View clinical trials related to End of Life.
Filter by:A prospective, single-blinded, controlled, and randomized trial to find if physician's use of the Portuguese Advance Directives, in palliative care, as a communication tool between patients and caregivers, improves the agreement and reliability between patients and their health surrogates, in their decisions about end-of-life care.
The practice of providing palliative care in the situation of the COVID-19 pandemic in the perspective of physicians and nurses - survey study (PEOpLe-C19 study)
Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: palliative care recommends discussing advance care planning (ACP) when patients' estimated life expectancy is reduced from a year to months. Discussions about ACP focus on communication among patients, their caregivers, and healthcare providers to achieve cancer-related treatment and care consistent with the patient's preferences based on their values and goals. ACP can improve outcomes for patients and caregivers; however, provision of ACP to patients remain low. This may be because of the complexity of ACP in clinical practice. A Question Prompt List (QPL) is a structured question list encouraging patients to put forward their queries to physicians and promote discussion between patients and physicians during medical consultations. Our preliminary study found that for patients with advanced cancer after standard chemotherapy, face-to-face interventions by nurses or clinical psychologists using a QPL about treatment and care, which is consistent with the patient's preferences based on their values and goals promoted empathetic communication between patients and their physicians. In recent years, however, ensuring adequate time during outpatient visits has become difficult due to increased numbers of outpatients and shortages of corresponding medical personnel. Therefore, intervention methods not restricted by location or time are needed. Thus, the investigators develop a mobile-based empathetic communication support program, including a QPL, to facilitate discussions about patients' values and goals with their physicians. Purpose: This study examines whether a mobile-based empathetic communication support program, which intends to promote ACP discussions in earlier stages of advanced cancer treatment, improves such communication behaviors of patients with advanced cancer and their physicians. Main contents of the intervention: Patients in the intervention group are provided a mobile-based empathetic communication support program-a mobile application (app). The app comprises a QPL (46 questions in eight categories) and questions about the patient's preferred treatment and end-of-life care based on their values and goals. After registering on the app, patients are first given a program overview and instructions for using the app. Then, they proceed with the content themselves, at home or anywhere else, at any time. Between app registration and the next outpatient visit, the patient is interviewed (by phone or in person) by a nurse or a clinical psychologist, who helps them prepare for the discussion with the physician and asks questions based on the patient's app responses for 30 minutes to an hour. During the outpatient visit, patients and their physicians are provided feedback based on the interview. Study participants: Overall, 264 patients with advanced or recurrent cancer are recruited from four departments (respiratory medicine, gastroenterology, hepatobiliary medicine, and oncology) in the outpatient clinic of the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Outcome measurement: The primary outcome of this trial is the Reassurance and Emotional support score of physician behavior measured using the SHARE model at the first visit after the intervention. SHARE is a conceptual communication skills model comprising 26 items and four subscales, categorized as S: Supportive environment, H: How to deliver bad news, A: Additional information, and RE: Reassurance and Emotional support. Reassurance and Emotional support assesses physicians' behavior in providing reassurance and addressing patients' emotions with empathetic responses (e.g., remaining silent out of concern for patient's feelings or accepting patient's expression of emotions). The conversation between patients and the physicians is audio-recorded, and a third person's impression of the physician's communication behavior during the outpatient consultation is scored on a 5-point scale from 0: not applicable at all to 4: strongly applicable. Scoring will be conducted by multiple raters blinded to the assignment. Raters are trained in conversation analysis with a manual, and inter- and intra-rater agreements will be checked in advance. Secondary outcomes are as follows: 1) the patient-physician behavioral assessment based on the conversation analysis manual, 2) number of conversations about ACP, 3) psychological distress, 4) quality of life, 5) medical care use, 6) app use, 7) feasibility of intervention program, 8) patients' satisfaction of the consultation, 9) care goals, and 10) preferred place for future care. The investigators chose these outcomes for their comparability with previous studies.
