Clinical Trials Logo

Diverticulum clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Diverticulum.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT00663247 Completed - Clinical trials for Diverticulosis, Colonic

Mechanistic Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) of Mesalazine in Symptomatic Diverticular Disease

Start date: April 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Diverticulosis (bulges in the bowel wall) affects two third of the elderly population in the UK. Diverticular disease and its complications are responsible for 68000 hospital admissions and 2000 deaths per year. It commonly produces recurrent short lived abdominal pain, changes in bowel habit and incontinence. The causes of symptoms are not known and the treatments unsatisfactory. Recent studies have found an association between inflammation, alteration of bowel nerves and symptoms. Mesalazine is an anti-inflammatory drug used in inflammatory bowel conditions, such as ulcerative colitis and crohn's disease. We plan to perform a randomized double blind (neither the patients or the doctors known which treatment the patient is taking) placebo (sham medication) controlled trial of mesalazine in symptomatic diverticular disease patients. We anticipate a reduction in the amount of inflammation, bowel nerve changes and symptoms in patients taking mesalazine compare to those taking the placebo.

NCT ID: NCT00535652 Completed - Rectal Neoplasms Clinical Trials

Concentration of Ertapenem in Colorectal Tissue

Start date: September 2007
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the tissue kinetics of ertapenem in colonic tissue from three hours up to six hours (25% of dosing interval) after administration of ertapenem.

NCT ID: NCT00453830 Completed - Diverticulitis Clinical Trials

Laparoscopic Versus Open Sigmoid Colectomy for Diverticular Disease

Start date: January 2005
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Aim: This is a prospective, randomized comparison of traditional open (OS) and laparoscopic sigmoidectomy (LS) in patients with complicated diverticular disease. The study is designed in order to minimize bias by standardizing the two procedures and blinding patients and nurses during the preoperative and early postoperative period. Hypothesis: A laparoscopic approach for sigmoidectomy has significant advantages over the open technique with respect to postoperative pain, duration of ileus, length of hospital stay, and perioperative morbidity. Methods: Patients with complicated diverticular disease who are candidates for elective sigmoidectomy will be randomized the day before surgery, and anaesthetic technique and postoperative management will be standardized between groups. Surgeons with experience in both laparoscopic-assisted and open colectomy will perform both types of procedures. At the end of the operation, identical, opaque wound dressings will be applied and left in place until postoperative day 4. Both patients and nursing staff will therefore be blinded to the type of surgical technique during the early postoperative period. Endpoints: A) Postoperative pain assessed by the Visual Analog Scale at postoperative days 1, 2, and 3. B) Postoperative intake of systemic opiates (morphine) C) Duration of postoperative ileus, quantified by the interval in hours between the end of the procedure and passage of first stool. D) Duration of hospital stay. E) Surgical complications, such as wound infection, anastomotic leakage, bleeding F) General medical complications, such as cardiopulmonary, pneumonia, and renal failure. Rationale: This study will determine whether a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy is associated with significant clinical advantages over the traditional open approach when patients with complicated diverticular disease are blinded to the operative technique.

NCT ID: NCT00169715 Completed - Kidney Stones Clinical Trials

Database and Registry for Renal Diverticulum

Start date: February 2003
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Historically, percutaneous treatment of stone-bearing caliceal diverticula has resulted in the best success rates when examining factors such as symptom relief and stone-free rates (Jones, et al, 1991). Many groups have reported modifications in their percutaneous approach which have reportedly improved patient outcomes, but these series have very limited populations. Another issue concerning stone-bearing caliceal diverticula centers on the etiology of stones formation within these areas. This topic remains a subject of debate, with conflicting data in the literature.