Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Not yet recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT04562493
Other study ID # FMBSUREC/01122019/Hussein
Secondary ID
Status Not yet recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date October 5, 2020
Est. completion date April 5, 2021

Study information

Verified date September 2020
Source Beni-Suef University
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Chronic lumbar radicular (CLR) pain is a term used to describe neuropathic pain symptoms in the distribution of a particular lumbar nerve root due to disc protrusion, spinal stenosis, facet hypertrophy, or fibrosis after previous surgery. The pathophysiology of CLR pain involves mechanical, inflammatory, and immunologic factors that affect the function of the dorsal root ganglion (DRG).1Treatment methods include oral pain medications, physical therapy, epidural steroid injection (ESI) and surgery, among others. Both ESI and surgery appear to result in short-term pain relief relative to more conservative measures, yet neither is clearly superior to observation at 1-year follow-up (2,3).

Lumbar epidural steroid injection (LESI) was first suggested as a conservative treatment for radicular pain in 1952 by Robecchi and Capra,4 and it has since become one of the most commonly utilized conservative interventions for radiculopathy.5 Steroids are used to reduce inflammation in the epidural space.6-10 LESI is performed via a transforaminal (TF), caudal (C), or interlaminar (IL) approach in the lumbar spine; these approaches offer different advantages and disadvantages, which may result in different outcomes.11-14 The TF approach is perhaps the most favored because the injection site is adjacent to the nerve root, and only a small volume of medication is required for injection.15 The C route is both the easiest and the safest route and also seems to provide the most favorable analgesic effects. However, this approach requires relatively large volumes of medication and is less specific to the site of pathology.16 Previous studies have described the effectiveness of these methods in the management of radiculopathy.17-22 Magnesium sulfate has not been familiar to anesthesiologists until recently. It has drawn much attention in the field of anesthesiology,23,24 resulting in numerous publications of clinical studies, 25 review articles, and meta-analyses. 26 Based on its diverse roles in cellular functions, magnesium sulfate has been suggested to prevent excitotoxicity by its neuroprotective effects.27 Magnesium can antagonize NMDA receptor channels by blocking calcium influx in a voltage-gated manner. Intravenous administration of magnesium is efficacious in the management of various conditions associated with neuropathic pain. 28,29 Collins and colleagues reported that 70 mg/kg magnesium sulphate infusions in 4 hours for 5 days reduced pain in patients with complex regional pain syndrome. 30 Neuraxial administration of magnesium is an "off-label" use However, animal studies 31,32 showed that intrathecally administered magnesium was free of neurotoxicity, and recent studies have demonstrated the safety of magnesium administration via the epidural route in humans33,34.35 Recently, ozone therapy has emerged as an alternative or additional treatment option for patients with lumbar disc prolapse. Ozone (O 3 ) is an allotropic form of oxygen, primarily known for its ecological properties, industrial application and therapeutic effects. Questions persist concerning its potential toxicity as an oxidant agent versus its reported clinical efficacy. Several mechanisms of action have been proposed to explain the efficacy of ozone therapy including analgesic, anti-inflammatory and oxidant action. The O2-O3 gas mixture injected proximal to the root ganglion is thought to normalize the levels of cytokines and prostaglandins, increase superoxide dismutase levels minimize reactive oxidant species and improve local periganglionic circulation with eutropic effect on the nerve root36,37 Much concern was directed towardsthe contribution of oxidative stress to the pathophysiology of disc prolapse. More and more researchers devote themselves to elucidating the association between oxidative stress and disc degeneration. Antioxidative therapy is suggested as a promising therapeutic approach for preventing or retarding the establishment and progression of disc degeneration. The effect of interventional pain procedures for lumbar disc prolapse on oxidative stress biomarkers such as Glutathione and superoxide dismutase (SOD) remains unknown. 38


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Not yet recruiting
Enrollment 90
Est. completion date April 5, 2021
Est. primary completion date January 5, 2021
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender All
Age group 30 Years to 80 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

Patients diagnosed as having symptomatic lumbar disc prolapse based on the following:

1. Clinical evidence of disc pulge in the form of disc related radicular pain of >3 months duration, not responding to conservative treatment and interfering with daily activities