People with advanced and life-threatening illnesses experience challenges across multiple domains of function including physical, psychological, social, and spiritual. The benefits of non-pharmacological interventions for palliative care patients are well recognized, but are relatively under-utilized. Virtual Reality (VR) therapy may help address these challenges and be a valuable addition to the current therapies used in palliative care. VR is a computer generated, three-dimensional environment that individuals can explore and interact with using specialized equipment such as a head-mounted display with internal sensors. VR has been increasingly adapted for applications in healthcare, as a simulation for medical training and an intervention tool to impact pain management, stress and anxiety. VR has the potential to improve both physical and psychological symptoms in patients with terminal illnesses. The current study is a small randomized controlled trial to understand the impact of VR on physical symptoms, psychological symptoms and quality of life in patients at the end of life. Participants will be randomized to a single comparator session, single session of standard VR, or single session of personalized VR. The comparator arm will consist of participants viewing an ordinary two-dimensional video on an iPad such as a peaceful nature scene. The standard VR arm will consist of participants viewing a "bucket list" experience self-selected from a VR library i.e. an experience the participant desires but has never experienced. The personalized VR arm will consist of participants viewing content that is personally meaningful to them. This content will be obtained through either a) family/friends creating a personalized video (e.g. video footage of their summer cottage) or b) the participant will select an experience from the VR library that is personally meaningful (e.g. visiting their honeymoon destination, exploring their childhood hometown, etc.) if option a) is not possible. Participants will complete self-report questionnaires about their physical and psychological symptoms and quality of life before and after the intervention (two days and seven days post intervention). Participants will also complete a feedback survey to evaluate their satisfaction with the intervention. Surveys will be administered by the research assistant.
This is a randomized pilot study to test the feasibility and acceptability of a patient decision aid on conservative care among older patients with advanced CKD and their close persons.
The investigators propose to conduct a feasibility study of identifying high-risk ICU patients using previously validated integrated prediction model and employing early palliative care intervention. The study will consist of two four-month time periods: usual care in time period one and usual care plus targeted pro-active palliative care intervention within 48 hours of ICU admission in time period two.
The purpose of this study is to test the effect of the "Best Case/Worse Case" (BC/WC) communication tool on receipt of palliative care and intensity of treatment at the end of life, quality of life, and quality of communication for older patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving outpatient care at ten nephrology clinics. The intervention was developed and tested with acute care surgical patients at the University of Wisconsin (UW) and is now being testing to see if the intervention will work in a different setting. The intervention will be tested with 320 older adults who have end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and are receiving care from a nephrologist enrolled in the study. Randomly assigned nephrologists within each site will receive the intervention (training to use the BC/WC tool) or to be in the waitlist control, meaning that they will not be offered BC/WC training until the end of the study, when all participants have been enrolled. Participants will be on follow up with surveys and chart review for up to two years after study enrollment. Caregivers will also be invited to participate and complete surveys.
Undertreated patient symptoms and resulting acute care use require approaches that improve symptom-burden. Previously a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention was developed for patients with cancer. In pilot work, the intervention was associated with improvements in patient symptom burden and reductions in healthcare use and costs of care at the end of life. This intervention will be expanded across several clinics to evaluate the impact of the LHW intervention on with cancer and the LHW will be trained to refer patients to palliative care. This randomized intervention will evaluate the effect on healthcare use, total costs, palliative care and hospice referral.
This prospective cluster-randomized trial examines the efficacy of a novel communication intervention delivered by trained physician and nurse dyads to parents of children with cancer within the clinicians' practice, to foster alignment of the goals of treatment. The investigators hypothesize that goal alignment will improve quality of life outcomes, in particular for those patients who reach end of life. Findings from the proposed research will provide essential information to promote communication practice standards that can be rapidly translated into practice to improve outcomes for children, particularly those who reach end of life, and parents.
Undertreated patient symptoms and resulting acute care use require approaches that improve symptom-burden. Previously a a lay health worker (LHW)-led symptom screening intervention was developed for patients with advanced cancer. This intervention will be expanded to all patients with cancer and the LHW will be trained to refer patients to palliative care and behavioral health. This intervention will evaluate the effect on symptom-burden, survival, healthcare use, and total costs.