View clinical trials related to Epiretinal Membrane.
Filter by:Epiretinal membrane (ERM) is a commonly encountered vitreoretinal interface anomaly with a prevalence of approximately 10% in the adult population. It is often treated with pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and membrane peeling when symptomatic. PPV is generally successful at improving visual acuity (VA) and/or metamorphopsia. At times, however, visual recovery can be hindered by macular edema in the post-vitrectomy period. Ozurdex can accelerate the resorption of intraretinal edema and hasten the improvement in the visual acuity. It has been shown to facilitate fluid absorption by both stimulating endogenous adenosine signaling in Muller cells and by down regulating vascular endothelial growth factor production. So, this study aim to investigate the efficacy of Ozurdex implant after PPV in epiretinal membrane eyes.
Many patients will have underlying maculopathy present when undergoing cataract surgery, which are not visible on fundoscopy alone. Knowledge of this underlying pathology will allow an improved consenting process and discussion with the patient regarding the risks, visual prognosis and recovery following cataract surgery. Incidental findings in the fellow eye would also allow for improved diagnosis and management of these patients without adding significant additional time to specialist high volume cataract assessment clinics.
Main objective The objective is to compare two surgical options in vitrectomies for epiretinal membranes using parameters of optical coherence tomography angiography. Background State of the art treatment for epiretinal membranes consists of pars plana vitrectomy, staining of the epiretinal membrane with a blue colouring dye and epiretinal membrane peeling. The vitrectomized space is filled with fluid (balanced salt solution) during the procedure and the fluid can optionally be replaced with air as a final step. After ERM peeling (but before the selection of the tamponade), the internal limiting membrane (the innermost layer of the retina) is either peeled as well or left untouched and the question which method should be preferred has been a hot topic in recent years. The investigators want to investigate possible effects of the used method (peeling vs. nonpeeling) on retinal perfusion parameters represented by OCTA. Two epiretinal membrane patient groups will therefore be formed: The first group's (group 1) ILM will be peeled, the second group's (group 2) ILM will not be peeled. After recruitement, patients will therefore be electronically randomized to one of the two groups. The groups will then be compared by the means of OCTA. Study design - Since there are no previous data on our research question, this investigation is defined as a pilot study. - 40 patients with epiretinal membranes will be included. This appears to be a reasonable number given the incidence of epiretinal membranes. Previous studies that compared peeling versus nonpeeling in ERM used similar sample sizes. The detectable effect size was calculated at d = 0.91. We intend to complete this pilot study within 9 months. - Randomization will be performed using electronic randomization. 20 patients each will be randomized to either group 1 or group 2. - Both eyes in each patient will be imaged. - No treatment decisions will be made based on OCTA findings. Treatment decisions will be made according to the clinic's standard of care. - Three follow-up visits specific to the study are needed. These visits will be scheduled one week, one month and three months after surgery. All other preoperative and follow-up visits will be decided by the treating physician and follow the clinic standard of care. Examinations - Distance visual acuity using ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) standard at 4 meters as per clinic standard of care. - Tonometry as per clinic standard of care. - Slit-lamp evaluation as per clinic standard of care. - Arterial blood pressure. - Axial eye length. - Heidelberg Spectralis conventional OCT. - The following 2 AngioVue scans will be taken: A. One 3mm x 3mm, 304 x 304 A-scan OCTA of the macula B. One 6mm x 6mm, 304 x 304 A-scan OCTA of the macula Hypothesis The null hypothesis of our investigation indicates that there are no statistically significant differences in OCTA perfusion parameters based on the used option. The alternative hypothesis states that there are statistically significant differences in OCTA perfusion parameters based on the used option. Primary Objective To demonstrate possible differences in OCTA perfusion parameters based on the used option. Secondary Objectives To assess the feasibility of the AngioVue optical coherence tomography angiography system in evaluating subtle changes in the retinal perfusion of patients with epiretinal membranes.
Efficiency of Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography (iOCT) Hypothesis: The use of iOCT during surgery offers the advantage of a new view of the operating field, theoretically allows more precise performance and can also change decision-making mechanisms during surgery with more precise visual control of some surgical steps (incision adaptation, differentiation of healthy and pathological tissue, placement of the implant, graft, etc.) The disadvantage is the prolongation of the operation and thus the theoretical increase in possible complications related to the operation (bleeding, infection, patient subjective problems - pain, restlessness, poorer cooperation and the resulting other possible risks, such as unexpected patient movement). Aim: Determining the effectiveness of iOCT use in different types of eye surgery. Evaluation of advantages and disadvantages of using iOCT.
Assessing metamorphopsia and quality of vision pre and post epiretinal and macular hole surgery
Vitrectomy to remove an epiretinal membrane (ERM) is one of the most common procedures performed by retinal surgeons. Patients who present with significant macular changes on optical coherence tomography (OCT) but relatively good vision are often advised to defer surgery until vision declines to 20/40 or worse. However, it is unknown if delaying surgery, which allows the foveal architecture to remain compromised and potentially to deteriorate, results in worse visual acuity outcomes than if surgery is performed earlier. In addition, there is a need to better understand predictors of outcomes when surgery is performed and predictors of progression when surgery is deferred. Finally, one of the most common presenting symptoms from an ERM is distortion or metamorphopsia. There are several objective measures of metamorphopsia but none have ever been employed to evaluate ERMs in a randomized clinical trial (RCT) and their usefulness is unknown. The purposes of this study are to better understand the optimal timing of surgery to produce the best visual result, to better understand predictors of outcomes in those who undergo surgery and predictors of progression in those whose are observed, and to better characterize and evaluate the usefulness of metamorphopsia and reading speed measures.
Aim of this study is to examine metamorphopsia before and 3 months after vitrectomy with membrane peeling among patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes. Therefore, the correlation between the Alleye App and the M-chart test before and after ERM surgery and the associations of OCT biomarkers to postsurgical changes in metamorphopsia scores will be examined.
This is a prospective, Open-label, comparative clinical study to asses two brilliant blue G dyes as staining agent in Vitro Retinal Surgery.
Several optical coherence tomography (OCT) biomarkers with potential to influence postsurgical outcomes after vitrectomy with membrane peeling for idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERM) have been described in single predictor analyses in the past. Aim of the study is to assess the reliability of diagnosis of OCT biomarkers and to calculate their impact on postsurgical visual acuity in a multiple regression analysis.
As technology advances, vitrectomy cutters are smaller and cut rates have become faster. In this prospective study, the vitrectomy efficiency and safety between 5,000 cuts per minute with 10,000 cuts per minute are compared