View clinical trials related to Febrile Neutropenia.
Filter by:The purpose of this observational study is to evaluate real-world safety and efficacy of pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) administered as secondary prophylaxis in Korean female patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy regimens recently covered under national health insurance. This is a prospective, observational, open-label trial with a target enrollment of 1400 subjects. Primary endpoint The primary aim of this study is to determine the incidence of febrile neutropenia. Secondary endpoint Major secondary endpoint include a) Incidence of bone pain, b) All adverse events, c) Percentage of patients with RDI (relative dose intensity) ≥ 85%
Patients with acute leukaemia requiring induction or consolidation chemotherapy and those requiring a haematopoietic stem cell transplant are at high risk of fever and infection when they have low white cell counts (neutropenic fever). The causes of neutropenic fever are frequently unknown and patients are treated with broad antibiotics, without a clear target to what is being treated. This study will prospectively enroll patients who are receiving chemotherapy for acute leukaemia or for a stem cell transplant and compare the diagnostic utility of bacterial and fungal PCR performed directly off blood drawn, to the standard blood culture. Patients who have persistent fever after 72 hours of antibiotics will then be randomized to have either the interventional scan (PET/CT) or the conventional scan (standard CT) to look for a source of infection. Diagnostic yield, change in management and outcomes will be compared between arms.
Prospective, multicentre French observational study assessing the performance and medico-economic utility of iDTECT Blood versus conventional microbiologic diagnosis in patients with febrile neutropenia
This pilot study aims to study intestinal bacterial and fungal translocation and the evolution of the intestinal microbiota in patients over the course of their medical surveillance to search for a link between dysbiosis and bacterial/fungal translocation, but also to better understand the elements involved in febrile episodes in these patients (lack of detection of blood microorganisms, translocation of constituent elements of these microorganisms, etc.). We hypothesize that the composition of the intestinal microbiota as well as the phenomenon of intestinal microbial translocation will have an influence on the occurrence of fever and/or bacteremia in neutropenic patients hospitalized in pediatric onco-hematology.
Neutropenia, defined by an absolute count of polymorphonuclear neutrophils less than <1500/mm3, exposes patients to infectious complications that can lead to sepsis or septic shock. The mortality risk is higher risk. The recommendations published in 2016 were formulated to homogenize the clinical practices to improve the survival.
CALIF study is a monocentric observational study which aim is to analyse the value of adding procalcitonin (PCT, a pre-hormon increased in bacterial infection and septicaemia) in the management of chemo-induced febrile neutropenia occurring in patient with solid tumour. Febrile neutropenia will be managed according to international guidelines. PCT will be dosed at initial presentation. Primary objective is to determine the optimal value of PCT for the detection of septicaemia in low risk (according to MASCC score). The investigators plan also to compare two risk stratification scores: the validated MASCC score and a recently developed score which includes PCT and other more objective items.
To assess the safety and establish the dose to assess the pharmacokinetic activity following administration of EC-18 in patients with advanced breast cancer receiving low febrile neutropenia risk chemotherapy who are the candidates for second-line or higher combination therapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide.
The use of e-health in improving the quality of health services is a rapidly expanding research area, in particular its usefulness in patient management of the home-hospital care pathway. Febrile neutropenia is a serious and frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapy and better identification of low-risk patients who can be treated at home could be made possible by these technologies. The objective of this study is to evaluate a shared health information system (NEUTROSIS) for home-hospital management of febrile neutropenia after anti-tumor chemotherapy. The study aims to compare the average length of hospital stay for febrile neutropenia among patients receiving NEUTROSIS and those receiving standard care Materials and methods A shared information system (NEUTROSIS) has been developed to connect a smartphone web application for the patient to the existing shared medical record of the Paris Sud hospital group (AP-HP, France - 4D software). The study consists of conducting a randomized controlled trial to compare a cohort of patients receiving cytotoxic chemotherapy for solid cancer or heamatological malignancies using the NEUTROSIS shared information system (n=100) and a cohort of patients followed by the hospital's standard care over a treatment period of six months (n=100). During the 15 days following each chemotherapy cycle, the 2 groups of patients must take their temperature daily. Both groups are trained like any patient under chemotherapy to contact the team in case of fever. The NEUTROSIS group captures daily its temperature and the occurrence of other symptoms on the smartphone application. This information is then transmitted instantly to the hospital care team who will be alerted in case of fever and will contact the patient. The control group will indicate these same data in a paper diary and will have to contact the health team in case of fever as done in the usual care. The two groups of patients will be followed 6 months through a questionnaire asked to the patient at each hospital visit for chemotherapy cycle. The questionnaire collects information on the occurrence of symptoms and healthcare use between two chemotherapy cycles. A last follow-up questionnaire is asked by phone at the endpoint follow-up (6 months). The study will take place in two hospital sites of the Paris University hospital (A Béclère and Kremlin-Bicètre).
The purpose of this study is to see how different antibiotics affect the community of friendly bacteria existing in the intestinal tract (gut). Under normal circumstances, these friendly bacteria are not harmful and they help with normal bodily functions such as digestion. When these bacteria are absent, several complications may occur, such as infections with harmful bacteria or other inflammatory reactions, that can complicate the stem cell transplant course. Treatment with antibiotics or chemotherapy is known to kill off these friendly bacteria. In this study we compare the effects of different antibiotics on the community of friendly bacteria in the gut. For microbiota-related biomarker analysis, optional urine samples (MSKCC patients only) will be collected at baseline, 7 +/-2 days after initiation of antibiotic therapy, and on post-transplant days +28, +56 and +100 (+/- 7days).
Pediatric patients with febrile neutropenia coming to Department of Medical Oncology with low risk features (culture awaited), will be started on intravenous antibiotics (Inj Cefoperazone+ Sulbactam ± Amikacin) on outpatient basis. Those patients will be reassessed for randomization once they fulfill all inclusion criteria and get afebrile for at least 24 hours. Antibiotics will be stopped in Arm-A and oral antibiotics, in place of intravenous antibiotics, will be started in Arm-B. The patients will be followed-up till ANC≥ 500, or reappearance of fever within follow-up of ≤ 10 days.