Diarrhea Infectious Clinical Trial
— CDADOfficial title:
The Comparison of the Adjuvant Effect of Probiotics Between Delivery Via Colonoscopic Spray and Oral Administration in Patients With Clostridioides Difficile Colitis Receiving Vancomycin Treatment
Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) colitis is a common hospital-acquired disease, which increases hospitalization length and the mortality rate. Moreover, refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis is an emerging disease. The tapering course of oral vancomycin or oral fidaxomicin is current standard treatment for refractory or recurrent C. difficile colitis. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an alternative one. However, the tapering course of oral vancomycin needs a 6- to 12-week duration, fidaxomicin is expensive, and FMT is not available in every hospital; therefore, it is needed to develop a new treatment. Evidence has shown that the disturbance with reduced diversity of intestinal microbiota may lead to refractory C. difficile colitis. Besides fecal microbiota transplantation, probiotics administration can also correct the disturbed intestinal microbiota. However, inconsistent efficacy of probiotic administration was reported, which may be attributed to the interference by the gastric acid. Precise delivery of probiotics into the colon by colonoscopy can avoid the destruction by gastric acid, with which a better treatment efficacy is expected. The best regimen for C. difficile colitis should be the one which succeeds on the first attempt. Therefore, this study is aimed toward validating the efficacy and safety of the colonoscopic probiotics-spray. Patients diagnosed with C. colitis will be enrolled. All patients will accept the standard treatment of oral vancomycin for 14 days. As an adjuvant probiotic administration at the same time, enrolled patients will be randomly assigned to the probiotics-spray (PS) group and the probiotics-oral (PO) group, respectively. The patients in the PS group will receive colonoscopic spray of probiotics once, while the patients in the PO group will receive the same dosage of oral probiotics divided into 5 days. This study will compare the difference in fecal microbiota changes between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray group and the probiotics-oral group. Moreover, this study will evaluate the efficacy and safety between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray and probiotics-oral in patients with C. difficile colitis.
Status | Recruiting |
Enrollment | 60 |
Est. completion date | December 31, 2024 |
Est. primary completion date | December 31, 2024 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 20 Years and older |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - patients aged = 20 years who are diagnosed with C. difficile colitis Exclusion Criteria: - patients are diagnosed with colitis because of other etiologies, such as intestinal Behçet's disease, amoeba or parasitic colitis, Salmonella colitis, lymphoma, E. coli colitis, cytomegalovirus colitis, ischemic colitis, sigmoid-colon cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases (ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease), solitary rectal ulcer syndrome, radiation colitis - patients who have contraindications for colonoscopy, including declining or refusal to cooperate - unstable vital signs - a diagnosis or highly suspicion of colon rupture - a high-risk situation for colon perforation such as acute diverticulitis - toxic megacolon, etc. - acute myocardial infarct |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Taiwan | National Cheng-Kung University Hospital | Tainan | Other (Non U.s.) |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
National Cheng-Kung University Hospital |
Taiwan,
Bagdasarian N, Rao K, Malani PN. Diagnosis and treatment of Clostridium difficile in adults: a systematic review. JAMA. 2015 Jan 27;313(4):398-408. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.17103. — View Citation
Bojanova DP, Bordenstein SR. Fecal Transplants: What Is Being Transferred? PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 12;14(7):e1002503. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002503. eCollection 2016 Jul. — View Citation
Chang JY, Antonopoulos DA, Kalra A, Tonelli A, Khalife WT, Schmidt TM, Young VB. Decreased diversity of the fecal Microbiome in recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. J Infect Dis. 2008 Feb 1;197(3):435-8. doi: 10.1086/525047. — View Citation
Chilton CH, Pickering DS, Freeman J. Microbiologic factors affecting Clostridium difficile recurrence. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2018 May;24(5):476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.017. Epub 2017 Dec 5. — View Citation
Corcoran BM, Stanton C, Fitzgerald GF, Ross RP. Survival of probiotic lactobacilli in acidic environments is enhanced in the presence of metabolizable sugars. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 Jun;71(6):3060-7. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.6.3060-3067.2005. — View Citation
Dodoo CC, Wang J, Basit AW, Stapleton P, Gaisford S. Targeted delivery of probiotics to enhance gastrointestinal stability and intestinal colonisation. Int J Pharm. 2017 Sep 15;530(1-2):224-229. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2017.07.068. Epub 2017 Jul 29. — View Citation
Georgieva R, Yocheva L, Tserovska L, Zhelezova G, Stefanova N, Atanasova A, Danguleva A, Ivanova G, Karapetkov N, Rumyan N, Karaivanova E. Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic susceptibility of Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium spp. intended for use as s — View Citation
Goodhand JR, Alazawi W, Rampton DS. Systematic review: Clostridium difficile and inflammatory bowel disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011 Feb;33(4):428-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2010.04548.x. Epub 2010 Dec 30. — View Citation
Han S, Lu Y, Xie J, Fei Y, Zheng G, Wang Z, Liu J, Lv L, Ling Z, Berglund B, Yao M, Li L. Probiotic Gastrointestinal Transit and Colonization After Oral Administration: A Long Journey. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021 Mar 10;11:609722. doi: 10.3389/fcimb — View Citation
