Fetal Monitoring Clinical Trial
Official title:
Refinement of LaborView Electronic Fetal Monitor
Despite its limitations, fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing analysis is the best monitor of fetal
well-being during labor or preparation for cesarean delivery. Current monitoring methods:
transabdominal ultrasound (CTG: cardiotocograph) and fetal scalp electrodes (FSE) have
limitations (tracing loss during fetal movement, potential to confuse maternal for fetal
heart rate, inability to monitor during cesarean section or abdominal surgery) and, in the
latter case, risks (infection, hematoma). A reliable, non-invasive monitor of the fetal heart
rate that can be used during labor, non-obstetric and obstetric surgery during pregnancy is
needed. Recent developments in use of maternal abdominal electrodes for extraction of the FHR
and contraction information inform this study.
LaborView®, developed by researchers at University of Florida (UF) College of Medicine and
OBMedical, is an FDA-approved non-invasive labor monitoring device. Refinement of the
extraction algorithms continues, and that work is most effectively performed at UF, where the
primary researchers and OBMedical are located.
LaborView monitoring will be recorded from up to150 subjects admitted to Labor and Delivery
at UFHealth. Data will be simultaneously obtained from the standard labor monitor. These
signals will then be analyzed off-line for comparison and refinement of algorithms.
Despite its limitations, fetal heart rate (FHR) tracing analysis is the best monitor of fetal
well being during labor. Typically, continuous electronic fetal monitoring is via
transabdominal ultrasound (CTG: cardiotocograph). A transducer is strapped to the maternal
abdomen and positioned in such a way to detect fetal rather than maternal heart rate. There
are occasional periods of signal loss as the patient or her fetus moves, as well as times
when the monitor incorrectly records the maternal signal. Maternal obesity presents
particular challenges to non-invasive monitoring.
When there is particular concern regarding the fetal heart rate tracing the obstetrician may
opt for a fetal scalp electrode (FSE). This is screwed into the fetus' presenting part
through the opening in the cervix (requires ruptured membranes and adequate dilation). This
signal is usually more reliable, but entails risks of chorioamnionitis, fetal scalp
infection, scalp hematoma, and potential vertical transmission of maternal viruses including
HIV and hepatitis.
Recently, devices have come to market that extract the FHR and uterine electromyograph (EMG)
from maternal abdominal electrodes. The proposed study will provide data for refinement of
the LaborView device produced by OBMedical.
Specific Aims:
The goal of this research is to evaluate the LaborView device under various settings and
fetal heart rate accuracy as compared to a traditional CTG monitor.
Research Plan:
All patients admitted to the Labor & Delivery Suite at UF Health, will be eligible for
inclusion in the study except minors and those unable to consent for themselves.
Following written informed consent, the external monitors (tocodynamometer and ultrasound)
may not be removed. Per LaborView directions, electrode application sites will be prepared to
reduce skin impedance, electrodes will be applied to the maternal abdomen and data acquired
for comparison with CTG data obtained through the traditional monitoring system. FHR, ECG
(electrocardiography), and uterine activity data from the existing fetal monitors will be
collected via a laptop PC connected to the systems for comparison. The comparison will be
performed off-line.
Evaluation of the data obtained will include (1) comparison of the calculated FHR with that
of the CTG and/or fetal scalp electrode.
Nothing is required of the subjects. They will be non-invasively monitored for one to several
hours. The information obtained will not be used for medical decision-making and there is no
significant risk to the patient or her fetus. No longitudinal follow-up is planned or
indicated.
;
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05933928 -
The Effect of Simulation-based Electronic Fetal Monitoring Training on Midwifery Students
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04779294 -
The Oslo Stan vs Lactate Observational Study
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05938790 -
Point of Care Ultrasound in Obstetric Triage
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05510349 -
Prevention of Per-partum Fetal Hypoxia: Measure of Placental Elasticity and Viscosity During Labor
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02950896 -
Intraoperative Fetal Heart Rate (FHR) Monitoring: a Feasibility Study
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03268486 -
Evaluation of a Novel Signal Acquisition Technique for Intrapartum Cardiotocography
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06135961 -
Intrapartum Non-invasive Electrophysiological Monitoring
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05847790 -
Remote Pregnancy Monitoring to Improve Access
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02790554 -
Moyo; strap-on Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in an Urban Setting
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05060172 -
A Clinical Study for Validating the Equivalence of Bloomlife MFM-Pro to Clinical Standard-of-care for Antepartum Fetal Monitoring
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03111173 -
Can Conventional ECG Technology Capture Fetal Cardiac Activity?
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05665400 -
A Clinical Study for the Development of a Device (Lovelace) for Antepartum Fetal Monitoring
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02790814 -
Moyo; strap-on Fetal Heart Rate Monitoring in a Rural Setting
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05863156 -
Evaluation of the Effects of Different Positions Given During Antenatal Electro-Fetal Monitoring
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04915131 -
A Clinical Study for Validating the Equivalence of Bloomlife MFM-Pro to Clinical Standard-of-care for Performing Antepartum Fetal Monitoring
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06355453 -
Evaluation of the Goldcrest Patch Performance
|