Clinical Trials Logo

Face Pain clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Face Pain.

Filter by:
  • None
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05416788 Completed - Bruxism Clinical Trials

Effect of Cervical Manipulation on Mouth Opening

Start date: May 11, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Objectives: To compare the effects of cervical manipulation on the ranges of motion of mouth opening and painful pressure points in the masseter and temporal muscles after of cervical manipulation compared to the control group. Material and methods: Single-blind randomized clinical trial with two arms, one group intervention and a control group. Hypothesis: There is a significant difference in mouth opening and painful pressure points between the intervention group and the control group. Expected results: The intervention group would significantly increase their mouth opening maximal and decrease pressure pain in the masseter and temporalis muscles.

NCT ID: NCT00992108 Not yet recruiting - Face Pain Clinical Trials

Efficacy of Botulinum Toxin Versus Lidocaine in Treating Masticatory Myofascial Face Pain Using Ultrasound and EMG Guided Techniques

Start date: October 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Botulinum toxin-A (BTX-A) prevents the release of acetylcholine in presynaptic terminals of the neuromuscular junction. It has been proposed to be effective in spastic conditions of the head and neck including oromandibular dystonias, bruxism, and muscular hypertrophy (1,2,3,4). However, only one randomized, double-blinded, placebo controlled trial has been completed involving 20 patients demonstrating both objective and subjective improvement in the BTX-A treated group over those treated with saline at one week, one month, and six months (5). Currently, in most orofacial pain practices, when the diagnosis of masticatory myofascial pain in the head region is made, patients are treated with a standard myofascial protocol. This protocol involves stretching, application of moist heat, spray and stretch, and lidocaine trigger point injections into the masticatory muscles. This is considered the standard of care among most orofacial pain practioners. There have been no randomized, double-blinded, head-to-head trials comparing BTX-A injections to lidocaine injections in the treatment of masticatory myofacial pain. Moreover, in all studies, muscles were targeted using surface landmarks with no confirmatory tests to guarantee the medication was administered to the intended muscle. In previous studies, the medial and lateral pteryoid muscles, important masticatory muscles that is often hyperactive in masticatory myofacial pain was not injected due to lack of palpable surface landmarks. Ultrasound and EMG guidance will help us locate these muscles. The purpose of this study is to objectively measure functional improvement in patients with masticatory myofascial pain injected with lidocaine versus BTX-A. A pilot study enrolling 20 patients is proposed. 20 patients will be randomized to receive either BTX-A or lidocaine injections into the bilateral temporalis, masseter, and medial and lateral pteryoid. Objective and subjective clinical parameters will be measured. These include pain at rest and with chewing, maximum non-assisted and assisted mouth opening, protrusive and laterotrusive jaw movements, subjective efficacy of treatment, and side-effects of treatment. Patients will be assessed at baseline, one week, one month, and three months after the procedure.