View clinical trials related to Edentulous Mouth.
Filter by:This clinical investigation is conducted to prove the long-term clinical performance of a new printable denture base material. The aim of this study is to assess the failure rate, the quality and functionality of the full dentures made with the printable denture base material over an investigational period of 5 years.
The aims of this clinical study are: 1) to compare the accuracy of conventional versus digital impression techniques for implant impressions; 2) to assess the passive fit of the prosthesis constructed from the most accurate impression. Thirty edentulous patients who received 4 - 6 implant and indicated for implant-supported fixed prosthesis will be invited. Full-arch conventional and digital impressions will be made for each patient. Accuracy evaluation will be made and the prosthesis will be constructed from the most accurate impression. Passive fit of the zirconia implant-supported prostheses will be verified at the try-in stage clinically and radiographically.
The importance of the stability of hard and soft tissues has been shown to be of paramount importance for long-term implant success. To reach optimal functional and aesthetic outcomes, implant placement must be planned accordingly to prosthetic needs and design. Prosthetically driven implant placement is based on a diagnostic prosthetic set-up that is followed by precise implant planification and placement using CBCT and intraoral scanning. The aim of this research is to evaluate how the clinical and anatomical factors can influence the 3D position of guided surgery.
CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) can be a game-changer for better access to care by edentulous patients. Digital overdentures offer potential for more satisfied patients due to better fit and can be provided faster/with lower costs. Providing digital overdentures has potential to enhance access to oral healthcare by the elderly, given the expected benefits (better quality, simpler, faster and more affordable than those obtained traditionally). However, evidence from randomized trials is crucial to verify the relevance of those benefits, especially from the patient perspective, and to confirm those benefits. This trial also serves as an opportunity to improve CAD software and materials, since it will identify technical challenges specific to the provision of digital overdentures. This randomized cross-over trial aims to reveal whether implant-retained mandibular overdentures (IMO) produced by CAD and 3D printing are more satisfactory to edentulous seniors than those fabricated using traditional methods. The investigators will recruit 26 edentulous participants (any sex/gender) amongst previous patients at McGill University, based on the following eligibility criteria: complete edentulism, elderly (age ≥60 years, according to the WHO), need for new maxillary and mandibular complete dentures, ability to complete questionnaires, and previous treatment with two implants in the anterior mandible. Each participant will receive two pairs of dentures, as per the McGill Consensus on Implant Overdentures (i.e., a mandibular overdenture opposed by a maxillary complete denture: (i) one by digital rendering of the mouth, virtual prosthetic design and 3D printing; (ii) a control pair, by traditional clinical and laboratory methods. Each pair will be worn for 3 months according to a random sequence (total follow-up: 6 months after the delivery of the first pair of dentures). Both overdentures will be retained by 2 Novaloc abutments and medium retention matrices. Outcomes will include patient satisfaction ratings and oral health-related quality of life. The investigators will evaluate other patient-reported outcomes, as well as clinician-assessed quality and cost. Outcome assessment will occur at baseline, then at three months after participants have worn each pair of dentures. Following the cross-over, participants will keep their preferred denture pair and return after 12 months to evaluate maintenance requirements, including stained and broken dentures.
The objectives of this study are to analyze the oral microbiome modulations occurring during the transition from partial (with some residual teeth) to full edentulous (without remaining teeth) status and implant placement in subjects affected by severe periodontitis; to evaluate if microbiome changes in relation to the used of different implant material/surface; and to assess the variance of the changes to determine the sample size for future longitudinal prospective studies.
Analyzing and comparing the retention, accuracy, EMG and patient satisfaction of maxillary complete denture base fabricated by conventional and rapid prototyping techniques.
This Post-Market Clinical Follow-Up study aims to document the success and survival of the Axiom® BL X3 Implants up to 3 years after loading.
The aim of this study is to gather clinical data related to the use of Plastalgin and Plastalgin Fast, in order to comply with the new medical device regulation. The target population for this study is the same as the intended population specified in the study device's instructions for use: children from 5 years old and adults. Collection, recording, and reporting of data will be accurate and will ensure the privacy, health, and welfare of participating patients during and after the study
This retrospective study investigates the longevity of dentures with SR Phonares II teeth after a wearing period of more than 10 years. The primary objective is to assess the survival rate of dentures with SR Phonares II teeth after more than 10 years. The secondary objectives asses the quality of the dentures concerning aesthetic, functional and biological properties.
In this case-control study a bioactive implant surface was compared with traditional surfaced implants. Primary objectives: Test the implant stability in post-extractive sites, comparing traditional surfaced implants (MultiNeO CS, control group) to bioactive surfaced implants (NINA- MultiNeO NH, treatment group). Primary outcome endpoints were Implant stability, assessed through Implant stability quotient (ISQ) values and Marginal bone loss (MBL)