Clinical Trials Logo

Empyema, Pleural clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Empyema, Pleural.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT03873766 Completed - Empyema, Pleural Clinical Trials

Management of Pleural Space Infections

Start date: April 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Currently, there is no high-quality evidence comparing the clinical outcomes and cost effectiveness of surgical drainage combined with antibiotics versus dual-agent intrapleural fibrinolytic therapy (IPFT) catheter drainage of pleural space infections with concomitant antibiotic therapy. The absence of comparative data is a challenge for surgical and medical services in clinical decision-making for this common and morbid condition. This is a pilot study comparing surgical drainage of the pleural space in complex pleural effusions to bedside chest tube drainage using dual agent IPFT with the intent to inform on study algorithm and endpoint performance in anticipation of a multi-institutional randomized clinical trial.

NCT ID: NCT03584113 Recruiting - Empyema, Pleural Clinical Trials

VATS Decortication Versus IR Guided Chest Tube Insertion With Fibrinolytics for the Management of Empyema

DICE
Start date: August 24, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The American Association of Thoracic Surgery defines empyema as pus in the pleural space. It is a common thoracic surgery presentation with an estimated 65,000 cases occurring annually in the United States. Despite the high prevalence of empyemas, there has been no consensus as to its optimal first line management. Methods of acceptable treatment currently include chest tube insertion (thoracostomy), thoracostomy with fibrinolytics, decortication via a thoracotomy (removal of fibrous peel on the lung) and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) decortication. The investigators aim to determine the rate of re-intervention within thirty days for adults presenting with empyema in the fibrinopurulent phase by comparing the initial treatments of Interventional Radiology (IR) guided chest tube insertion with intrapleural fibrinolytics (as per Multi-Institutional Sepsis 2 Trial; MIST 2 Trial) versus VATS decortication. Currently, either of these treatments is considered first-line depending on the surgeon and institutional preference.

NCT ID: NCT03583931 Completed - Coagulopathy Clinical Trials

Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion With Fibrinolytic Therapy Versus VATs Decortication

Start date: July 26, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study aims to standardize the treatment of pleural space (parapneumonic) infections by comparing the difference in outcomes between 2 methods of treatment: early VATS (Video Assisted Thorascopic Surgery) decortication versus fibrinolytic therapy. During treatment, the patient's coagulopathy status will also be evaluated.

NCT ID: NCT02958683 Completed - Surgery Clinical Trials

Chest Wall Motion Analysis in Disease

CWM
Start date: July 2011
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Breathing movements, called chest wall motion, are very complex. The investigators are studying how movement of the abdomen, ribs and diaphragm contribute to breathing and how this differs with different diseases in the chest. Breathing movements may help with diagnosis, assessment of severity or assessing the impact of treatments for chest conditions. The investigators are following people who have a chest disease, measuring their chest wall motion and comparing it to their diagnosis and and how their treatment works. Chest wall motion can be measured in different ways at rest and whilst exercising. Small stickers on the chest can be used to reflect infra red light or visible squares of light can be shone onto the chest without using stickers.

NCT ID: NCT02165891 Recruiting - Empyema, Pleural Clinical Trials

Comparison of Intrapleural Urokinase and Video-Assisted Thorascopic Surgery in the Treatment of Parapneumonic Pleural Effusion in Children

UROVATS
Start date: February 2015
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Despite the improvement in the technology available for diagnosing and treating empyema, the management of empyema in children remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of two common technical approach used for pleural effusion drainage in the treatment of childhood empyema.

NCT ID: NCT01717742 Completed - Pleural Empyema Clinical Trials

Intrapleural DNase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator in Pediatric Empyema (DTPA Trial)

Start date: December 2012
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Bacterial pneumonia can be complicated by the development of excess fluid and pus (pleural empyema) around the lungs in children. The incidence of pleural empyema in children has increased significantly in the last 10 years. Short term morbidity for this condition is substantial, but unlike in adults, the long term outcome of this condition for children in developed countries is favourable. Inserting a chest drain and then adding a medicine (tissue plasminogen activator - tPA) to break down organized pus has been shown to be an effective therapy for reducing the duration of illness. However, this treatment is still suboptimal and prolonged hospitalization is common. Recent data from adults suggests that adding an additional medicine (DNase) to decrease the viscosity (thickness) of the fluid improves drainage and leads to better patient outcomes; however, there are no published studies on children. This is a multi-centre randomized controlled trial comparing the time to discharge from hospital after chest drain insertion in previously well children who present with pleural empyema, treated with intrapleural DNase and tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) by chest drain for three doses over 48 hours compared with three doses over 48 hours of tPA alone. Other outcomes related to effectiveness, safety and cost will be assessed as well.

NCT ID: NCT01246453 Completed - Pleural Effusion Clinical Trials

Efficacy and Security of Intrapleurally Alteplase vs Urokinase for the Treatment of Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Empyema

Start date: December 2003
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

1. Objectives: - Main objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrapleural alteplase vs urokinase in patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema. - To evaluate the pleural and plasmatic levels of the fibrinolytic system markers after the treatment with alteplase vs urokinase - To evaluate the safety of alteplase in the treatment of complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusion and empyema 2. Design: Multicentric, randomized, parallel, controlled and double blind 3. Main variable: Percentage of curation 4. Study population and number of patients: 204 patients with complex complicated parapneumonic pleural effusions and empyema 5. Duration of the treatment: Three days (main variable), and optional three days (secondary variable)

NCT ID: NCT01011881 Completed - Pleural Empyema Clinical Trials

Procalcitonin in Pleural Pleuritis

Start date: October 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The purpose of this study is to determine pleural level of procalcitonin in differents situations of pleuritis.

NCT ID: NCT00502632 Recruiting - Pleural Empyema Clinical Trials

Dornase Alfa and Urokinase for Kids With Pleural Empyema

DUKE
Start date: October 2007
Phase: Phase 2/Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intrapleural treatment with Dornase alfa plus Urokinase improves clinical outcome compared to Urokinase alone in children with complicated parapneumonic effusions

NCT ID: NCT00234208 Terminated - Pleural Empyema Clinical Trials

Early Medical Thoracoscopy Versus Simple Chest Tube Drainage in Complicated Parapneumonic Effusion and Pleural Empyema

Start date: October 2005
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

Multicenter, randomized controlled study to compare early mini-invasive thoracoscopy to simple chest tube drainage in complicated parapneumonic effusions or pleural empyema. 100 patients will be recruited. Follow-up will be 3 months. It will be looked at the rate medical cure, the need for secondary interventions, death and duration of hospital stay. In a nested trial in 20 patients the intrapleural pharmacokinetics of linezolid (approved antibiotic agent) will be measured.