View clinical trials related to Emotional Disorders.
Filter by:The UP-C is a manualized, cognitive-behavioral, and emotion-focused group intervention with a transdiagnostic approach aimed at the treatment of emotional problems (i.e., anxiety and depression) in children aged 7 to 12 years old. This psychological intervention mainly focuses on reducing the intensity and frequency of strong and aversive emotional experiences in children through the development of skills that allow them to face these emotions in a more adaptive way. By targeting the factors common to emotional disorders (avoidance, emotional reactivity, affective intolerance) we believe this intervention might increase the effectiveness of the treatment of these difficulties (mainly in the cases where comorbidity is present). It may also contribute to therapists' expertise when dealing with different emotional disorders, by not requiring the simultaneous mastery of multiple interventions, to a reduction of costs associated with training and to the planning of more individualized and flexible interventions. This approach could help to make interventions suitable for a set of problems more accessible to the public - which is particularly relevant to the Portuguese context. Thus, to better adapt to the limitations existent in mental health services in Portugal, a modified version of the UP-C was developed by reducing the number of sessions for parents. The current study seeks to understand whether this adapted version of the UP-C - the UP-C/C - less demanding in terms of resources required for its application, is effective in reducing children's emotional symptomatology and produces changes on maladaptive parenting strategies used by parents. This version is mostly centered on the child, who participates in 15, 90 minutes, group sessions. In this version of the program, the parents adopt the role of "cotherapists", and support homework completion at home by the child. They also have access to psychoeducational material (in video and written format). Additionally, the UP-C/C includes three parental sessions that focus on parenting strategies shown to be useful in challenging situations. This study also seeks to evaluate child and parent involvement in the intervention and understand its predictors. These are the specific objectives of the study: 1. To evaluate the efficacy of the UP-C/C through a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial with two conditions (UP-C/C and Coping Cat in group format) on the primary outcomes (child's anxiety and depression symptoms, interference of anxiety and depression in the child's school, social and family functioning), secondary (quality of life, emotional expression and cognitive errors), and on the transdiagnostic factors (avoidance, emotional reactivity, affective intolerance) and on the parental variables (parents' emotional behaviors, orientation towards the child's emotions, symptoms of anxiety and depression); 2. To evaluate the involvement of the child and parents in the program (attendance, dropout, active participation) and find out its predictors (age; intensity of symptoms; readiness for change; therapeutic alliance; expectations regarding the intervention). The main hypothesis of the study, relating to the efficacy study, is the following: - UP-C/C is expected to have equivalent results to Group Coping Cat in outcomes related to anxiety and quality of life and superior results in outcomes related to depression and transdiagnostic mechanisms.
Depression and anxiety are frequently comorbid and share mechanisms contributing to dysfunction. Transdiagnostic approaches, such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy, streamline intervention and allow a broader population to benefit in a cost-effective fashion. Brief ACT interventions targeting at-risk individuals have the potential to prevent negative outcomes. Delivering these in a digital format overcomes attitudinal and structural barriers to accessing treatment.
The DE-GIP study compares the efficacy and differential efficacy of two manualized psychodynamic psychotherapies for emotional disorders. The study therefore has two independent aims: A) The first aim is to test the hypothesized non-inferiority (NI margin: 5 points in PHQ-ADS, requiring N = 152 for a one-sided α = 0.025 and 1-ß = 0.80) of Guided Imagery Psychotherapy for Emotional Disorders (GIP-EMO) to the established Unified Psychodynamic Protocol for Emotional Disorders (UPP-EMO). The primary outcome is anxiety and depression severity (as measured by the PHQ-ADS) 12 months after the beginning of treatment. B) The second aim is to assess whether GIP-EMO is more effective for patients meeting the GIP suitability criteria (as measured by the Suitability Questionnaire for Guided Imagery Psychotherapy) than for patients who do not meet these criteria. Furthermore, it will be tested whether GIP-EMO is more effective than UPP-EMO for patients who meet the GIP suitability criteria.
The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a Transdiagnostic Internet-based Protocol (Emotion Regulation Protocol) for the treatment of Emotional Disorders (ED) (major depression disorder, dysthymic disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder and four anxiety disorders: panic disorder, agoraphobia, generalized anxiety disorder, and social anxiety disorder) both in terms of efficacy regarding depressive and anxiety symptomatology and its potential impact on higher-order psychological dimensions (neuroticism/behavioral inhibition and low positive affect/behavioral activation) in a community sample. It will also be tested the differential effect of a specific treatment component based on positive psychology techniques in positive affect. The main hypotheses are: 1) both modalities of the protocol (TP and TP+PA) will be more effective than the WL condition in the primary outcome measures. Investigators also expect scores on positive affect to be higher in the TP+PA condition than in the TP condition.
The purpose of this study is to develop a new psychological therapy for a variety of different types of emotional disorders. The study will compare symptoms and functioning of clients who receive the treatment with those who do not, and will include a number of assessments before, during, and after treatment. We predict that patients receiving active treatment will show improved functioning relative to wait-list control.