View clinical trials related to Diastolic Heart Failure.
Filter by:There is an increased risk of diastolic heart failure in post menopausal women. Estrogen plays a positive role in regulating molecular pathways in heart remodeling. Such pathways may work through purinergic signaling and its downstream effects on the heart's mitochondrial metabolism and angiogenic response to stress. Loss of estrogen functionality in post menopausal women may account for the increased risk of diastolic heart failure. The investigators will explore said pathways using cardiac tissue obtained from patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Our local IRB approved clinical studies seeking proof of principle for the hypothesis that SFN can be safely administered to humans at doses sufficient to protect age-associated cardiac dysfunctions. Beneficial effects of SFN-therapy will be assessed by Pre- and post-intervention echocardiography, and exercise endurance at 0 and 24 weeks. Peripheral blood cells from treated and control subjects will be compared for mitochondrial respiratory function, oxidative damage, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and expression of antioxidant & anti-electrophile genes.
This is a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial in which participants with NYHA class II or III and symptomatic Heart Failure with reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) (Ejection Fraction (EF) ≤ 45%) will be assigned to one of two treatment groups: standard of care or breathing therapy.
The AIM HIGHer Clinical Trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of Cardiac Contractility Modulation (CCM) therapy in patients with heart failure with LVEF ≥40% and ≤60%.
In this study, the effects of core stabilization and computerized wobble board exercise training programs on postural balance and functional exercise capacity in patients over 60 years of age with heart failure will be investigated.
Recent exploratory studies suggest that pacemaker patients with diastolic dysfunction (DD) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may benefit from a higher backup heart rate (HR) setting than the factory setting of 60 beats per minute (bpm). In this prospective double-blinded randomized controlled study, pacemaker patients with DD or overt HFpEF and either 1) intrinsic ventricular conduction or 2) conduction system or biventricular pacing will be enrolled and randomized to either a personalized lower HR setting (myPACE group, based on a height-based HR algorithm) or to the standard 60bpm backup setting (control group) for 1 year.
The role of the left ventricular diastolic function (LVDD) in the weaning failure from mechanical ventilation in unclear. Specifically, is unclear whether the outcome of the weaning process could be affected by a pre-existing LVDD (before ICU admission), or by the worsening of a chronic pattern, or by a de-novo LVDD presentation.
Heart failure (HF) with preserved left ventricular function (pEF) is difficult clinical syndrome to treat effectively with few evidence based therapies. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is now an important co-morbidity being observed in 43% of patients with HFpEF. Rhythm control has not been studied in this population. Catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs are rhythm control therapies that have been used for treatment of AF without HF or HF with reduced systolic function but have not been widely applied in HFpEF. No controlled comparative evaluation has been performed in HFpEF. The introduction of wireless pulmonary artery hemodynamic monitoring has permitted optimization of HF therapy in patients with chronic HF with reduced and preserved EF. Reduction in HF hospitalizations has been observed in post hoc analyses of HFpEF patients but has not been systematically applied in AF patients with HFpEF. In this study, we propose to study both rhythm control and optimized HF therapeutic approaches in an AF with HFpEF study population in a pilot study using a sequential two phase randomized controlled clinical trial design.
As we live longer our population experiencing heart failure (HF) continues to grow consuming an increasing percent of healthcare dollars. Systolic heart failure or pump failure is easy to recognize and measure and is expressed as ejection fraction. Diastolic heart failure (DHF) or failure to fill adequately is much more difficult to quantify with no single measure or number being used to express the severity instead groupings are used with normal and Grade I, II or Grade III to classify with Grade III being the direst. Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (HFrEF) and Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) are used to identify the primary clinical presentation of HF but do not adequately describe the combined effect often presenting within the same subject. It is estimated 35 to 50% of those with HFrEF, having Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 50%, and 50 to 70% of those with HFpEF, having ejection fraction ≥ 50%, also have moderate to severe diastolic dysfunction (DD). The purpose of this study is two fold. The first is to determine if the rate of change measured from the left ventricular inflow inspiratory phase Doppler waveform provides insight into a cause of diastolic heart failure by comparing echocardiographic data points obtained prior to and immediately following optimization of a bi-ventricular pacemaker. This HF population requires an ejection fraction of 35 percent or lower to qualify for the device. These echocardiograms have been previously completed and will be reanalyzed. The second purpose is to determine if relationships between different features of a LV volume curve can be used to generate a single number to describe global diastolic function using the same echocardiograms from the pacemaker group. Results will be compared to a small group of healthy normal participants as a control for validation.
In contrast to the treatment of HF with reduced EF, information to guide the pharmacological therapy of patients with HFNEF are lacking and there is no evidence based treatment for patients with HFNEF. Thus, present treatment strategies for HFNEF are largely based on assumptions regarding its pathophysiological mechanisms and on extrapolations from proven strategies used in systolic HF. Till now, no study enlightens the efficacy and safety of beta blockers in HFNEF in a randomised controlled manner although the role of beta blockers in HF with impaired systolic function has been sufficiently time tested leading to their therapeutic approval in that condition. Keeping in view the small reported benefit of beta blockers in HFNEF as mentioned above, there is a need to provide a conclusive proof of their role in this condition as well. Hence, investigators planned to test the efficacy and safety of metoprolol CR in patients with HFNEF in a randomised double blind placebo controlled trial.