Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT04771481 |
Other study ID # |
RP021 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Completed |
Phase |
Phase 4
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
April 10, 2021 |
Est. completion date |
October 8, 2022 |
Study information
Verified date |
September 2023 |
Source |
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
The presence of blood clot in stomach limited quality of endoscopic view ,which affect
successful rate of hemostatic endoscopy in patient with acute upper gastrointestinal
bleeding. The study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy of metoclopramide, as pro-kinetic agent
,for gastric visualization in the patient with acute UGIB; double-blind randomized controlled
trial and two centers study. The patient were randomly assigned to receive either
metoclopramide (10mg) intravenously or placebo before endoscopy 30-120 min. The primary
endpoint was endoscopic yield, assessed by objective gastric visualized scoring systems.
Secondary end points include duration of endoscope, technical success rate, the need for
second-look EGD, units of blood transfusion, length of hospital stay and 30-day rebleeding
rate.
Description:
- Double-blind, Double centers, RCT
- All endoscopists at two participating sites attend the pre-study meeting for
standardization of protocol and scoring system.
- Eligible patients were randomly assigned to either metoclopramide or placebo group in a
1:1 conceal allocation according to a computer-generated randomization list with block
randomization in size of four.
- Assigned treatment was kept in opaque sealed envelopes.
- Before EGD, the patients had adequate resuscitation to maintain stable hemodynamics(SBP
≥ 90 mmHg and/or HR < 100 bpm) and blood transfusion to reach Hb> 7g/dL and correct
coagulopathy.
- EGD is performed in left lateral position, under local lidocaine anesthesia alone or
combined with IV anesthetics
- The standardized set of endoscopic landmarks, including the esophagus, gastro-esophageal
junction, fundus, gastric body, incisura, antrum, duodenal bulb, and second part of the
duodenum were examined.
- To assess endoscopic gastric visualization, we applied simple validate objective scoring
system and estimated coverage of blood clot on mucosa on reference endoscopies view in 4
locations, including fundus, corpus, antrum and duodenal bulb.
- Each location is scored between 0 and 2; Score 0 (worst vision) < 25% of the surface was
visible; Score 1 25-75% visible surface; Score 2 (best vision), > 75% visible surface (
total score range 0-8)
- 'Adequate visualization' defined as total score six or higher (out of 8).
- All photos of endoscopic landmark, including the reference endoscopic views of four
locations (fundus, corpus antrum and duodenal bulb), were taken and internally validated
by another endoscopist who was blinded to the randomization allocation.
- The duration of the endoscopy was recorded from beginning to end of the procedure in
minute.
- The 72-hour recurrent GI bleeding was documented and re-EGD was performed to confirm
rebleeding if the following conditions were met
: I) hematemesis or bloody NG > 6 hours after endoscopy; II) melena after normalization
of stool color; III) hematochezia after normalization of stool color or melena; IV)
development of tachycardia (HR ≥ 110 bpm) or hypotension(SBP ≤ 90 mmHg) after ≥ 1 hour
of vital sign stability without other cause; V) hemoglobin drop of ≥ 2 g/dL after two
consecutive stable hemoglobin values ( < 0.5 g/dL decrease) ≥ 3 hours apart; VI)
tachycardia or hypotension that does not resolve within 8 hours after index endoscopy
despite appropriate resuscitation (in the absence of an alternative explanation),
associated with persistent melena or hematochezia or; VII) persistently dropping
hemoglobin of > 3 g/dL in 24 hours associated with persistent melena or hematochezia.
- 30-day rebleeding is accessed by direct phone call to patient.