View clinical trials related to Drug Dependence.
Filter by:Background: Sixty million American adults suffer from moderate to severe chronic pain. Of these, 5 to 8 million currently use opioids long-term. With increased opioid prescribing for chronic pain, an epidemic of prescription opioid addiction and overdose has arisen. This necessitates action to stem opioid-related morbidity and mortality. Group Health (GH), a large nonprofit health plan, developed and implemented opioid risk reduction strategies for doctors and patients in some, but not all, of its clinics. The risk reduction initiative achieved large opioid dose reductions, near universal documentation of care plans, and marked increases in patient monitoring. Rigorous evaluation of patient outcomes resulting from the opioid risk reduction initiative, incorporating patient perspectives, is needed to guide health care improvement efforts to reduce opioid risks regionally and nationally. Research goal: The investigators will evaluate a major health plan initiative to reduce risks of long-term opioid use for chronic pain. Starting in 2008, some GH clinics reduced prescribing of high opioid doses. In 2010 the same clinics increased care planning and monitoring of chronic opioid therapy (COT) patients. Our research goal is to evaluate effects of this initiative on health and safety outcomes of COT patients. We will test whether the initiative influenced pain outcomes; patient-reported opioid benefits and problems; and opioid-related adverse events. Design and Outcomes: The investigators will assess effects of GH's opioid risk reduction initiative among COT patients using opioids long-term. The investigators will compare COT patients from clinics that implemented the initiative with COT patients from care settings that did not implement the initiative. The investigators will use survey data to assess patient-reported outcomes including pain severity, depressive symptoms, and patient perceptions of opioid benefits and problems, including validated measures of prescription opioid use disorder. They will interview and compare 800 COT patients using opioids long-term from clinics that implemented the risk reduction initiative and 800 COT patients from care settings that did not. Impact: This research will provide an urgently needed, rigorous evaluation of a major risk reduction initiative among COT patients. Evaluation results will guide efforts of health plans, clinicians and patients nationwide to ensure safe, effective and compassionate chronic pain care.
Substance Use Disorder has been showing a rising trend all over the world including India. The project tested whether a Integrated community wide effort of Prevention and Awareness Groups (PAG) to manage substance use would have a greater effect on treatment attendance and drug abstinence than a de-addiction program alone.
This proposed study is an initiative for HIV prevention and care that integrates intervention efforts at multiple strata: Community Health Workers (CHWs), Injecting Drug Users (IDUs), and their Family Members (FMs). The proposed study will demonstrate the process of development, implementation, and evaluation of an intervention for CHWs, IDUs, and their FMs. One aim is to increase the CHWs' capacities to effectively interact with IDUs and FMs for HIV and drug use prevention and treatment. Using a combination of participatory action research and a randomized controlled trial design, this study has the potential to maximize PEPFAR impact in Vietnam and other PEPFAR-funded countries by identifying a sustainable mix of interventions and their implementation in different settings. The findings may benefit not only Vietnam but also a global audience by investigating enhanced methods for controlling the HIV epidemic.
If shown to be effective, the Recovery Line would provide an inexpensive, transportable, and easy to use treatment to improve substance abuse outcomes for medication assisted treatment. Given the high costs of relapse and continued drug use, improvement of treatment outcomes would provide substantial health, economic, and societal benefits.
The purpose of this study is to compare 6-month treatment outcomes for 15-21 year old opioid-dependent youth receiving extended release naltrexone (XR-NTX) v. Treatment as Usual (TAU).
The aims of STRIDE were changed as of July, 2014. The revised project, called STRIDE2, has a longitudinal, non-randomized, observational study design. The population under study consists of individuals living with HIV who are dependent on opioids.
This study is the first to develop and test in a randomized experimental design the efficacy of an integrated 12-step facilitation intervention tailored for young people. In the first phase of the study, the investigators are developing and revising a preliminary manual for the two sessions individually-delivered Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET) component and subsequent 8 session group-delivered Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) component which will integrate Twelve-step Facilitation (TSF). Forty adolescents each will complete the preliminary integrated TSF protocol. In the second phase of the study, the investigators will compare integrated TSF (iTSF) to standard treatment (MET/CBT) in a randomized experimental design for adolescent substance use disorder with 60 adolescents. As a result, the investigators will examine potential mechanisms that may underlie the efficacy of iTSF in improving alcohol and other drug use outcomes. The investigators will test group differences on potential mechanisms of change (e.g., Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous attendance and involvement) and whether these variables are associated with substance use outcomes.
This study tests the effectiveness of Making Alcoholics Anonymous Easier (MAAEZ), a manual-guided intervention designed to help alcohol and drug dependent clients connect with individuals encountered in AA. An OFF/ON design was used (n=508). MAAEZ effectiveness was determined by comparing abstinence rates of participants recruited during ON (MAAEZ intervention) and OFF (usual care) conditions and by studying the effect of the number of MAAEZ sessions attended. Better outcomes were hypothesized for MAAEZ vs. usual care. At 12 months, more clients in the ON condition (vs. OFF) reported past 30-day abstinence from alcohol, drugs, and both alcohol and drugs. Abstinence increased for each additional MAAEZ session received. MAAEZ appeared especially effective for those with more prior AA exposure, severe psychiatric problems, and atheists/agnostics. Mechanisms of action for MAAEZ (mediators of the MAAEZ effect) include: doing service in AA/NA/CA; having a sponsor; having a social network supportive of abstinence; and comfort being in meetings. MAAEZ represents an evidence-based intervention that is easily implemented in existing treatment programs.
In comparison to the general population, U.S. military and Veterans are at an increased risk for developing both substance use disorders (SUD) and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Current research has shown that there is a high comorbidity of SUD and PTSD, and although there are a number of treatments for SUD and PTSD independently, there are very few effective methods to simultaneously treat both disorders. Because of this substantial gap in the treatment of both SUDs and PTSD, it has become essential to develop a combined treatment that would address and treat both disorders. Individuals, specifically U.S. military and Veterans, with SUD/PTSD have unique needs that require a specialized treatment approach. This designed approach would employ cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to treat the SUD, in conjunction with Prolonged Exposure therapy to treat the PTSD. Prolonged Exposure (PE) is an empirically supported and evidence-based treatment that is currently regarded as the "gold standard" psychosocial treatment for PTSD. In combination with CBT, this treatment would address both disorders in hopes of reducing substance use and PTSD symptomatology.
Specific Aim: To conduct a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of extended release-naltrexone (XR-NTX) among Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) infected prisoners meeting Diagnostic Statistical Manual IV (DSM-IV) criteria for opioid dependence who are transitioning from the structure of a correctional setting to the community. Hypotheses: i. XR-NTX will result in improved HIV clinical outcomes, including lower changes in HIV-1 RNA levels, higher CD4 counts and higher rates of retention in care. ii. XR-NTX will result in improved opioid treatment outcomes, including longer time to opioid relapse, lower addiction severity and lower craving for opioid. iii. XR-NTX will result in reduced drug- and sex-related HIV risk behaviors compared to the control group. iv. XR-NTX will result in decreased rates of reincarceration after 12 months of release to the community.