MR Imaging Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 6 to 24 Hours — MIELS  

Endovascular Thrombectomy Clinical Trial

Official title: MR Imaging Selection for Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke at 6 to 24 Hours: A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial of FVH-DWI Mismatch Versus CT/MR Perfusion

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

The acute management of stroke patients requires a fast and efficient screening imaging modality. The primary modalities used to select patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and CT/MR perfusion. The investigators prospectively assessed MRI and CTP concordance/discordance and correlated the imaging on both with EVT treatment decisions and clinical outcomes to verify the validity of MRI (FVH-DWI mismatch) for the preoperative assessment of EVT in patients with an extended time window (6h to 24h).

Clinical Trial Description

The efficacy and safety of endovascular thrombectomy(EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke(AIS) due to anterior circulation large vessel occlusion(LVO) is well established in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in late (treatment) time windows (6-16hours),and compared with medical therapy, EVT can significantly improve the prognosis. DEFUSE 3(EndovascularTherapy FollowingImagingEvaluationforIschemicStroke3)andDAWN (DWIorCTPAssessmentWithClinicalMismatchintheTriageof Wake-UpandLatePresentingStrokesUndergoing NeurointerventionWithTrevo) reliedonCT-perfusion(CTP) or magneticresonancediffusion(DWI)and/orperfusion(PWI), and utilized automated imaging analysis with Rapid Processing of Perfusion and Diffusion (RAPID; iSchemaView, Menlo Park, CA) software to determine eligibility[2,3,4].Some use cerebral infarction volume, presence or absence of cerebral hemorrhage and bleeding tendency, arterial occlusion location, perfusion parameters (CBV<70 mL; The gold standard for mismatch ratio ≥1.8; mismatch volume >15 ml) toassess patients who were compatible with acute anterior circulation LVO ischemic stroke undergoing arterial thrombectomy. The advantages of using perfusion imaging assessment are the ability to identify DWI-negative cerebral ischaemia, objectively evaluate ischemic semi-dark bands, and identify some cases of overperfusion. However, for most centers, CT OR MRperfusion in the emergency department is limited, or the appropriate analysis software is not available, and even imaging equipment does not support perfusion. As a result, most of the centers use multiparametric MR to screen EVT-eligible LVO patients. In the study of DAWN，researchers use MR and some complicated criterias such as clinical symptom-imaging mismatch, the relationship between age and NIHSS score to select patients who meet 6-24hours with acute anterior circulation LVO, It wasa certain complex way to used in clinical work, and difficult to promoting the application clinically. All the acute ischemic stroke protocols are trying to find a way to balance theoptimal screening assessment of EVT patients (with)and minimal imaging time to facilitate rapid and effective treatment. Fast multiparametric MR sequences typically include DWI, FLAIR, MRA, and gradient echo(GRE) sequences, further reducing the time and versatility of multiparametricMRI scans, requiring more informations to be extracted from fewer sequences. Early researches described that a rounded or serpentine brightening of the parenchyma or cortical surface bordering the subarachnoid space in FLIAR sequence on MRI scan is called fluid attenuation inversion recovery vascular hyperintensity(FVH). In a prospective study, slow blood flow on the FLAIR sequence was associated with cerebral collateral circulation and prognosis [12].At the same time, it has been suggested that FVH in the FLAIR sequence of the MRI scan sequence can indirectly indicate LVO or vascular stenosis, and insufficient collateral circulation leads to FVH and early ischemia [1]. According to our completed retrospective study, FVH-DWI mismatch assessment and perfusion assessment showed good interrater reliability（ κ= 0.71，[95% CI, 0.62-0.81]). There is no statistical difference in the rate of good clinical prognosis of patients undergoing EVT based on the two evaluation methods(X2=0.204，P=0.652). It has been found that FVHsign is an indicator of LVO or vascular stenosis, inadequate collateral circulation leading to slow blood flow and early ischaemia. The presence of the FVH sign is not only fairly consistent with areas of low perfusion, but its sensitivity and specificity is similar to that of time-flight magnetic resonance angiography(MRA) for the diagnosis of large vessel occlusion.DWI volume and FVH-DWI mismatch in acute stroke patients might be useful for predicting functional outcome after stroke[10]. It was thus hypothesized that FVH sign could be an important and convenient imaging manifestation reflecting the under-perfusion of brain tissue in patients with cerebral infarction with LVO. . In this study, a randomised controlled approach was adopted to assess the risk and prognosis of endovascular treatment by using the "FVH-DWI mismatch" to determine the presence of an ischemic penumbra and collateral circulation in patients, with the aim of establishing a simple evaluation method based on the indirect evaluation of collateral circulation on MR to screen patients who underwent thrombolysis at 6 to 24 hours overtime. It may be similar to the perfuse evaluation system, but is more easily replicable. ;

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Endovascular Thrombectomy
• Ischemic Stroke

• NCT number: NCT05735301
• Study type: Interventional
• Source: Tianjin Huanhu Hospital
• Contact: Ming Wei, doctorate
• Phone: 13502182903
• Email: drweiming@163.com
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 1, 2019
• Completion date: May 2024