View clinical trials related to Dry Eye Syndromes.
Filter by:Cross-over comparison of lipid layer thickness and dry eye symptoms with two artificial tear formulations.
Objective: To assess the safety and tolerability of the PRO-165 formulation on the ocular surface of ophthalmologically and clinically healthy subjects. Hypothesis: Ophthalmic gel PRO-165 presents a safety and tolerability profile similar to Artelac® Nightime Gel in ophthalmological and clinically healthy subjects. Phase I clinical study, controlled, of parallel groups, double blind, randomized, exploratory Therapeutic indication of PRO-165: Eye lubricant
The purpose of this study is to determine whether ketorolac and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose are effective in the treatment of Dry Eye.
This is a single-center, randomized, controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of eyelash prostheses versus 5.0% Lifitegrast BID, in 40 patients (20 randomized to each of two arms of the study) evaluated at 3 weeks and 5 weeks, respectively, after initiation of treatment.
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of OC-01 Nasal Spray as compared to placebo in simulating Goblet Cell and Meibomian Gland function in adult subjects with DED.
Clinicians commonly use artificial tears off label for treating contact lens (CL) discomfort and the dry eye associated with CLs because new artificial tear formulations have the potential to outperform the available CL rewetting drops. While off-label, McDonald et al. have previously shown that using a common artificial tear, Systane Ultra, before and after CL use is an effective means for treating daily disposable CL wears who have CL discomfort. Recently, a new formulation of artificial tears, Systane Complete, was released to the market. Systane Complete is a unique formulation that has combined elements from both Systane Ultra (indicated for aqueous deficient dry eye) and Systane Balance (indicated for evaporative dry eye) to create an artificial tear with an indication for aqueous deficient, evaporative, and mixed (both aqueous deficient and evaporative) dry eye. Thus, the goal of this study is to determine in a randomized clinical trial if Systane Complete is able to effectively improve the symptoms of patients who have CL discomfort.
The purpose of this study is to explore the efficacy and safety of CsA ophthalmic gel in the treatment of moderate to severe tear deficiency dry eye with different dosage, frequency and concentration, and to preliminarily determine the optimal dosage, frequency and concentration, so as to provide a theoretical basis for the design of follow-up clinical studies.
The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the efficacy of a 1 month clinical trial of 50% AS for the treatment of severe dry eye syndrom (DES) based on Schirmer's Test, tear break-up time (TBUT), fluorescein staining, and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) scores, as compared to conventional preservative-free artificial tears (PFAT) plus 0.05% COE treatment in patients with severe DES
The objective of this exploratory study is to determine the safety and efficacy of 0.002% Naltrexone Ophthalmic Solution, compared to placebo for the treatment of the signs and symptoms of dry eye in diabetic subjects.
Upper eyelid treatment has not been used with previously described methods of treatment of dry eye disease using intense pulsed light therapy because the upper lids disease was typically not as advanced as lower lid and because direct treatment of the upper lid was not felt to be necessary as each light pulse extended over the entire periorbita even when concentrated on the lower lid.