View clinical trials related to Endotracheal Intubation.
Filter by:The goal of this clinical trials is to analyze the effects of using bougies as adjuncts on the performance of endotracheal intubation via video laryngoscopy during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in anesthesia residents. The main question it aims to answer is whether bougie use has a significant effect on first-attempt failure of endotracheal intubation via video laryngoscopy during continuous chest compressions. Participants will perform endotracheal intubation via video laryngoscopy by four methods in a randomized order in a simulated cardiopulmonary resuscitation scenario on a manikin. The four methods are endotracheal intubations assisted by a railroaded bougie, assisted by a preloaded bougie, assisted by a stylet, and with no assistance. Researchers will compare the first-attempt failure rate of the four methods to see if a railroaded bougie method has a significant different first-attempt failure from that of the other three methods.
The purpose of this research is to learn about the difference in the endotracheal intubation condition (ease of using a device to view vocal cords, position of vocal cords, and patient's reaction to endotracheal tube insertion) and determining the appropriate time to perform the intubation.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether the forearm-supported head extension decreases dental contact between laryngoscope blade and maxillary incisors during direct laryngoscopy
This study with children under 1 age of elective surgery as the research subjects, according to the cross diameter, compared with the traditional method of empirical catheter model, analyze the success rate, completion time of intubation, endotracheal intubation attempts and complications, explore the clinical value of pediatric endotracheal technology, to provide new ideas and methods for clinical practice.
COVALENT is a randomized, controlled, multi-center study that aims to evaluate the clinical routine practice of endotracheal intubation in an operative setting comparing video-assisted laryngoscopy to direct laryngoscopy.
A subset of patients with COVID-19 develops acute respiratory failure and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (1). The use of invasive mechanical ventilation for the treatment of these conditions is associated with high mortality rates (2,3). The use of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) and awake prone position (AW-PP) could to decrease the need for endotracheal intubation and other adverse clinical outcomes (4-6). The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical results of the simultaneous application of high-flow nasal oxygen therapy HFNO and awake-prone position in a cohort of patients with severe respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19 on relevant clinical outcomes, and to assess risk factors of treatment failure defined as requirement of invasive mechanical ventilation.
In this study, the investigators evaluate the effect of head positions (simple extension vs. sniffing position vs. head elevation) on endotracheal intubation using a videolaryngoscope.
This study aims to evaluate the effect preoperative chewing gums for 2 or 4 minutes on postoperative sore throat after general anesthesia using an endotracheal tube.
Endotracheal intubation is a frequent procedure in the operating room, in intensive care units and in emergency medicine (in- or out-of-hospital) but optimal Macintosh blade size remains unknown to date.
To study the advantages of visual laryngeal mask combined with endotracheal intubation in general anesthesia surgery, we compared intubation time, intubation times and intubation success rate of endotracheal intubation through laryngeal mask airway under visual and non-visual conditions, at the same time, the laryngeal mask displacement rate, volume of secretion in airway, the incidence of laryngeal spasm, the incidence and severity of postoperative oropharyngeal pain were also compared between two groups.