View clinical trials related to Esophageal and Gastric Varices.
Filter by:The aim of the study is to evaluate the ability of Doppler ultrasonography of the portal vein and liver stiffness measurement using Transient Elestoghraphy in predicting prescence of gastroesophageal variceal and variceal bleeding in patients with liver cirrhosis
Research has proven that large varices can be treated with beta-blockers (a type of anti-hypertensive medication) to reduce the pressure in the veins. The management of small varices is still uncertain. This study aims to discover if beta blockers can be used in this setting. We hypothesize that beta blockers will reduce the risk of bleeding from small varices from 20% to 10% over a period of 3 years, resulting in significant cost savings to the NHS from better patient outcomes.
Primary prophylaxis of gastric varices is an important area of research, as gastric varices are a common complication of cirrhosis of the liver. Cirrhosis is a condition in which the liver becomes scarred and loses its ability to function properly, and it is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Gastric varices occur in up to 30% of patients with cirrhosis, and they can rupture, leading to life-threatening bleeding. The clinical, epidemiological, and public health context of primary prophylaxis of gastric varices is therefore the need to prevent the development of this complication in patients at risk for cirrhosis and to reduce the associated morbidity and mortality. The clinical trials on primary prophylaxis of gastric varices are therefore focused on evaluating the safety and efficacy of various interventions, such as beta-blockers and endoscopic techniques, in reducing the risk of gastric varices in patients with cirrhosis. The goal of this trial is to find the most effective and safe strategies for primary prophylaxis of gastric varices, in order to improve the outcomes for patients with cirrhosis.
The aim of this study is to use non-invasive methods to identify patients at risk of developing gastrointestinal varices and correlation of these non-invasive methods with the degree of esophageal varices and the presence or absence of risk signs of bleeding such as cherry red spots.
The goal of this compassionate access program is to provide early access to REP 2139-Mg for patients with HBV mono-infection or HBV / HDV co-infection who either have advanced (decompensated) cirrhosis or who have failed to response to other other antiviral agents either approved or under development and who are in danger of progressing to decompensated cirrhosis. This compassionate access program will provide access to a once weekly regimen of subcutaneously (SC) administered REP 2139-Mg for a period of 48 weeks with the goal of achieving functional cure of HDV and or HBV, with the reversal of liver disease in the absence of antiviral therapy. The safety, tolerability and efficacy of SC REP 2139-Mg will be monitored during and after therapy
Study population: All the consecutive patients of cirrhosis who are diagnosed to have large gastric varices without prior history of bleeding from GV, who came to OPD or endoscopy in Hepatology department of ILBS will be evaluated for inclusion. Study design: Prospective interventional study. The study will be conducted in the Department of Hepatology ILBS. Study period: 1.0 years Sample size: 60 This is a pilot RCT, and we decided to enroll 30 patients in each arm.
The goal of this exploratory validation study is to compare levels of expertise (or non-expertise) between GI fellows and experts with the varix trainer. The main question it aim to answer is: Can the varix trainer distinguish levels of expertise (or non-expertise) between novices and experts for specific skills (torque, small wheel and retroflexion techniques)? Does the training with the varix trainer improves these specific skills of GI fellows? Participants will do the pre-training test, practicing eight-sessions (each session is approximately 15minutes) and then do the post-training test.
This study aimed to clarify the safety of anticoagulant therapy after glue injection for cirrhotic variceal bleeding patients with portal vein thrombosis.
The purpose of the study is to determine the clinical impact of cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive treatment for Gastric Varices performed by Indiana University EUS physicians.
The aim of this study is to explore whether using endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) to assess gastric varices (GV) and giving additional treatment according to the diameter and blood flow of residual after endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for GV can reduce the rate of GV rebleeding, mortality, the risk of adverse events, and cost-effectiveness. This study is a multicenter prospective, open-label, randomized controlled study, including 5 study centers: Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, The Southwest Hospital of Army Medical University, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical University and Shanxi Coal Center Hospital. The total sample size is 150 patients, with 75 patients in the EUS evaluation group and 75 patients in the control group, respectively. The patients who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria are randomly assigned to EUS evaluation group and control group by using block randomization. The EUS evaluation group uses EUS to observe the diameter and blood flow of residual variceal veins after endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection for GV to evaluate the embolization effect. Endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection is performed again if the diameter of variceal vein is larger than 5 mm and with blood flow signal. After the injection, the blood flow signal is confirmed disappear by EUS. The control group return to the ward after endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection, without EUS evaluation. During the study, the patients are followed up for at least 12 months, and they are requested to return to the hospital for follow-up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the treatment, respectively. The data of baseline, treatment, postoperative and follow-up of the two groups are need to collect. The primary outcome of this study is rebleeding rate. Secondary outcomes are eradication rate of GV, mortality rate, retreatment, and cost-effectiveness.