2. Radiological demonstration of posterolateral lumbar disc pulge by MRI lumbosacral

3. Age range is between 30-80 years

Exclusion Criteria:

The following patients will be excluded from the study:

1. Patients with spinal deformities

2. Patients with a previous history of spinal trauma

3. Patients with previous spinal surgery

4. Patients with radiological evidence of any inflammatory or neoplastic lesion affecting the spinal cord or vertebral column

5. Patients with severe lumbar disc herniation causing lower limb weakness or sphincteric troubles

6. Patient with pain rather than radicular neuropathic pain as Facet osteoarthritis, Sacroiliitis, Hip osteoarthritis, Discogenic, Pyriformis syndrome.

7. Patients with contraindications to interventions (coagulopathy, sepsis, or allergy to the used drugs)

8. Patients with contraindications for MRI examination (e.g., metallic implants such as pacemakers, surgical aneurysm clips, or known metal fragments embedded in the body).

9. Pregnant

10. History of G6PD deficiency in patients who are candidates to receive ozone therapy.

11. Suspected spondylodiscitis.

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Transforaminal Epidural injection
Transforaminal injection will be performed under fluoroscopy guidance. The patient will be placed in the prone position and draped in the sterile manner. A 22-gauge, 3.5-inch spinal needle will be used. The selected patients will receive transforaminal epidural injection of the drug

Locations

Country Name City State
Egypt Wael Fathy Hassan Bani Suwayf

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Beni-Suef University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Oxidative stress biomarkers (Glutathione (GSH) and superoxide dismutase (SOD)) 2 weeks post intervention
Primary Pain relief Numeric Rating Scale 3 months post intervention
Primary Disability improvement Numeric Rating Scale 3 months post intervention
Secondary Patient satisfaction The Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS) 3 months post intervention
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT04549012 - Determination of Blood Loss After CS Early Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT06114758 - Comparison Effectiveness of Rectal Misoprostol & Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Reducing Hemorrhage in Myomectomy
Completed NCT05076253 - Efficacy of Ivermectin in COVID-19 Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT04573049 - The Effectiveness and Safety of Levosimendan in Patients With Severe Aortic Stenosis and Heart Failure Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Phase 4
Completed NCT04762147 - Comparison of Perioperative Analgesia Between Intravenous Paracetamol and Fentanyl for Rigid Hysteroscopy Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT05510986 - The Effect of Oxycodone Hydrochloride on CRBD After TURBT Under General Anesthesia N/A
Recruiting NCT05968885 - Evaluation the Efficacy Between Botox Injection and Combination Pharmacotherapy in Patients With Detrusor Overactivity Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05092074 - Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir/Voxilaprevir (SOF/VEL/VOX) for Patients With Hepatitis C Virus Infection
Recruiting NCT05595044 - Effect of Vitamin D Therapy in Autism Spectrum Disorder Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT06100510 - PFA 100 Evaluation and Reference Interval HOACNY Phase 4
Completed NCT05060913 - Emla Cream Versus Benzocaine on Analgesia Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT05293119 - Role of Tofacitinib in Vitiligo Patients Early Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05786859 - The Efficacy and Safety of Rifaximin Treatment Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT06290219 - The Effect of Platelet-rich Plasma Nasal Injection in the Treatment of Traumatic Olfactory Dysfunction Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05277480 - Apatinib With Ifosfamide Plus Etoposide for Relapsed or Refractory Osteosarcoma (OAIE) Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05482451 - Nivolumab and All-trans Retinoic Acid for Pancreatic Cancer Early Phase 1
Not yet recruiting NCT04892212 - Sirolimus in Treatment of Proteinuric Flares of Lupus Nephritis Phase 2/Phase 3
Not yet recruiting NCT05918146 - Dextrose Therapy on Physical Therapy in Subdeltoid Bursitis Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06197295 - Efficacy of Combined Pharmacotherapy Versus Solifenacin With Vaginal Estrogen Cream for Women With Detrusor Overactivity Phase 4
Recruiting NCT06114641 - Effectiveness & Safety of Ovine Enoxaparin Sodium to Originator Enoxaparin in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTEACS) Patients: a Multicenter, Non-randomized, Open-label, Non-inferiority Trial Phase 4