View clinical trials related to Diabetic Retinopathy.
Filter by:The purpose is to assess accuracy of digital retinal image interpretation by technicians and direct ophthalmoscopy by nurses for the determination of diabetic retinopathy severity and the presence of diabetic macular edema for the identification of referrals to ophthalmologists. The results of both screening methods were compared with comprehensive eye examination by ophthalmologists.
Patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy or clinically significant diabetic macular edema requiring surgical intervention will receive a pre-operative injection of Macugen. An initial, pre-injection vitreous tap will be done in order to provide baseline VRGF 165 and cytokine levels. At the onset of the vitrectomy, a second vitreous sample will be taken to obtain intra-operative levels of Macugen, VEGF 165 and cytokines.
The purpose of the study is to find out if treatment with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone or an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab can prevent loss of vision caused by panretinal photocoagulation treatment. At the present time, it is not known whether intravitreal steroid or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections are beneficial in preventing vision loss after panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) treatment. It is possible that one or both of the types of injections will prevent vision loss after PRP treatment. However, it is not known whether the benefits of the injections will outweigh the risks. It is possible that because of side effects, the injections may not be as good as laser alone in treating the diabetic retinopathy.
The purpose of the study is to find out which is a better treatment for diabetic macular edema (DME): laser alone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of triamcinolone, laser combined with an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, or intravitreal injection of ranibizumab alone. At the present time, it is not known whether intravitreal steroid or anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections, with or without laser treatment, are better than just laser by itself. It is possible that one or both of the types of injections, with or without laser treatment, will improve vision more often than will laser without injections. However, even if better vision outcomes are seen with injections, side effects may be more of a problem with the injections than with laser. Therefore, this study is conducted to find out whether the benefits of the injections will outweigh the risks.
The purpose of the study is to evaluate intravitreal injection of triamcinolone acetonide after laser panretinal photocoagulation in the treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy.
The study objective is to determine the course of changes in OCT measured macular thickness and visual acuity following a single session of focal photocoagulation for center-involved DME. The response will be evaluated separately in eyes with and without prior focal photocoagulation for DME. The purpose is to determine the proportion of eyes that continue to improve at least 5 letters in visual acuity or at least 10% in central retinal thickness after a session of focal photocoagulation. In addition, the study will explore whether any baseline factors can be identified that are predictive of the response. All subjects will have follow-up visits 8 weeks and 16 weeks post treatment. At the 16-week visit, study eyes are evaluated for change in retinal thickness and visual acuity from baseline. - Treatment is to be deferred and follow up continued if visual acuity letter score has improved by >5 or OCT central subfield thickness has decreased by >10% compared with baseline. - If visual acuity letter score has not improved by at least 5 and OCT central subfield thickness has not decreased by at least 10%, then the eye is classified as 'not improved' and the investigator may provide additional treatment. Follow up ends for eyes that receive additional treatment at this visit. However, if the investigator and participant elect to defer additional treatment (even if deferral criteria are not met), then follow up will continue until the study eye receives additional treatment for DME. - Eyes continuing in follow up have visits every 8 weeks (+1week) as long as there has been continued improvement in visual acuity (letter score improved >5 ) or retinal thickness (central subfield thickness decreased by >10%) compared with the visit 16 weeks earlier. The longest follow-up time will be 48 weeks. By providing information on the length of time during which clinically meaningful improvement occurs following focal photocoagulation, clinicians will be better able to determine when further photocoagulation or other treatments should be considered for persistent DME. Depending on the results of this study, a future randomized clinical trial will be considered comparing the more aggressive retreatment photocoagulation regimen currently serving as the standard DRCR Network approach to focal photocoagulation for macular edema with the less aggressive regimen evaluated in this protocol.
Recently, intravitreal bevacizumab (Avastin) injection has gained popularity as a potential treatment of intraocular neovascularization (CNV) associated with age related macular degeneration and diabetic retinopathy. The efficacy of the drug is thought to be related with its pharmacologic blockade of VEGF. The purpose of this study is to determine the effect of the intravitreal bevacizumab on the fibrovascular membrane associated with proliferative diabetic retinopathy by objective histologic evaluation. The patients scheduled for vitrectomy for tractional fibrovascular membrane due to proliferative diabetic retinopathy will be randomized into two treatment groups. The one will receive conventional vitrectomy and the other group will receive intravitreal bevacizumab injection one week before the scheduled vitrectomy. The fibrovascular membrane will be excised during surgery and fixated for histologic examinations. The expression of VEGF and PEDF, a potent inhibitor of angiogenesis, will be evaluated in the fibrovascular membrane by immunohistochemistry. The results will be compared between two treatment groups.
The formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis), blood vessel leakage, and inflammation contribute to the progression of the eye disease, age-related macular degeneration (AMD), which is the leading cause of irreversible, severe loss of vision in people 55 years of age and older in the developed world. TG100801 is a new drug that inhibits ocular angiogenesis, vascular leak, and inflammation in laboratory studies, and may have great utility in the treatment of diseases such as AMD. The purpose of this study is to assess the safety, ocular tolerability, and blood pharmacokinetics of TG100801 at escalating doses in healthy volunteers.
The aim of the present study is to compare the functional and clinical differences and advantages between a standard operating system and a newly developed even smaller system for pars plana vitrectomy. The present study may work out the possible advantages and disadvantages between the routinely used 20-gauge vitrectomy system and the newly developed 23-gauge device.
The retinal vasculature changes dramatically in patients with diabetic retinopathy especially between non-proliferative and proliferative disease. The retinal vasculature can be imaged and quantified using special dyes. This study will test whether the pattern of the retinal vasculature changes in patients with different levels of diabetic retinopathy can be quantified using computerized image analysis. In addition, the study will evaluate whether new drugs to treat diabetic retinopathy will be able to reverse these vascular changes.