Effects of Active Versus Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation on

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) has shown to be an effective treatment for patients with persistent spinal pain syndrome Type 2 (PSPS Type 2). The method used to deliver electrical charge in SCS is important. One such method is burst stimulation. Two variations of burst waveforms are currently in use: one that employs active recharge and one that uses passive recharge. It is still unknown if there are clinical differences between active recharge and passive recharge burst SCS. To date, no clinical studies have been performed that directly compared these two burst stimulation waveforms. The objective of this Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) is to assess and compare effect of passive recharge burst SCS with active recharge burst SCS on pain relief and motivational-emotional facets of pain

Clinical Trial Description

This multicenter randomized clinical trial will take place in 6 Dutch hospitals: the Rijnstate Hospital (Arnhem), Bravis Hospital (Roosendaal), Elizabeth TweeSteden Hospital (Tilburg), Diakonessen Hospital (Utrecht), Alrijne Hospital (Leiden) and the Amsterdam University Medical Hospitals A-UMC). PSPS Type II2 patients (n=96) will be randomized into a group receiving either active or passive recharge burst. Following a successful trial period, patients are permanently implanted. Patients complete the pain catastrophizing score (PCS) (primary outcome at 6 months), numeric pain rating scale (NRS), patient vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS), quality of life (EQ-5D), Oswestery disability index (ODI), patient global impression of change (PGIC) and painDETECT questionnaires (secondary outcomes) at baseline, after trial, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months following implantation. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05421273
Study type	Interventional
Source	Rijnstate Hospital
Contact	Martijn Mons, Msc.
Phone	+31433881034
Email	m.mons@maastrichtuniversity.nl
Status	Recruiting
Phase	N/A
Start date	February 16, 2022
Completion date	December 31, 2023

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Completed	`NCT01701804` - The Effectiveness of Non-surgical Integrative Package on Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Not yet recruiting	`NCT01185665` - Predicting Outcome of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulator (TENS) in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome	N/A
Terminated	`NCT00974623` - Bone Graft Materials Observational Registry	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT01181817` - Evaluation of the Brain Activity During Spinal Cord Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Using Functional MRI and MRS	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04732325` - Sensory Testing of Multiple Forms of Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain	N/A
Completed	`NCT05018377` - Effectiveness and Safety of Percutaneous Adhesiolysis Using Rac'z Catheter Versus Navi Catheter in Management of Failed Back Surgery Syndrome	N/A
Not yet recruiting	`NCT04268602` - The Effect of Intradermal Local Anesthetic Injection in FBSS (Failed Back Surgery Syndrome)	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT03957395` - Comparison of Effectiveness of Tonic, High Frequency and Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation in Chronic Pain Syndromes	N/A
Completed	`NCT04121104` - Electrodermal Activity and Respiration in Patients Treated With Spinal Cord Stimulation	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT05068011` - Differential Target Multiplexed Spinal Cord Stimulation
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06034041` - The Effect of Mediclore as an Anti-adhesion Agent and Safety in Full-endoscopic Spine Surgery: a Preliminary Study	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT02837822` - Effects of Spinal Cord Stimulation on Sensory Perceptions of Chronic Pain Patients	N/A
Completed	`NCT01966250` - Electroacupuncture as a Complement to Usual Care for Patients With Non-acute Pain After Back Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT00018876` - Low-Dose Radiation to Prevent Complications of Back Surgery	Phase 1
Completed	`NCT03523000` - Determining the Prognostic Value of Continuous Intrathecal Infusion	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT01776749` - Subcutaneous Stimulation as Add on Therapy to SCS toTreat Low Back Pain in FBSS	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04244669` - Impact of the SCS With Different Waveforms Over the Quality of Life (SCS-Quality)	N/A
Completed	`NCT02974101` - AdaptiveStim Objectifying Subjective Pain Questionnaires	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01990287` - SENSE (Subcutaneous and Epidural Neuromodulation System Evaluation) Study	N/A
Terminated	`NCT01711619` - SubQStim: A Post-market Study of Subcutaneous Nerve Stimulation in Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) Patients	N/A

Clinical trials are conducted in a series of steps, called phases - each phase is designed to answer a separate research question.

Phase 1: Researchers test a new drug or treatment in a small group of people for the first time to evaluate its safety, determine a safe dosage range, and identify side effects.
Phase 2: The drug or treatment is given to a larger group of people to see if it is effective and to further evaluate its safety.
Phase 3: The drug or treatment is given to large groups of people to confirm its effectiveness, monitor side effects, compare it to commonly used treatments, and collect information that will allow the drug or treatment to be used safely.
Phase 4: Studies are done after the drug or treatment has been marketed to gather information on the drug's effect in various populations and any side effects associated with long-term use.

Effects of Active Versus Passive Recharge Burst Spinal Cord Stimulation on Pain Experience in Persistent Spinal Pain Syndrome Type 2: A Multicenter Randomized Trial (BURST-RAP Study) — BURST-RAP

Clinical Trial Summary

Clinical Trial Description

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms