View clinical trials related to Diverticulitis.
Filter by:This study will include data collected from surgical units performing emergency surgery in Italy during 2024, with a one-year follow-up period for each patient. Data for each center will be prospectively collected through a database filled out by the Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) members who participate to the study. Specific data will include: WSES diverticulitis classification, procedure timing, laparoscopic/converted procedures, rate of performed protection ileostomies or colostomies, rate and timing of Hartmann reversal or stoma closure, procedures with more than two operators, procedures with expert first operator, night or weekend procedures, and patients aged over 80. Postoperative data will focus on complication rates and mortality at one, six, and twelve months.
In Europe, patients with acute left colon diverticulitis (ALCD) are usually admitted to surgical wards even when only medical treatment is required. The study compares ALCD non-operative management (NOM) between surgical and non-surgical environments regarding clinical outcomes, hospitalization length(LOS), and follow-up.
Background and study aims Diverticular disease or diverticulosis is a benign disease of the colon. Anatomically this is formation of pockets of bowel wall which protrude through weaknesses in the muscular wall of the colon. The mechanisms leading to their formation remains unclear and is likely a complex interaction of multiple factors. For the majority of people these pockets are incidental findings but for some they can cause symptoms or a segment of colon containing them can become inflamed which is called acute diverticulitis. The main aim of this study is to see if a faecal samples, which will be tested for hidden blood content with a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT), could be used as an alternative to currently used follow-up investigations for patients who have an episode of acute diverticulitis confirmed on a computerised tomography (CT) scan. These are colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy or a special CT called CT colonoscopy. We will also be doing a test called faecal calprotectin which is a marker of bowel inflammation and an assessment of the microbes that live in the bowel to see if this will provide further insights into the diagnosis and treatment of diverticulitis. Who can participate? All patients 18 or over admitted to a participating hospital with acute diverticulitis confirmed on a CT scan and who planned to have one of the currently used follow-up investigations are eligible. What does the study involve? The study will involve taking three stool (faecal) samples using faecal testing kits posted to participants. One is on their first solid stool after diagnosis (or as early as possible if their first solid stool is before receiving this pack), the others are at 3 weeks after diagnosis and then 6 weeks after diagnosis. What are the possible benefits and risks of participating? There are no risks of participating. FIT testing has been used in cancer screening now for a number of years and we hope to demonstrate that a negative FIT test for patients after acute diverticulitis will be able to exclude a bowel cancer and prevent the majority of future patients having invasive and time consuming tests. There no additional benefit for participants for their current episode, as they will still need to have these tests. Where is the study run from? Royal Surrey County Hospital When is the study starting and how long is it expected to run for? 09/10/2023-30/09/2024 Who is funding the study? The study is being funded by MATTU (Minimal Access Therapy Training Unit), GUTS (GUTS - Fighting Bowel Cancer) and NHIR (National Institute for Health and Care Research). Who is the main contact? James Norman On the study email rsch.colorectalDfitstudy@nhs.net
It is estimated that approximately 15% to 20% of the subjects with sigmoid diverticulosis will develop acute diverticulitis, with diverticular abscess as the most common complication of sigmoid diverticulitis. While cases with free perforations and diffuse peritonitis require emergency surgery, in cases with contained perforation and abscess formation, the approach is initially conservative. Due to its relative rarity, the treatment of diverticular abscess is not based on high-quality scientific evidence. Abscess size of 4-6 cm is generally accepted as reasonable cutoff determining the choice of treatment between antibiotic therapy and antibiotic therapy plus percutaneous drainage of the abscess. A subgroup of patients will fail the conservative approach and require a surgical rescue strategy. However, the real incidence for conservative treatment failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess remain poorly understood, the knowledge of which could improve decision-making processes, treatment strategies, patient counseling, and even modify the planned treatment strategy in patients deemed at highest risk. The early recognition of patients who show clinical signs of ongoing and worsening intra-abdominal sepsis due to perforation is important to ensure the success of this strategy. In the light of these, knowledge of risk predictors for failure is of utmost importance. Owing the contrasting evidence summary, we set up a multicenter retrospective cohort study that merges the cases from twelve high-volume centers for emergency surgery in Italy to assess the short-term outcomes of initial non-surgical treatment strategies for AD with abscess formation (Hinchey Ib and II) in a large number of patients, and identify risk factors associated with adverse outcomes, to help facilitate appropriate patient selection and assess the optimal treatment strategy for this peculiar subgroup of patients. The purpose of this study is to describe the incidence and risk factors for conservative treatment (antibiotics alone or antibiotics plus percutaneous drainage) failure after non-operative management of acute diverticulitis with abscess using a large multicenter patient series. The present study is designed as a multicenter retrospective observational study conducted at twelve secondary and tertiary Italian teaching surgical centers on CT-diagnosed hemodynamically stable patients (≥18 years) with perforated acute diverticulitis with abscess (with or without extraluminal air) initially treated non-surgically. The rate of failure of non-operative treatment for complicated acute diverticulitis patients with abscess formation and the risk factors of failure of the non-surgical treatment will be assessed. Failure of the conservative treatment is defined as lack of clinical improvement in the general conditions of the patient during index hospital admission, requiring urgent surgery to treat intra-abdominal sepsis.
The goal of this observational study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the probiotic Escherichia coli Nissle 1917 (EcN®, Ca.Di.Group S.p.A) in the treatment of symptomatic patients after an episode of both complicated and uncomplicated acute colonic diverticulitis. The main question it aims to answer are: - Is the studied probiotic able to significantly reduce symptoms, assessed by means of a validated and dedicated score? - Is there any difference in microbiota among the study group at baseline and a selected cohort of patients subdivided in subjects with diverticulosis and asymptomatic subjects after an episode of acute uncomplicated diverticulitis or an episode of complicated diverticulitis submitted to surgery with colonic resection without stoma? - Is there any difference in microbiota in the study group at baseline and after 3 and 6 months of treatment with the probiotic? - Is there any correlation between microbiota modification and symptoms during follow-up? - Is there any impact on fecal calprotectin values before and during probiotic therapy? - Is there any modification of evacuation before and during follow-up? - Is probiotic able to prevent recurrent episodes of acute diverticulitis during follow-up? - The safety of the probiotic will be assessed during the follow-up. The study group will be assessed at baseline and during follow-up with a dedicated clinical score and Bristol stool scale. Microbiota and fecal calprotectin values will be also assessed at baseline and during follow-up. Microbiota at baseline will be also evaluated for comparison in the three selected groups with diverticulosis and both asymptomatic and symptomatic after an episode of acute diverticulitis.
Acute colonic diverticulitis is when a part of the colon gets swollen and inflamed. The diagnosis is based on a CT scan, which can show thickening of the colonic walls and infiltration of the diverticula. These changes and the concomitant symptoms can overlap with colorectal cancer (CRC). Therefore, the guidelines suggest that people with diverticulitis should be offered a colonoscopy to ensure, that CRC is not the underlying cause of the changes and symptoms. In Denmark, a lot of people get hospitalized each year due to diverticulitis, and many of them end up having colonoscopies with the purpose of excluding CRC. Currently, there are no methods for guiding colonoscopies following a diverticulitis episode, resulting in numerous unnecessary colonoscopies each year. In the Diverticulitis study, we want to investigate if a simple blood test analyzed for the presence of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), can help us decide who needs a colonoscopy. We will collect blood samples from 220 people with diverticulitis and categorize them into ctDNA positive and negative groups. The ctDNA category will be compared to the colonoscopy results to see if there is a correlation between being ctDNA positive and having a CRC diagnosed at the colonoscopy. This study could change clinical practice since we anticipate that ctDNA-guided triaging of diverticulitis patients is a cost-effective strategy for selecting diverticulitis patients needing colonoscopy, ensuring detection of the underlying CRC, and significantly reducing the number of patients undergoing unnecessary colonoscopy.
