is particular concern regarding the fetal heart rate tracing the obstetrician may opt for a fetal scalp electrode (FSE). This is screwed into the fetus' presenting part through the opening in the cervix (requires ruptured membranes and adequate dilation). This signal is usually more reliable, but entails risks of chorioamnionitis, fetal scalp infection, scalp hematoma, and potential vertical transmission of maternal viruses including HIV and hepatitis.

Recently, devices have come to market that extract the FHR and uterine electromyograph (EMG) from maternal abdominal electrodes. The proposed study will provide data for refinement of the LaborView device produced by OBMedical.

Specific Aims:

The goal of this research is to evaluate the LaborView device under various settings and fetal heart rate accuracy as compared to a traditional CTG monitor.

Research Plan:

All patients admitted to the Labor & Delivery Suite at UF Health, will be eligible for inclusion in the study except minors and those unable to consent for themselves.

Following written informed consent, the external monitors (tocodynamometer and ultrasound) may not be removed. Per LaborView directions, electrode application sites will be prepared to reduce skin impedance, electrodes will be applied to the maternal abdomen and data acquired for comparison with CTG data obtained through the traditional monitoring system. FHR, ECG (electrocardiography), and uterine activity data from the existing fetal monitors will be collected via a laptop PC connected to the systems for comparison. The comparison will be performed off-line.

Evaluation of the data obtained will include (1) comparison of the calculated FHR with that of the CTG and/or fetal scalp electrode.

Nothing is required of the subjects. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no significant risk to the patient or her fetus. No longitudinal follow-up is planned or indicated. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03244865
Study type Observational
Source OBMedical Company
Contact
Status Completed
Phase
Start date September 29, 2016
Completion date April 11, 2018

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT05933928 - The Effect of Simulation-based Electronic Fetal Monitoring Training on Midwifery Students N/A
Completed NCT04779294 - The Oslo Stan vs Lactate Observational Study
Recruiting NCT05938790 - Point of Care Ultrasound in Obstetric Triage N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05510349 - Prevention of Per-partum Fetal Hypoxia: Measure of Placental Elasticity and Viscosity During Labor N/A
Terminated NCT02950896 - Intraoperative Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) Monitoring: a Feasibility Study
Not yet recruiting NCT03268486 - Evaluation of a Novel Signal Acquisition Technique for Intrapartum Cardiotocography N/A
Recruiting NCT06135961 - Intrapartum Non-invasive Electrophysiological Monitoring N/A
Recruiting NCT05847790 - Remote Pregnancy Monitoring to Improve Access N/A
Completed NCT02790554 - Moyo; strap-on Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in an Urban Setting N/A
Completed NCT05060172 - A Clinical Study for Validating the Equivalence of Bloomlife MFM-Pro to Clinical Standard-of-care for Antepartum Fetal Monitoring N/A
Recruiting NCT03111173 - Can Conventional ECG Technology Capture Fetal Cardiac Activity? N/A
Recruiting NCT05665400 - A Clinical Study for the Development of a Device (Lovelace) for Antepartum Fetal Monitoring N/A
Completed NCT02790814 - Moyo; strap-on Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in a Rural Setting N/A
Completed NCT05863156 - Evaluation of the Effects of Different Positions Given During Antenatal Electro-Fetal Monitoring N/A
Completed NCT04915131 - A Clinical Study for Validating the Equivalence of Bloomlife MFM-Pro to Clinical Standard-of-care for Performing Antepartum Fetal Monitoring N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06355453 - Evaluation of the Goldcrest Patch Performance