Essential Tremor Clinical Trial
— TREMBLEOfficial title:
The TREMBLE Study: Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of Awake Versus Asleep Tractography Based Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor
Rationale: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus is an effective surgical treatment for patients with disabling essential tremor, despite optimal pharmacological treatment. To date, the standard DBS procedure is performed under local anesthesia which is very burdensome for patients. It is now possible to directly visualize the target (motor) area in the thalamus due to advances in modern imaging techniques. DBS surgery could be performed under general anesthesia (asleep). Objective: The primary objective of the study is to determine whether asleep thalamic DBS surgery provides an equal tremor reduction compared to awake thalamic DBS surgery, measured by the clinically validated Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale after six months of DBS. Secondary outcomes are: disease related daily functioning, adverse effects, operation time, quality of life, patient satisfaction with treatment outcome and patient evaluation of treatment burden. Study design: The study will be a multicentre prospective randomized open label blinded (PROBE) endpoint trial comparing thalamic DBS under general versus local anesthesia. Study population: A total of 110 patients with disabling essential tremor despite optimal pharmacological treatment will be randomized. Intervention (if applicable): Patients will be randomized for asleep DBS or awake DBS. According to the standard DBS procedure, two brain-electrodes are connected to an implanted neurostimulator, which is placed subcutaneously in the subclavicular area Main study parameter/endpoints: The primary outcome measure is the change in tremor score on the Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale after 6 months of thalamic DBS. The secondary outcome measures are the Amsterdam Linear Disability Score for functional health status, Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire, patient satisfaction with the treatment, patient evaluation of treatment burden, operating time, hospitalization time, change of tremor medication, side effects and complications. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Awake DBS at present is very burdensome and by many patients and health care providers considered to be an overly invasive treatment for essential tremor. Through this trial, we aim to investigate whether asleep DBS in essential tremor can become the new treatment standard. This is expected to increase the accessibility for DBS and subsequently would allow more people with essential tremor to be helped, as well as in an earlier stage of their disease than currently; more patients will benefit for a longer time period from DBS. Asleep DBS will have a shorter procedure length. The proposed research project involves treatment options that are standard care in daily practice. The therapies will not be combined with other research products. Both treatments have a low risk of serious complications and a higher risk of minor side effects. Regular follow up will be used. Participation in this study constitutes moderate risk according to NFU criteria for human research.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 110 |
Est. completion date | July 1, 2028 |
Est. primary completion date | July 1, 2027 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Age > 18 years; - Idiopathic essential tremor - Disabling tremor despite optimal pharmacological treatment - A life expectancy of at least two years Exclusion Criteria: - Legally incompetent adults; - Previous tremor-neurosurgery (e.g., DBS, thalamotomy); - Contraindications for DBS surgery, such as a physical disorder making surgery hazardous; - Psychosis; - Current depression; - Unable to provide written informed consent. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Netherlands | Amsterdam UMC, location AMC | Amsterdam | Noord-Holland |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA) | Maastricht University Medical Center, Medical Center Haaglanden, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Radboud University Medical Center, The Elisabeth-TweeSteden Hospital, University Medical Center Groningen |
Netherlands,
1. Song P, Zhang Y, Zha M, et al. The global prevalence of essential tremor, with emphasis on age and sex: A meta-analysis. J Glob Health. Apr 10 2021;11:04028. 2. Schuurman PR, Bosch DA, Merkus MP, Speelman JD. Long-term follow-up of thalamic stimulation versus thalamotomy for tremor suppression. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. Jun 15 2008;23(8):1146-1153. 3. Bot M, van Rootselaar F, Contarino MF, et al. Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor: Aligning Thalamic and Posterior Subthalamic Targets in 1 Surgical Trajectory. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). Aug 1 2018;15(2):144-152. 4. Bot M, van Rootselaari AF, Odekerken V, et al. Evaluating and Optimizing Dentato-Rubro-Thalamic-Tract Deterministic Tractography in Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown). Sep 25 2021. 5. Bot M, Pauwels R, van den Munckhof P, et al. The Fast Gray Matter Acquisition T1 Inversion Recovery Sequence in Deep Brain Stimulation: Introducing the Rubral Wing for Dentato-Rubro-Thalamic Tract Depiction and Tremor Control. Neuromodulation. Jan 15 2022. 6. Holewijn RA, Verbaan D, van den Munckhof PM, et al. General Anesthesia vs Local Anesthesia in Microelectrode Recording-Guided Deep-Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease: The GALAXY Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. Sep 7 2021. 7. Graat I, Mocking RJT, Liebrand LC, et al. Tractography-based versus anatomical landmark-based targeting in vALIC deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. Dec 2022;27(12):5206-5212. 8. Nowacki A, Barlatey S, Al-Fatly B, et al. Probabilistic Mapping Reveals Optimal Stimulation Site in Essential Tremor. Ann Neurol. May 2022;91(5):602-612. 9. Coenen VA, Sajonz B, Prokop T, et al. The dentato-rubro-thalamic tract as the potential common deep brain stimulation target for tremor of various origin: an observational case series. Acta neurochirurgica. May 2020;162(5):1053-1066. 10. Akram H, Dayal V, Mahlknecht P, et al. Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor. Neuroimage Clin. 2018;18:130-142. 11. Nowacki A, Schlaier J, Debove I, Pollo C. Validation of diffusion tensor imaging tractography to visualize the dentatorubrothalamic tract for surgical planning. Journal of neurosurgery. Mar 23 2018;130(1):99-108. 12. Coenen VA, Allert N, Paus S, Kronenburger M, Urbach H, Madler B. Modulation of the Cerebello-Thalamo-Cortical Network in Thalamic Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: A Diffusion Tensor Imaging Study. Neurosurgery. Dec 2014;75(6):657-669. 13. Kremer NI, Pauwels RWJ, Pozzi NG, et al. Deep Brain Stimulation for Tremor: Update on Long-Term Outcomes, Target Considerations and Future Directions. J Clin Med. Aug 5 2021;10(16).
