View clinical trials related to Enterobacteriaceae Infections.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes in patients with CRE infections.
Antimicrobial resistance is a major threat worldwide and now concerns last-ressource antibiotics such as carbapenems. As the resistance to carbapenems is directly due to their use, their spare has become a public health emergency. Their efficacy in ventilator-associated pneumonia has never been compared to other classes of antibiotics such as piperacillin-tazobactam which can be an alternative to carbapenems.
Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamases (ESBL)-Producing Enterobacteriaceae (PE) pose a major problem among antimicrobial resistance. The worldwide spread of theses bacteria may be responsible for 10 million death in 2050. Infection with ESBL-PE are associated with a worse prognosis because of delay in the start of adequate antibiotic treatment, especially for severe infections. It has been proposed to identify colonized patients to predict the risk of infection and the risk of nosocomial cross transmission. This qualitative approach has limit as only 5 to 20% of patients will develop an infection with ESBL-PE. The fecal relative abundance (RA) of ESBL-PE is a ratio of ESBL-PE among enterobacteriaceae that could identify high-risk patients of infection or cross transmission. ESBL-PE RA may be highly variable in patient with antibiotic exposure depending on the molecule received but dynamic data is missing. The aim of this study is to identify the factor that influence the fecal RA of ESBL-PE in ICU and to evaluate the association between different level of fecal RA and infection or cross transmission with an ESBL-PE.
Patients with infections caused by carbapenem-resistant enterobacteria treated with CAZ-AVI versus patients treated with BAT are compared. The BAT group includes fosfomycin, tigecycline, gentamicin, meropenem and colistin.
2:1, open-label, single center, randomized controlled trial comparing FMT vs. no intervention for CRE carriers,
The gut microbiota is critical to health and functions with a level of complexity comparable to that of an organ system. Dysbiosis, or alterations of this gut microbiota ecology, have been implicated in a number of disease states. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), defined as infusion of feces from healthy donors to affected subjects, is a method to restore a balanced gut microbiota and has attracted great interest in recent years due to its efficacy and ease of use. FMT is now recommended as the most effective therapy for CDI not responding to standard therapies. Recent studies have suggested that dysbiosis is associated with a variety of disorders, and that FMT could be a useful treatment. Randomized controlled trial has been conducted in a number of disorders and shown positive results, including alcoholic hepatitis, Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), pouchitis, irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), hepatic encephalopathy and metabolic syndrome. Case series/reports and pilot studies has shown positive results in other disorders including Celiac disease, functional dyspepsia, constipation, metabolic syndrome such as diabetes mellitus, multidrug-resistant, hepatic encephalopathy, multiple sclerosis, pseudo-obstruction, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) or Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci (VRE) infection, radiation-induced toxicity, multiple organ dysfunction, dysbiotic bowel syndrome, MRSA enteritis, Pseudomembranous enteritis, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP), and atopy. Despite FMT appears to be relatively safe and efficacious in treating a wide range of disease, its safety and efficacy in a usual clinical setting is unknown. More data is required to confirm safety and efficacy of FMT. Therefore, the investigators aim to conduct a pilot study to investigate the efficacy and safety of FMT in a variety of dysbiosis-associated disorder.
This study explores the effect of probiotic administration to decrease colonization by Carbapenem resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) in at-risk populations. Colonized patients will be randomized to receive probiotics or placebo for 14 days and reevaluated for colonization in follow up.
This is a prospective multi-center study. Bacterial isolates from hospitalized patients with CA-HRE will be compared to those from hospitalized patients with healthcare-associated HRE (HA-HRE). In addition, community spread of CRE will be determined.
This study evaluates the efficacy in achieving clinical cure in non-bacteremic urinary tract infections (UTI) caused by Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae producers of extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBL) in adult patients. Half of participants will receive Piperacillin/Tazobactam as treatment, while the other half will receive Carbapenems. The investigators will verify that Piperacillin/Tazobactam is not inferior in achieving clinical cure, and that is not associated with a higher risk of adverse events in the directed treatment of non-bacteremic UTI compared to Carbapenems. The researchers hope to improve the use of antibiotics in the non-bacteremic UTI, reducing the "collateral damage" related to a deterioration in the prognosis of patients and the generation of resistant germs caused by the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics as carbapenems.
Data regarding optimal treatment for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing Enterobacteriaceae blood-stream infection are lacking. Observational studies show conflicting results when comparing treatment with combination beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor and carbapenems. The investigators aim to evaluate the effect of definitive treatment with meropenem vs. piperacillin-tazobactam on the outcome of patients with bacteremia due to cephalosporin-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae. The investigators hypothesize that piperacillin-tazobactam is non-inferior to meropenem.