View clinical trials related to Esophageal Neoplasms.
Filter by:The primary goal of this study is to quantify the biomarkers of pre-radiation therapy(RT), during-RT, and post-RT serum samples from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive or neoadjuvant RT, and to correlate them with tumor response, patterns of failure, survival outcome, and RT-related lung or liver toxicity. The secondary goal of this study is to set up the PLA platform in our institute for future biomarker test.
Radiation therapy plus concurrent chemotherapy is now the standard therapy for patients with localized carcinoma of the esophagus selected for nonsurgical treatment. The standard radiation dose is 50-50.4Gy/1.8-2.0Gy/F.All of this were based on 2D radiation technology. Entering new century, 3D-CRT or IMRT has used on esophageal cancer. In China,the recommend radiation dose of concurrent chemoradiation was 60Gy. The study is a clinical phase III, randomized trial to compare the different radiation dose(60Gy vs 50Gy) of concurrent chemoradiation using 3D-CRT or IMRT in patients with unresectable esophageal carcinoma.
This study is aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 18F-FDG PET in the initial staging, therapy planning, and therapeutic response monitoring for esophageal cancer patients. Purpose: 1. The incremental staging information by using 18F-FDG PET 2. The impact of the PET results on the patients' subsequent therapy planning 3. To compare treatment response using RECIST criteria and FDG PET results.
40 eligible patients with confirmed esophageal or gastric adenocarcinoma and anemia will be randomized to a control or intervention group for management of this anemia. The control group treatment will consist of standard treatments as governed by the clinical team (eg oral iron, blood transfusions) whilst the intervention group will be treated with intravenous iron III isomaltoside (Monofer ®). It is hypothesized that intravenous iron supplementation is more efficacious than standard therapies.
The incidence of cancer of the esophagogastric junction has rapidly risen in recent three decades, and surgery still remains the optimum therapy. For Siewert's type II and III cancer, esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after subtotal gastrectomy are regarded as the two main surgical approaches. Esophagojejunostomy after total gastrectomy brings high survival rate and low local recurrence rate which may also induces pulmonary infection or regurgitation. Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy after subtotal gastrectomy needs reconstruction of the gastric tube and the width of reconstruction tube was a key factor to predicate prognosis. However, no evidence supplies a comprehensive standard on the width of reconstruction tube which often ranges from 3 cm to 6 cm. Both narrow and wide reconstruction tubes have their own advantages and disadvantages. So the prospective trail recruits patients into three groups: total gastrostomy group (TG group), wide gastric tube group (WG group) and narrow gastric tube group (NG group). And the investigators compare the quality of life using integrated questionnaire of QLQ-STO22 and QLQ-C30 and related symptom relief as main endpoints.
About 7500 patients are diagnosed with oesophageal cancer each year in the UK of which less than a quarter have resectable disease at diagnosis. There is a general lack of consistency in the standard of care for patients across UK hospitals. Patients are either treated with a) chemotherapy followed by surgical removal of the tumour, or b) chemoradiotherapy followed by removal of the tumour by surgery, as part of their standard of care. Recent research supports the latter treatment, as chemoradiotherapy maybe more effective at shrinking the tumour and preventing the disease from spreading than taking chemotherapy alone. However, there is no definitive way of identifying which treatment is best without a clinical trial. Evidence suggests that the effect of the chemoradiotherapy currently used as standard practice may be improved and the side effects reduced by using a different chemoradiotherapy combination. In this trial, eligible patients will receive 2 cycles of the same chemotherapy before being randomised to receive two different chemoradiotherapy regimens (carboplatin and paclitaxel verses oxaliplatin and capecitabine) both of which have shown promising results in previous studies. Patients will then have their tumour removed. The best chemoradiotherapy regimen will then be taken forward to a Phase III trial in which chemoradiotherapy will be compared with chemotherapy alone. The efficacy of the regimens will be measured by counting the number of patients who i) remain free from cancer, ii)have local or distant spread of their cancer, iii) are successfully recruited and iv) experience toxicities. A specific set of toxicity criteria will be used to monitor any treatment induced side-effects and provide justification for any necessary dose modifications or withdrawal of treatment.
Most local failures after definitive chemoradiation for unresectable esophageal cancer occur in the gross tumor volume (GTV). And the metabolic active areas post-treatment were located in the high FDG uptake areas prior to the radiotherapy. The hypothesis is that selective dose boost to the esophageal GTV could be safely delivered using a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique, and that boosting the high 18F-deoxyglucose (FDG) uptake areas of the esophageal GTV defined prior to treatment may improve local tumor control.
The objective of the study is comparison of the efficacy and safety of palliative therapy with single-dose brachytherapy or selfexpanding metal stents (SEMS) in malignant dysphagia resulting from adenocarcinoma of the esophago-gastric junction.
The ultimate goal of the Barrett's Esophagus Patient Registry is to help develop more effective targeted screening strategies and treatment options for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC). We plan to do by developing a registry that will serve as a platform. Examples of analyses could include identifying genetic determinants and biomarkers that predict BE, progression of BE to EAC, as well as the response to therapies.
The aim of this study was to compare raltitrexed/oxaliplatin plus radiotherapy versus radiotherapy in subjects with inoperable esophageal cancer.