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) | The amount of decrease in motor symptoms indicated by change in the disease-specific Essential Tremor Rating Assessment Scale (TETRAS) after six months of deep brain stimulation. The TETRAS scores are between 0 and 64; higher scores indicating worse (more severe) tremor symptoms. | assessment will be done before DBS and after 6 months of DBS | |
Secondary | The Amsterdam Linear Disability Score for functional health status | The Amsterdam Linear Disability Score (ALDS) is a generic itembank which measures disability, as expressed by the ability to perform activities of daily living. These scores are linearly transformed into values between 0 and 100. Lower scores indicate more disability. | assessment will be done before DBS and after 6 months of DBS | |
Secondary | Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire | The Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST) is a 30-item scale developed specifically for patients with essential tremor to measure items impacting perceived quality of life (QOL) that generic QOL measures do not effectively capture, including activities of daily living that are affected by essential tremor. The QUEST was made to be relatively brief and easy for patients to use. | assessment will be done before DBS and after 6 months of DBS | |
Secondary | Global Impression of Change | The CGI provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including a knowledge of the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the patient's ability to function. The CGI actually comprises two companion one-item measures evaluating the following: (a) severity of psychopathology from 1 to 7 and (b) change from the initiation of treatment on a similar seven-point scale. | assessment will be done before DBS and after 6 months of DBS | |
Secondary | EQ-5D-5L | The EQ-5D-5L consists of 2 pages: the EQ-5D descriptive system and the EQ visual analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state.
The EQ VAS records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The best health you can imagine' and 'The worst health you can imagine'. The VAS can be used as a quantitative measure of health outcome that reflect the patient's own judgement. |
assessment will be done before DBS and after 6 months of DBS |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Withdrawn |
NCT05381688 -
VIM DBS Respiratory Modulation: N-of-1 Trial
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05101161 -
Neurofeedback Using Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02277106 -
Evaluate SAGE-547 in Participants With Essential Tremor
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05769933 -
Bridging Gaps in the Neuroimaging Puzzle: New Ways to Image Brain Anatomy and Function in Health and Disease Using Electroencephalography and 7 Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging
|
||
Terminated |
NCT02678429 -
Atlas Predicted DBS Settings in Essential Tremor
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02894567 -
Evaluation of Directional Recording and Stimulation Using spiderSTN
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02523807 -
Tremor Monitoring Device
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02255929 -
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Treatment of Essential Tremor
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01223144 -
Decision-making and Emotion Recognition in Essential Tremor
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00906412 -
Ventrointermediate Nucleus (VIM DBS) and Working Memory
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05214222 -
Penpulimab Plus Chemotherapy With/Without Anlotinib for Patients With Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT03051178 -
Wearable Sensor for Responsive DBS for ET
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03795935 -
Relief From Side Effects: Clinical Use of Electrodes With Direction
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06036368 -
Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Peroneal Transcutaneous NeuroModulation in Subjects With Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05897775 -
Coordinated Reset Deep Brain Stimulation for Essential Tremor
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT06314139 -
Tolerability and Efficacy of Continuous Theta-burst Stimulation for Essential Tremor: A Randomized Study.
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04501133 -
Sensory-specific Peripheral Stimulation for Tremor Management
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03560622 -
Functional Neuroimaging Feedback for Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00368199 -
Transcranial Duplex Scanning and Single Photon Emission Computer Tomography (SPECT) in Parkinsonian Syndromes
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05480215 -
Symptomatic Relief of Action Tremor With Cala Trio Using Trio+ Bands
|
N/A |