Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Withdrawn

Administrative data

NCT number NCT00866892
Other study ID # 0808-081
Secondary ID
Status Withdrawn
Phase N/A
First received March 19, 2009
Last updated July 13, 2015
Start date April 2009
Est. completion date April 2010

Study information

Verified date July 2015
Source Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Institutional Review Board
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Most pediatric lacerations occur indoors and are considerably noncontaminated. Wounds that occur outside of the house where dirt often enters the laceration, irrigation and scrubbing with soap has been proven effective at decreasing post-laceration infections. To date there are no pediatric prospective studies addressing a less aggressive approach to face and scalp wound preparation in pediatrics. We argue that wiping wounds with sterile gauze soaked in sterile saline will not increase infection rates as compared to our current practice. In our emergency departments, the current standard of care for all lacerations is aggressive wound preparation: irrigation and scrubbing. This occurs regardless if the wound is contaminated or not. Research has proven that irrigation and scrubbing is unwarranted in adults with face and scalp lacerations. We want to perform a pilot/feasibility study comparing our two emergency campuses. One campus will serve as the control site, while the other will be the intervention site. In this pilot study, our goal is to demonstrate the feasibility of the intervention and provide data that a less aggressive approach to wound preparation is just as effective as our standard of care. We hope this project leads to further discussion about how we manage noncontaminated lacerations and provides a stepping-stone to a larger, appropriated powered study.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Withdrawn
Enrollment 0
Est. completion date April 2010
Est. primary completion date April 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 1 Month to 20 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

1. facial and scalp wounds acquired by blunt trauma,

2. wounds incurring within a house or indoor gym,

3. all ages, 1 month to 20 years of age.

Scalp is defined as the skin covering the head. The face is the area anterior to the ears, below the chin and extending to the hairline of the forehead. Wounds requiring deep sutures will also be included.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Patients presenting with wounds that occur outdoors,

2. Wounds greater than 12 hour old,

3. Immunocompromised, malnourished or a diabetic,

4. Intoxicated,

5. Currently on antibiotics,

6. Sickle cell anemia,

7. Collagen vascular disease,

8. Wounds requiring plastic surgery,

9. Wounds from human or animal bites,

10. Wounds not on the face or scalp,

11. Patient's just discharged from the hospital within 72 hours,

12. Wounds with foreign bodies or grossly contaminated,

13. No suture nurses are present or available to suture.

Study Design

Allocation: Non-Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Open Label, Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Irrigation
irrigation
No irrigation
no irrigation

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota St. Paul and Minneapolis Minnesota

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (10)

Baker MD, Lanuti M. The management and outcome of lacerations in urban children. Ann Emerg Med. 1990 Sep;19(9):1001-5. — View Citation

Haury B, Rodeheaver G, Vensko J, Edgerton MT, Edlich RF. Debridement: an essential component of traumatic wound care. Am J Surg. 1978 Feb;135(2):238-42. — View Citation

Hollander JE, Richman PB, Werblud M, Miller T, Huggler J, Singer AJ. Irrigation in facial and scalp lacerations: does it alter outcome? Ann Emerg Med. 1998 Jan;31(1):73-7. — View Citation

Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S, Henry MC. Wound registry: development and validation. Ann Emerg Med. 1995 May;25(5):675-85. Erratum in: Ann Emerg Med 1995 Oct;26(4):532. — View Citation

Hollander JE, Singer AJ, Valentine S. Comparison of wound care practices in pediatric and adult lacerations repaired in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 1998 Feb;14(1):15-8. — View Citation

Islam S, Ansell M, Mellor TK, Hoffman GR. A prospective study into the demographics and treatment of paediatric facial lacerations. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006 Oct;22(10):797-802. Epub 2006 Sep 1. — View Citation

Krizek TJ, Davis JH. Endogenous wound infection. J Trauma. 1966 Mar;6(2):239-48. — View Citation

Sagerman PJ. Wounds. Pediatr Rev. 2005 Feb;26(2):43-9. Review. — View Citation

Stussman BJ. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 1994 emergency department summary. Adv Data. 1996 May 17;(275):1-20. — View Citation

Valente JH, Forti RJ, Freundlich LF, Zandieh SO, Crain EF. Wound irrigation in children: saline solution or tap water? Ann Emerg Med. 2003 May;41(5):609-16. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Our specific aim is to provide evidence that using a less aggressive approach to wound preparation in a selective population will be as effective as our current practice. 12 months No
Secondary Our secondary goals are to involve nurses in a prospective interventional study, document the feasibility of the study, and demonstrate patient satisfaction with our suture outcomes. 12 months No