Hemarajata P, Versalovic J. Effects of probiotics on gut microbiota: mechanisms of intestinal immunomodulation and neuromodulation. Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;6(1):39-51. doi: 10.1177/1756283X12459294. — View Citation
Hempel S, Newberry SJ, Maher AR, Wang Z, Miles JN, Shanman R, Johnsen B, Shekelle PG. Probiotics for the prevention and treatment of antibiotic-associated diarrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012 May 9;307(18):1959-69. doi: 10.1001/jama — View Citation
Honda H, Dubberke ER. Clostridium difficile infection: a re-emerging threat. Mo Med. 2009 Jul-Aug;106(4):287-91. — View Citation
Johnstone J, Meade M, Lauzier F, Marshall J, Duan E, Dionne J, Arabi YM, Heels-Ansdell D, Thabane L, Lamarche D, Surette M, Zytaruk N, Mehta S, Dodek P, McIntyre L, English S, Rochwerg B, Karachi T, Henderson W, Wood G, Ovakim D, Herridge M, Granton J, Wi — View Citation
Kelly CP, LaMont JT. Clostridium difficile--more difficult than ever. N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 30;359(18):1932-40. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0707500. No abstract available. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2010 Oct 14;363(16):1585. — View Citation
Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, LaPlante K, Stewart DB, Limketkai BN, Stollman NH. ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections. Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jun 1;116(6):1124-1147. doi: 10.14309/ajg — View Citation
Ledoux D, Labombardi VJ, Karter D. Lactobacillus acidophilus bacteraemia after use of a probiotic in a patient with AIDS and Hodgkin's disease. Int J STD AIDS. 2006 Apr;17(4):280-2. doi: 10.1258/095646206776253507. — View Citation
Ma C, Wasti S, Huang S, Zhang Z, Mishra R, Jiang S, You Z, Wu Y, Chang H, Wang Y, Huo D, Li C, Sun Z, Sun Z, Zhang J. The gut microbiome stability is altered by probiotic ingestion and improved by the continuous supplementation of galactooligosaccharide. — View Citation
McDonald LC, Gerding DN, Johnson S, Bakken JS, Carroll KC, Coffin SE, Dubberke ER, Garey KW, Gould CV, Kelly C, Loo V, Shaklee Sammons J, Sandora TJ, Wilcox MH. Clinical Practice Guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in Adults and Children: 2017 — View Citation
Mullish BH, Quraishi MN, Segal JP, McCune VL, Baxter M, Marsden GL, Moore DJ, Colville A, Bhala N, Iqbal TH, Settle C, Kontkowski G, Hart AL, Hawkey PM, Goldenberg SD, Williams HRT. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or ref — View Citation
Phanchana M, Harnvoravongchai P, Wongkuna S, Phetruen T, Phothichaisri W, Panturat S, Pipatthana M, Charoensutthivarakul S, Chankhamhaengdecha S, Janvilisri T. Frontiers in antibiotic alternatives for Clostridioides difficile infection. World J Gastroente — View Citation
Pillai A, Nelson R. Probiotics for treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated colitis in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD004611. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004611.pub2. — View Citation
Staley C, Halaweish H, Graiziger C, Hamilton MJ, Kabage AJ, Galdys AL, Vaughn BP, Vantanasiri K, Suryanarayanan R, Sadowsky MJ, Khoruts A. Lower endoscopic delivery of freeze-dried intestinal microbiota results in more rapid and efficient engraftment than — View Citation
Surawicz CM, Alexander J. Treatment of refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011 Jun;8(6):330-9. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2011.59. Epub 2011 Apr 19. — View Citation
van Nood E, Vrieze A, Nieuwdorp M, Fuentes S, Zoetendal EG, de Vos WM, Visser CE, Kuijper EJ, Bartelsman JF, Tijssen JG, Speelman P, Dijkgraaf MG, Keller JJ. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 31;3 — View Citation
Wu KS, Syue LS, Cheng A, Yen TY, Chen HM, Chiu YH, Hsu YL, Chiu CH, Su TY, Tsai WL, Chen WY, Huang CH, Hung HM, Huang LJ, Kuo HJ, Lin PC, Yang CH, Hong PL, Lee SS, Chen YS, Liu YC, Huang LM; Infectious Diseases Society of Taiwan; Medical Foundation in Mem — View Citation
* Note: There are 25 references in all — Click here to view all references
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | The percentage of difference in fecal microbiota change, including probiotics, between the colonoscopic probiotics-spray and probiotics-oral and before and after probiotics use either by colonoscopic probiotics-spray or probiotics-oral | All patients will be monitored for 30 days after diagnosis of C. difficile colitis. The primary endpoint is the comparison of the perseverance of fecal microbiota and metabolites. We will compare the microbiota by sequencing 16S rRNA, measured as percentage abundance per microbial species and differences in percentage abundance between the PS group and PO group in Day 0 and Day 5. We will also compare the relative abundance of C. difficile and target probiotics between the two study groups, such as Lactobacillus acidophilus, Bifidobacterium bifidum, Streptococcus thermophilus, or others. | 5 days | |
Secondary | The rate of resolution of C. difficile colitis | the resolution time of diarrhea and bloody stool | 30 days | |
Secondary | Hospitalization length | the total hospitalization length | 30 days | |
Secondary | The rate of recurrence of C. difficile colitis | the recurrence of C. difficile colitis | 30 days | |
Secondary | The rate of mortality events | all-cause mortality | 30 days | |
Secondary | The rate of adverse events | adverse events from probiotics, including probiotics bacteremia and sepsis | 30 days |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04312906 -
A Baseline Study in Support of Clinical Evaluation of an Oral Shigella Vaccine Development in Africa
|
||
Completed |
NCT04423159 -
Immunological Characteristics of a Population at Risk of Cholera After Oral Cholera Vaccine (CHOVAXIM)
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04602676 -
The Acceptability and Impact of Diarrheal Etiology Prediction (DEP) Algorithm
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06237452 -
VE303 for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection
|
Phase 3 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05722119 -
GastroIntestinal Panel in Kidney Transplant Patients
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05166850 -
Preventative Intervention for Cholera for 7 Days
|
N/A |