View clinical trials related to Embolism, Pulmonary.
Filter by:Retrospectively analyze the risk factors of VTE in 5774 patients with thoracic trauma from 33 hospitals in China, and established a risk prediction model
In an open-label parallel groups blinded-endpoint randomized clinical trial, the investigators aim to assess the safety and efficacy of conventional catheter-directed thrombolysis (CDT) vs anticoagulation monotherapy on outcomes of patients with acute intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism. The investigators hypothesize that CDT will have a superior efficacy and safety compared with anticoagulation-only therapy regarding the proportion of patients with a right ventricle to left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio > 0.9 at a 3-month follow-up by an imaging core laboratory, major bleeding, severe thrombocytopenia, or vascular access complication.
Thromboprophylaxis for liver surgery can be commenced either preoperatively or postoperatively. Despite a clear trade-off between thrombosis and bleeding in liver surgery patients, there is no international consensus when thrombosis prophylaxis should be commenced in patients undergoing liver surgery. As far as we know, there are no prospective randomized trials in this field, and current guidelines are unfortunately based on very low quality evidence, that is, a few retrospective studies and expert opinion. Both American and European thromboprophylaxis guidelines for abdominal cancer surgery support the preoperative initiation of thromboprophylaxis, but these guidelines do not specifically address the increased bleeding risk associated with liver surgery. On the contrary, Dutch guidelines recommend postoperative thromboprophylaxis only, because of lack of evidence for preoperative thromboprophylaxis. Traditionally, many liver surgery units have been reluctant in using preoperative thromboprophylaxis due to the potentially increased risk of bleeding complications. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Society Guidelines recommend preoperative thromboprophylaxis in liver surgery, but the guidelines provide no supporting evidence for this recommendation. Overall, the amount of evidence is scarce and somewhat contradictory in this clinically relevant field of thromboprophylaxis in liver surgery. The aim of this study is to compare pre- and postoperatively initiated thromboprophylaxis regimens in liver surgery in a randomized controlled trial.
Pulmonary Embolism (PE) is a frequent disease, the third cause of cardiovascular death after stroke and myocardial infarction. According to European guidelines of European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of European Respiratory Society (ERS), the prognostic stratification of PE severity is mandatory as soon as PE is diagnosed. This stratification includes the hemodynamic status, and specific tools : the assessment of the sPESI score, and the evaluation of PE's impact on right ventricle (RV) : increased biomarkers (troponin, BNP) and right ventricle/left ventricle (RV/LV) ratio. the RV/LV ration may be evaluated ideally by transthoracic echo (TTE), or by CT scan. Unfortunately, only 10% of patients with PE are evaluated with TTE by a cardiologist in the initial time of PE diagnosis. Hence, the CT scan is the most frequent way to assess RV/LV ratio. However, CT is not possible for all patients (patients with contra-indication) or may have difficulties to provide a clear assessment because of technical issues. Then, there is a need for morphological evaluation of RV as soon as PE is diagnosed, in every clinical setting. The improvement in technologies allowed the development of clinical echography (CE) in emergency departments. CE is already available, non-invasive, less expansive, and may be a good way to assess RV/LV ratio in patients with PE diagnosed in emergency departments. The investigators propose a prospective, multicenter study to assess the sensitivity of CE in patients with PE, compared to CT scan to detect RV/LV ≥0.9.
Computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is the imaging method of choice to rule out acute pulmonary embolism based on its high sensitivity and specificity. Unfortunately, CTPA uses iodinated contrast media and can provoke contrast induced nephropathy. On the other hand, Computed tomography uses ionising radiation and is responsible for the half of the radiation exposure coming from medical sources. Recent studies have proven that low-dose CTPA protocols using Computed tomography tube energy of 80 kVp and reduced volume of iodinated contrast media provide an increased vessel signal and good image quality at a significantly reduced patient exposure. However, there are no data on the sensitivity of low-kVp protocols. The aim of this prospective randomized trial is to detect any difference between a normal-dose and a low-dose CTPA protocol in the diagnostic accuracy in the detection of acute pulmonary embolism (PE).
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy (as measured by the rate of recurrent symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism [VTE] (i.e., Pulmonary thromboembolism [PE] and Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT])) and safety of GSK576428 as the initial treatment in subjects with acute PE in an open-label design.