Essential Hypertension Clinical Trial
Official title:
A 10 Week, Randomized, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Dosing of Aliskiren (300 mg qd) to Twice Daily Dosing of Aliskiren (150 mg Bid) in Patients With Essential Hypertension.
This study will compare the safety and efficacy of once daily dosing of aliskiren to twice daily dosing of aliskiren in patients with moderate hypertension
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 328 |
Est. completion date | November 2008 |
Est. primary completion date | November 2008 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | Both |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Have diagnosis of uncomplicated essential hypertension; newly diagnosed or who have not received antihypertension medication within 4 weeks of visit 1 must have an office cuff mean sitting Diastolic Blood pressure (msDBP) > 100 mmHg and < 110 mmHg at visit 1. If patient is receiving antihypertensive treatment, must have a cuff msDBP > 95 mmHg and < 110 mmHg at visit 1 - Prior to randomization, all patients must have an office cuff msDBP >or= 100 mmHg and <or = 110 mmHg. Exclusion Criteria: - Participation in another aliskiren trial or previous treatment with aliskiren during last 6 months and who qualified to be randomized or enrolled into the active drug treatment period - Pregnant or nursing women - Women of child bearing potential unwilling to use protocol specific contraceptive methods - Office cuff blood pressure of msDBP = 112 mmHg and/or mean sitting Systolic Blood Pressure (msSBP) = 200 mmHg). - Secondary form of hypertension - History of heart failure New York Heart Association (NYHA Class II, III and IV) - Previous history of hypertensive encephalopathy or stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), heart attack, coronary bypass surgery or any percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) - Elevated Serum potassium (> or = 5.3 mEq/L (mmol/L) at Visit 1 - Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes mellitus not well controlled - Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply |
Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | Investigative Site | Frankfurt | |
Spain | Investigative Site | Valencia | |
United States | Investigative Site | Zanesville | Ohio |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Novartis |
United States, Germany, Spain,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (MADBP) | An Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) device was attached to the non-dominant arm of the participant. The mean of Blood Pressure readings during the 24 hour period were calculated. The difference of the 24 hour MADBP from baseline to the 24 hour MADBP at 6 weeks was calculated using an Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with baseline mean 24 hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure as a covariate. | Baseline, Week 6 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Mean Ambulatory Diastolic Blood Pressure (MADBP) During the Last 3 Hours of the 24-hour Dosing Period | An Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) device was attached to the non-dominant arm of the participant. The mean of Blood Pressure readings during the 22-24 hour period were calculated. The difference from the last 3 hours MADBP at baseline to the last 3 hour MADBP at Week 6 was calculated using an ANCOVA model with baseline mean 24 hour ambulatory diastolic blood pressure as a covariate. | Baseline, Week 6 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Mean Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (MASBP) During the Last Three Hours of the 24-hour Dosing Period | An Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) device was attached to the non-dominant arm of the participant. The mean of Blood Pressure readings during the 22-24 hour period were calculated. The difference from the last 3 hours MASBP at baseline to the last 3 hour MASBP at Week 6 was calculated using an ANCOVA model with baseline mean 24 hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure as a covariate. | Baseline, Week 6 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Mean 24-hour Ambulatory Systolic Blood Pressure (MASBP) | An Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) device was attached to the non-dominant arm of the participant. The mean of Blood Pressure readings during the 24 hour period were calculated. The difference of the 24 hour MASBP from baseline to the 24 hour MASBP at 6 weeks was calculated using an ANCOVA model with baseline mean 24 hour ambulatory systolic blood pressure as a covariate. | Baseline, Week 6 | No |
Secondary | Change From Baseline to Week 6 in the Mean Sitting Systolic and Mean Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure | After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer and appropriate size cuff. The repeat sitting measurements were made at 1-2 minute intervals and the mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure for that visit. A negative number indicates lowered blood pressure. The ANCOVA model used baseline as a covariate. | Baseline, Week 6 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Control at Week 6 | After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure at visit 3 (week 6). Blood pressure control was defined as having a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) <90 mm Hg and a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) <140 mm Hg. |
Week 6 | No |
Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Blood Pressure Control at the End of the Study (Week 10) | After the patient had been sitting for 5 minutes, with the back supported and both feet placed on the floor, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured 3 times using a calibrated standard sphygmomanometer. The mean of these 3 sitting blood pressure measurements was used as the average sitting blood pressure at visit 4 (week 10). Blood pressure control was defined as having a mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) <90 mm Hg and a mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP) <140 mm Hg. |
Week 10 | No |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT03708601 -
Prognostic Risk of Patients With Essential Hypertension for Cardiovascular Events (PROSPECT)
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05503953 -
Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AGSAVI in Patients With Essential Hypertension Inadequately Controlled With AGLS
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05526703 -
Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of D064 and D701 Combination Therapy
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT06395194 -
Effects of Valsartan vs Amlodipine and Low BP on Kidney Outcomes in Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06418074 -
Effects of Exogenous Ketosis on Renal Function, Renal Perfusion, and Sodium Excretory Capacity
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02890173 -
Study of CS-3150 in Patients With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT02096939 -
Microvascular Function in Primary Aldosteronism
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02944734 -
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Combination Therapy and Monotherapy of Candesartan and Amlodipine for Dose-Finding in Patients With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT01956786 -
Efficacy of Amlodipine-Folic Acid Tablets on Reduction of Blood Pressure and Plasma Homocysteine
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02553512 -
Helius in Hypertension-I: The UK Hypertension Registry
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01198249 -
Pharmacokinetic Drug Interactions Between Single and Concomitant Administrations of Amlodipine, Losartan, and Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With (Pre)Hypertension
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT01001572 -
Efficacy and Safety of Valsartan/Amlodipine in Patients With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT00380289 -
Early Metabolic Changes With Thiazide or Beta Blocker Therapy for Essential Hypertension
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00139698 -
Olmesartan Alone or in Combination With Hydrochlorothiazide in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT00288184 -
Uric Acid in Essential Hypertension in Children
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01289886 -
Fimasartan (BR-A-657) Single Oral Dose in Healthy Subjects
|
Phase 1 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06041529 -
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TEL/AML/CTD in Elderly Patients With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT04470830 -
A Study for PMS of AZL-M/CLD FDC in the Treatment of Participants With Essential HTN in South Korea
|
||
Completed |
NCT00758524 -
A Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of LCI699 in Participants With Essential Hypertension
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05109013 -
Juvenile Essential Arterial Hypertension and Vascular Function
|