View clinical trials related to Esophageal Neoplasms.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of esophageal epithelial regenerative treatment by the transplantation of the product, CLS2702C, to the esophageal wound site after extensive ESD for superficial esophageal cancer.
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and compare the efficacy of andecaliximab (GS-5745) in combination with nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in adults with recurrent gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerance and efficacy of Liposomal Paclitaxel With Nedaplatin as First-line in patients with Advanced or Recurrent Esophageal Carcinoma
Definitive chemoradiation is the standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer. NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) recommends radiation dose of 50-50.4 Gy as the definitive radiation dose for esophageal cancer with definitive chemo-radiation. However, as many studies in China showed that the most common recurrence site after definitive chemo-radiation was within the radiation region. But there have not been large randomized clinical trials to investigate the optimal radiation dose with concurrent chemotherapy for esophageal cancer in China. The purpose of this clinical trial is to investigate the optimal radiation dose for thoracic esophageal squamous cell cancer with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Stage I of the Thoracic-POISE study will pilot-test a broad-based, multi-agent integrative care intervention delivered by naturopathic doctors in conjunction with standard surgical and oncologic care of people with thoracic cancer.
The aim of this study is the safety and efficacy of cryosurgery plus NK immunotherapy to advanced esophageal cancer.
In patients with esophageal cancer (EC) neo-adjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT) followed by surgery with curative intent leads to objective responses in 45 to 60%, whereas 20-35% of the patients had no residual tumor (ypT0N0) at pathologic examination. The absolute survival benefit of response to nCRT is 15%, but still 14% of the patients develop locoregional failure in the CROSS trial. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography ((FDG-PET-CT) is able to distinct responders from non-responders, but still misses significant clinical evidence. Whole-body diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has shown potential benefits, which might be enhanced by combining both methods. PET/CT and DWI-MRI more precisely correlate anatomic and metabolic FDG-avid lesions and seem to assess post-treatment changes, especially regarding nodal staging. Both techniques claim an important role in selection of patients with clinical complete response (cCR) and indirectly with pathologic complete response (pCR) after nCRT. However, the exact role and complementary effects of both techniques is still unknown. For appropriate judgment of response, secure standard endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) with fine needle aspiration (FNA) / biopsy of potential suspected lesions, both nodal or residual tumor, seen on PET/CT or DWI/MRI or during EUS will be performed <2 weeks before surgery, approximately 6-10 weeks after nCRT and compared with the situation at primary staging. Patients with clinical complete response (cCR) resembling pathologic response (pCR= ypT0N0) after nCRT may refrain from surgical resection and related morbidity and mortality. However, patients without early (2wk after commencement) response during nCRT course may not benefit from nCRT. DWI-MRI seems effective in pre-treatment prediction of treatment outcome. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), which indirectly measures tissue density, can be used to determine the likelihood of tumor response to treatment. High ADC before treatment has shown to predict an unfavorable response. Tumors with low ADC values on presentation generally respond better to treatment. An increased ADC in patients during and after nCRT could be used to predict early pathologic response i.e. discrimination of "responders and non-responders" to nCRT.
This was a randomised, multicenter, phase 3 trial. Patients who were age of 70 years or older with histologically confirmed esophageal cancer were randomly assigned to S-1 concurrent with radiotherapy or radiotherapy alone.The primary endpoint was overall survival.
Determine the feasibility of assessment of measures of frailty and determine if these measures provide a clinically important contribution of risk assessment in a population of patients undergoing major thoracic surgery for lung or esophageal cancer.
This is an open-label single photon emission computed tomography / computed tomography (SPECT/CT) study to investigate the safety and diagnostic performance of 99mTc-HYNIC-3PEG4-E[c(RGDfK)2) (99mTc-3PRGD2) in esophagus cancer patients. A single dose of nearly 11.1 MBq/kg body weight of 99mTc-3PRGD2 ( ≤ 20 µg 3PRGD2) will be intravenously injected into the patients in suspicion of esophagus cancer. Visual and semiquantitative method will be used to assess the whole-body planar and thoracic SPECT/CT images. Any adverse events will be collected from the patients.