View clinical trials related to Drug-resistant Tuberculosis.
Filter by:A Phase 1, Drug-Drug Interaction Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and the Induction Potential of TBAJ-876 on CYP3A4 and P-glycoprotein and the Inhibition Potential of TBAJ-876 on P-glycoprotein in Healthy Adult Subjects
A Phase 1, Partially Blind, Placebo Controlled, Randomized, Combined Single Ascending Dose with a Food Effect Cohort (Part 1) and Multiple Ascending Dose Study (Part 2) Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of TBAJ-876 in Healthy Adult Subjects
Tuberculosis (TB) remains a life-threatening disease partly due to increasing incidence of multidrug and extensively drug-resistant TB. Diagnostic based on culture and conventional drug susceptibility testing using media take several weeks leading to prolonged periods of ineffective therapy and ongoing transmission. Development of rapid molecular diagnostic tests for the identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) and drug resistance has become a high priority. The Xpert® MTB/RIF Assay does not provide information on INH-resistance and the LPA is only recommended for use in smear-positive samples, complex to perform and requires manual interpretation. Several novel assays have been recently developed/CE-marked offering high sample throughput and higher sensitivity for detection of MTB, RIF- and INH-resistance in centralized laboratories. However, published data on their performance and operational characteristics is extremely limited. This is a prospective, multicentre, diagnostic accuracy trial in which the performance of centralised TB assay solutions will be assessed at the intended setting of use with culture, phenotypic DST and sequencing as reference standard. Potential trial participants will be identified at participating TB clinics or hospitals (enrolment sites). Sputum samples will be collected and transported to the associated TB reference laboratories (testing sites). In order for the results of this trial to be generalizable, adults with symptoms compatible with pulmonary TB undergoing evaluation will be screened for inclusion at geographically diverse participating centres in high burden TB countries. Additionally, to supplement the drug-resistant cases to timely achieve accurate performance estimates, well-characterized frozen sputum samples from the FIND specimen bank will be used.
Each year, 10.4 million patients are diagnosed with and 1.7 million people die from Tuberculosis (TB). Despite the availability of highly effective and accessible medications in the developing world where TB is endemic, the 6-18 month treatment regimen is often thwarted as patients fail to comply due to a lack of knowledge about the disease, desire for privacy, and/or stigma avoidance. Successful TB treatment is critical for reducing transmission, the selection of drug-resistant strains and treatment costs. Mobile health interventions promise to increase treatment success, especially in regions where directly observed treatment (DOT) is impractical. The most promising interventions attempted thus far employ a combination of SMS reminders and medication monitors. However, there is relatively little high-quality evidence on their impact, and what evidence there is shows mixed success. In Kenya, the burden of TB is among the highest in the world with a prevalence rate of 558 cases per 100,000 people. There is a great need for the development of alternative protocols, which reduce the costs of treatment and burden of adherence, and more effectively motivate patients to adhere to the program. A substantial and growing literature in the social sciences demonstrates the potential of behavioral interventions for generating large increases in contributions to public goods. Keheala, a feature-phone and Internet-based digital platform that uses Unstructured Supplementary Service Data (USSD) technology to register a patient's self-verification of medication adherence alongside support and motivation, based on proven techniques from the behavioral sciences, was shown in a 1,200-patient randomized controlled trial (RCT) to reduce the unsuccessful TB treatment outcomes in Kenya by two-thirds compared to the standard of care protocol. This 15,500 patient RCT will compare Keheala's scalability, cost-effectiveness and social impact to alternative interventions across diverse regions of Kenya.
To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability at 8 weeks (2-months), 52 weeks (12-months), and 104 Weeks (24-months) post the start of the following treatment regimens in participants with: Drug Sensitive TB (DS-TB) patients given BPaMZ for 17 Weeks ( or 4 months) vs. Standard HRZE/HR treatment given for 26 weeks (or 6 months) and Drug Resistant TB (DR-TB) patients given BPaMZ for 26 Weeks (or 6 months)
This study is a U.S.-based, 1 site (with 4 clinical settings), randomized controlled trial (with funding from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's (CDC) Antibiotic Resistance Solutions Initiative) that will be implemented to evaluate traditional directly observed therapy (DOT) and electronic forms of DOT (eDOT) for tuberculosis (TB) treatment. The trial will assess whether eDOT that employs electronic communication methods, such as video via computer or cellphone, is a non-inferior approach to monitor TB treatment adherence, compared to traditional in-person DOT (ipDOT), in which a trained person is in the physical presence of patients as anti-TB drugs are ingested. ipDOT is the single best intervention proven to be successful when it comes to TB patients' adherence to therapy (which reduces risk of acquired drug resistance). However, ipDOT is resource intensive and many times challenging to facilitate in-person. If eDOT is found to be non-inferior to ipDOT, health departments and other clinicians might be able to provide eDOT to certain populations of TB patients in a more flexible and potentially cost-saving manner.
The investigators will determine the bactericidal activity of high-dose isoniazid against M. tuberculosis isolates that are (1) susceptible to isoniazid at 2.0 mcg/ml but resistant at 0.1 and 0.4 mcg/ml or (2) susceptible at 0.4 mcg/ml but resistant at 0.1 mcg/ml when tested in the BD MGIT 960 system. Further, the investigators will investigate the molecular genetic determinants of these differences in susceptibility. To achieve these objectives the investigators will carry out an innovative variation on early bactericidal activity (EBA) study methodology. Patients at risk for drug-resistant TB will be screened for INH resistance using approved molecular assays. In those with INH-resistant TB, the investigators will quickly perform phenotypic DSTs using the direct method in the Bactec Mycobacterium Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system, so results will be available within 7 days. If the DST results show the susceptibility patterns noted above, patients will receive 900 mg/d INH (600 mg if <45kg), and assess its effect with serial quantitative sputum cultures for 6 days. If the concentration of viable bacteria decreases significantly, the investigators will interpret this to mean the drug is having an effect. If not, the drug is ineffective. After 6 days, the patients will resume treatment according to national guidelines. In case the investigators identify drugs that are effective under these conditions, the investigators will sequence known and putative genes associated with the action of these drugs for the mycobacterial isolates from these patients.
This pilot project is an evaluation of the feasibility, acceptability, and cost of offering an economic reward, in the form of a shopping voucher, to the household contacts of index patients (outpatient drug-susceptible and drug-resistant TB patients) who present at the study clinic for TB screening and optional HIV testing, providing a reward to the index patients for participating, and entering index patients whose contacts do present into a lottery to win a prize.The effectiveness of the intervention in screening a high proportion of contacts will be compared to existing published data from studies of active case-finding through home visits and of the status quo passive case finding. If successful, this pilot project will create a demand for screening among high risk patients, who will be rewarded for identifying themselves to the healthcare system, and could prove to be an affordable alternative to resource-intensive home visits. It will also shift responsibility for contact tracing from overburdened clinic staff to those who have the most to gain from early case detection-the patients and their families.