Patients presenting in hospital with symptoms of acute diverticulitis. Acute inflammation of the left-sided colon is confirmed with CT scan or ultrasound in experienced centers and diagnosis is defined according to the "Classification of Diverticular Disease (CDD)". CDD Type 2a, 2b and 3b will be included and then randomized in two groups. Group A will get an early left hemicolectomy 7 to 10 days after admission and initial antibiotic therapy and/or drainage of the abscess. Group B is designated for an elective resection 6 to 8 weeks after dismissal at the earliest and initial conservative treatment and/or after drainage of the abscess. Six weeks after the operation patients of Group A will be asked for their present quality of life with a standardized scoring system (Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index = GIQLI; Short-form 36 Score = SF-36 Score; Low anterior resection syndrome = LARS Score). Group B (elective resection) will be asked at their readmission prior to elective surgery is done. This survey package will be repeated again 6 to 8 weeks later in both groups. Primary endpoints will be the two GIQLI at the said examination times. Secondary endpoints will be SF-36 score, LARS-score, GIQLI-Domains, anastomosis insufficiency and other complications, mortality and length of hospital stay. Comparisons between the groups are made at the said examination times but also 6-8 weeks after the operation.
The purpose of this study is to create a decision tool using ultrasound, patient history, and laboratory values to predict a diagnosis of complicated diverticulitis and whether the patient requires further imaging. The accuracy of the decision tool will be evaluated. This study will also assess the ability of ultrasound to diagnose complicated and simple diverticulitis, and the inter-provider reliability of ultrasound interpretation of diverticulitis
Over the last decade there has been a growing interest toward the application of robotic approach for diverticular disease. The evidence available on the literature showed that robotic approach, compared to the laparoscopic surgery, offers significant advantages in terms of conversion rate and shortened hospital stay for the treatment of diverticular disease. The investigators aimed at evaluating whether robotic colectomy may offer some advantages over the laparoscopic approach for surgical treatment of diverticular disease by analyzing a one year multicenter prospective study. Primary objective is to evaluate if robotic approach reduce the rate of conversion to open approach compared to laparoscopic surgery. Secondary objective is to assess difference between the two approaches in terms of rate of intraoperative complication, postoperative morbidities (according with Clavien and Dindo Classification), hospital stay and at one year follow up. Inclusion criteria are: elective colectomy for complicated or non-complicated diverticular disease performed with laparoscopic or robotic approach and age between 18 and 90 years. Exclusion criteria are non-elective colectomy (emergency resection), open procedure, diverticular resection performed during other procedure (i.e. colectomy for cancer). Data will be collected in one year from the start of the study. Due to the lack of available evidence, it is impossible to draw definitive conclusions. With this study, the investigators hope to clarify the role of the robotic approach in the treatment of diverticular disease.
Acute uncomplicated diverticulitis is a quite prevalent situation and consultation in the emergency department. Its management has progresively changed towards a more conservative one and it is currently recommended in several guidelines the option of avoiding antibiotics in certain highly selected cases. Nevertheless, the implantation of such recommendations in current clinical pratice is unknown and, hypothesizing it was still low, the reasons for such reluctancy are also unknown. Both aspects can be considered quite interesting in order to design a specific plan in order to overcome such difficulties. In order to do so, an online survery was designed and colorectal surgeons along Spain, based in the census of the Young Group from the Spanish Association of Colorectal Surgery were invited to participate. Invitations were distributed along usual communication channels of this group, such as email or chat mobile phone applications. All the responses to the survey will be analyzed in order to find out how many hospitals are using current managemente without antibiotics, its characteristics and, opposite, what are the main reasons for those hospitals that are not using it yet.