View clinical trials related to Ductus Arteriosus, Patent.
Filter by:Persistent postnatal ductal patency may have significant adverse hemodynamic effects, frequently necessitating therapeutic intervention in order to facilitate ductal closure. Medical therapy for patency of the ductus arteriosus is successful mediating ductal closure in approximately 70% of treated infants. In a recent study in our population, 17% of the babies showed no ductal response to the first course of treatment and 9.4% of our study infants eventually underwent surgical ligation of the ductus after failure of medical therapeutic closure.We propose to evaluate and compare two alternate therapeutic approaches to ductal closure in babies who do not respond to initial therapy.
AGA-004 - The objective of the study is to determine safety, effectiveness and clinical utility of the AMPLATZER Duct Occluder in patients with patent ductus arteriosus. AGA-007 - The objective of this study is to evaluate the long term safety and effectiveness issues that may not have have been adequately addressed during AGA-004.
The purpose of this study is to determine how the medications which are used to close the patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) in preterm infants affect brain, kidney and gut blood flow when compared to infants that are not treated with these medications. The medications being used for PDA closure are indomethacin and neoprofen.
The aim of the study was to evaluate BNP in preterm infants < 28 weeks on the second day of life, when it is still unknown, if a patent ductus arteriosus is hemodynamic significant or not. We hypothesized that high plasma BNP concentrations on day 2 are associated with the need of PDA intervention in the further course.
A patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is associated with increased morbidity in premature infants. Standard indomethacin treatment is associated with intestinal and renal morbidity. B-type natriuretic peptide is elevated in significant PDAs. This study will determine whether BNP guided therapy could reduce doses of indomethacin.
The purpose of this study is to determine whether closure of the PDA in premature neonates using IV ibuprofen vs continuous IV indomethacin has different side effects, eg. effects on renal function, on blood flow velocity in the superior mesenteric artery, the anterior cerebral artery, and the renal artery.
The purpose of the study is to determine the safety and efficacy of ibuprofen, compared with indomethacin, in the treatment for the closure of the patent ductus arteriosus in premature babies born under 29 weeks gestation
The purpose of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of ibuprofen l-lysine iv in premature infants in the early treatment of Patent Ductus Arteriosus.
Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is one of the most common complications in premature infants. Successful pharmacological closure of PDA with indomethacin was first reported in 1976. Since then indomethacin treatment has become the standard or prophylactic treatment for clinically significant PDA in premature infants. Clinically there is a high incidence of complications associated with indomethacin treatment, including hypoglycemia, necrotizing enterocolitis, GI bleeding, extension of IVH. More recently, ibuprofen has been shown to be effective for the closure of patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants without reducing mesenteric, renal, or cerebral blood flow.Ibuprofen has been shown to close the ductus in animals without reducing cerebral,intestinal or renal blood flow. Furthermore, ibuprofen enhanced cerebral blood-flow autoregulation and had some neuroprotective effect. In recent years, our strategy of PDA treatment for ELBW infants was essentially early targeted indomethacine treatment depending on echocardiographic shunt flow pattern of PDA. (Arch Dis Child 1997;77:F36-F40. Acta Paediatr Tw 1998;39:33-7. and Arch Dis Child 1999;79: F197-F200.) By this regimen, infants will be eligible for the study if their birth weight less than 1000 gm and if they had PDA without other structured cardiac anomaly confirmed by echocardiography shortly after birth (as close as possible to12 hours). After parental informed consent is obtained, infants will be randomly assigned to two groups based on a double-blined design. INDO group will receive echocardiographic assessment at interval of 12-24 hours or clinically necessary, and if the PDA had pulsatile or growing flow pattern, indomethacin is given; if the PDA had flow patterns other than growing or pulsatile pattern, no treatment is given. The subsequent dose of indomethacin is according to the echocardiographic flow patterns at interval of 24 hours from the last dose. When indomethacin was fail to close after the first course, the second course of another 3 doses of indomethacin or ibuprofen will be given. In spite of infants of INDO group or IBUO group, if PDA fail to close after 2 courses of treatment, surgical ligation of PDA would be considered according to the infant’s clinical condition. Our historical data showed that the incidence of complication was about 30%. Permitting 5% chance of type I error and 20% of type II error and an absolute reduction of the incidence by 20%, 30 infants in each group is needed to detect a difference. Primary outcome of the assessment is the closure rate of PDA and the incidence of death or pulmonary hemorrhage. Secondary outcome is IVH or PVL, NEC, oliguria and CLD. We expect that, by using this treatment regimen, a high PDA closure rate can be achieved and the survival of very premature infants may be increased.
Purpose of the study: 1. To evaluate renal function maturation within the first month of life in very premature infants. 2. To determine whether a treatment with Ibuprofen for patent ductus arteriosus would alter renal function maturation at short term and up to 28 days of life.