Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01001572
Other study ID # CVAA489A2317
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received October 15, 2009
Last updated May 18, 2011
Start date September 2009
Est. completion date May 2010

Study information

Verified date May 2011
Source Novartis
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority China: Food and Drug AdministrationRomania: National Medicines AgencyPhilippines: Bureau of Food and Drugs
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg single-pill combination in patients with uncomplicated essential hypertension not adequately controlled (MSDBP ≥90 mmHg and <110 mmHg) on valsartan 160 mg alone.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 932
Est. completion date May 2010
Est. primary completion date May 2010
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 18 Years to 85 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients must give written informed consent

- Male or female ages 18 or older and less than 86 years

- Diagnosed as having essential diastolic hypertension, as follows:

- Visit 2/Single-blind run-in entry, all participants MUST have a MSDBP = 95 mmHg and < 100 mmHg

- At Visit 3/Core double-blind treatment period entry, all patients MUST have a MSDBP >=90 mmHg and <110 mmHg

Exclusion Criteria:

- Severe hypertension

- Evidence of secondary form of hypertension (coarctation of the aorta, hyperaldosteronism, unilateral or bilateral renal artery stenosis, Cushing's disease, pheochromocytoma or polycystic kidney disease )

- Malignant hypertension

- Administration of any agent indicated for the treatment of hypertension after Visit 1

- Known moderate or malignant retinopathy.

- Known or suspected contraindications, including history of allergy or hypersensitivity to Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARBs), Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs), or to drugs with similar chemical structures

- History of hypertensive encephalopathy, cerebrovascular accident, or transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction or all types of revascularization, angina pectoris of any type, including unstable angina

- History of heart failure Grade II-IV according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification

- Second of third degree heart block regardless of the use of a pacemaker, concomitant potentially life-threatening arrhythmia or symptomatic arrhythmia

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
Valsartan/amlodipine 160/5 mg
Valsartan/amlodipine 160/5mg film coated tablets taken orally once daily.
Valsartan 160 mg
Valsartan 160 mg capsule taken orally once daily.
Placebo
1 capsule or tablet taken orally once daily

Locations

Country Name City State
China Novartis Investigative Site TBD
Philippines Novartis Investigative Site TBD
Romania Investigative site in Romainia TBD

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Novartis

Countries where clinical trial is conducted

China,  Philippines,  Romania, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) From Baseline to Week 8 Endpoint Three arterial blood pressure (BP) determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSDBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSDBP was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and center (pooled as appropriate) as factors and centered baseline MSDBP as a covariate. Baseline and Week 8 No
Secondary Change in Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP) From Baseline to Week 8 Endpoint Three arterial blood pressure (BP) determinations were made after the participant was in the sitting position for 5 minutes according to the American Heart Association guidelines using a calibrated standard aneroid or mercury sphygmomanometer or a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The change in the MSSBP was calculated comparing the Week 8 readings to the readings taken at Baseline. The change from baseline in MSSBP was analyzed using an analysis of covariance model (ANCOVA) with treatment and center (pooled as appropriate) as factors and centered baseline MSSBP as a covariate Baseline and Week 8 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Diastolic Blood Pressure Response at 8 Week Endpoint The percentage of participants with a Diastolic Blood Pressure Response defined as the percentage of participants with a Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) < 90 mmHg or a >= 10 mmHg reduction from baseline. Baseline and Week 8 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Diastolic Blood Pressure Control at 8 Week Endpoint The percentage of participants with Diastolic Blood Pressure Control defined as the percentage of participants with a Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) < 90 mmHg. Week 8 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With Overall Blood Pressure Control at 8 Week Endpoint The percentage of participants with Overall Blood Pressure Control defined as the percentage of participants with a Mean Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (MSSBP)/Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure (MSDBP) < 140/90 mmHg. Week 8 No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT03708601 - Prognostic Risk of Patients With Essential Hypertension for Cardiovascular Events (PROSPECT)
Not yet recruiting NCT05503953 - Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AGSAVI in Patients With Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled With AGLS Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05526703 - Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of D064 and D701 Combination Therapy Phase 3
Completed NCT02890173 - Study of CS-3150 in Patients With Essential Hypertension Phase 3
Completed NCT02944734 - Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy and Monotherapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Dose-Finding in Patients With Essential Hypertension Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT02096939 - Microvascular Function in Primary Aldosteronism N/A
Recruiting NCT01956786 - Efficacy of Amlodipine-Folic Acid Tablets on Reduction of Blood Pressure and Plasma Homocysteine Phase 2/Phase 3
Completed NCT02553512 - Helius in Hypertension-I: The UK Hypertension Registry N/A
Completed NCT01198249 - Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions Between Single and Concomitant Administrations of Amlodipine, Losartan, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With (Pre)Hypertension Phase 1
Recruiting NCT00380289 - Early Metabolic Changes With Thiazide or Beta Blocker Therapy for Essential Hypertension N/A
Completed NCT00139698 - Olmesartan Alone or in Combination With Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension Phase 3
Completed NCT00288184 - Uric Acid in Essential Hypertension in Children Phase 2
Completed NCT01289886 - Fimasartan (BR-A-657) Single Oral Dose in Healthy Subjects Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT06041529 - Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TEL/AML/CTD in Elderly Patients With Essential Hypertension Phase 4
Completed NCT04470830 - A Study for PMS of AZL-M/CLD FDC in the Treatment of Participants With Essential HTN in South Korea
Completed NCT00758524 - A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of LCI699 in Participants With Essential Hypertension Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05109013 - Juvenile Essential Arterial Hypertension and Vascular Function
Completed NCT00741585 - Prognostic Value of the Circadian Pattern of Ambulatory Blood Pressure for Multiple Risk Assessment Phase 4
Active, not recruiting NCT05843682 - Technological Innovation in the Virtual Assistance of Patients With Uncontrolled Arterial Hypertension - Hyper 2 N/A
Recruiting NCT04554303 - Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Amlodipine Verses S Amlodipine in Patients With Essential Hypertension