Diabetic Foot Ulcer Clinical Trial
— DADOfficial title:
Direct Antibiotic Delivery of Cefazolin Into Soft Tissue Infections Using Subcutaneous Injection and Ultrasonic Dispersion
NCT number | NCT01238276 |
Other study ID # | IND 75,736 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | No longer available |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated |
Verified date | October 2018 |
Source | Sonescence, Inc. |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Expanded Access |
This study focuses on a new drug delivery system (Direct Antibiotic Delivery) to treat soft
tissue infections. In this study, cefazolin is delivered directly to the target tissues using
subcutaneous injection of antibiotic solution and then dispersed using high-frequency
external ultrasound. Using this system, a much higher concentration of antibiotic can be
achieved than through traditional treatment methods.
Unlike traditional delivery methods, Direct Antibiotic Delivery does not rely on blood supply
and is beneficial for subjects with Diabetes or subjects who have received radiation therapy
and blood supply is limited.
Status | No longer available |
Enrollment | 0 |
Est. completion date | |
Est. primary completion date | |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects with pathologically confirmed presence of serious or immediately life-threatening soft tissue infection, cellulitis or open wound caused by bacteria for which cefazolin at this concentration is likely to have activity to inhibit the bacteria, for example, Staphylococcus species or Streptococcus species, Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis. - Wounds must demonstrate the presence of skin and skin structure infection, which may be demonstrated by one or more of the following: Culture results as aforementioned, swelling of the tissues, discoloration, open wounds, and/or drainage, which may or may not be associated with pain and/or tenderness. - Confirmed presence of soft tissue cellulitis caused by bacteria for which cefazolin is likely to have activity to inhibit the bacteria will be evidenced by microbiologic cultures taken no greater than ten (10) days prior to treatment. - Subject must have previously been treated by a qualified licensed physician using traditional surgical and/or medical treatments, which may include courses of IV antibiotics, but where Subject was unable to resolve their infection through traditional surgical and/or medical treatments for soft tissue cellulitis caused by bacteria for which cefazolin is likely to have activity to inhibit the bacteria at a maximum concentration of 1 gram per 100 ml saline, as demonstrated by the presence of induration, redness, open wounds, and/or soft tissue swelling. - Subject must be referred by his or her treating physician to the Wound Care Center of the investigational hospital. - The Wound Care Center of the investigational hospital has confirmed that standard therapies have failed to cure the subject's infection and the infection is still present. - Subjects are not on concomitant antibacterial drugs since these drugs have failed to treat the subject's infection. - Subject may be male or female and must be at least 18 years of age. - Subject must sign informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects who have not received treatment by traditional surgical and/or medical therapies. - Subjects who are allergic to cefazolin. - Subjects who have a serious allergy to penicillin. - Subjects with infections that involve body cavities. - Subjects designated to be vulnerable, i.e., pregnant women, subjects under the age of 18, and subjects who need to have consent provided by a Legally Authorized Representative (LAR). - Subjects who are unable or unwilling to comply with the protocol. - Subjects who have a history of clinically significant or uncontrolled cardiac disease, including congestive heart failure, angina, myocardial infarction, arrhythmia, including New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification of 3. - Subjects who have any other life-threatening illness or organ system dysfunction, which, in the opinion of the investigator, would either compromise subject safety or interfere with the evaluation of the safety of the test drug. - Subjects who cannot understand English. - Subjects who have received a treatment under this study are not eligible for re-admittance for thirty (30) days from the date of their last treatment. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
United States | Sonoma West Medical Center | Sebastopol | California |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Sonescence, Inc. |
United States,
Champoux N, Du Souich P, Ravaoarinoro M, Phaneuf D, Latour J, Cusson JR. Single-dose pharmacokinetics of ampicillin and tobramycin administered by hypodermoclysis in young and older healthy volunteers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1996 Sep;42(3):325-31. — View Citation
Frisoli Junior A, de Paula AP, Feldman D, Nasri F. Subcutaneous hydration by hypodermoclysis. A practical and low cost treatment for elderly patients. Drugs Aging. 2000 Apr;16(4):313-9. Review. — View Citation
Lavery LA, Armstrong DG, Murdoch DP, Peters EJ, Lipsky BA. Validation of the Infectious Diseases Society of America's diabetic foot infection classification system. Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Feb 15;44(4):562-5. Epub 2007 Jan 17. — View Citation
Weninger KR, Camara CG, Putterman SJ. Observation of bubble dynamics within luminescent cavitation clouds: Sonoluminescence at the nano-scale. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2001 Jan;63(1 Pt 2):016310. Epub 2000 Dec 27. — View Citation
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT04497805 -
Clinical Study of ALLO-ASC-SHEET in Subjects With Diabetic Wagner Grade II Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Withdrawn |
NCT03675269 -
Adjunctive Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) for Lower Extermity Diabetic Ulcer:
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04624516 -
Effect of Self-foot Exercise on the Incidence of Plantar Foot Diabetic Ulcer Recurrence
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06439667 -
VIRTUALLY SUPERVISED TELE-EXERCISE PLATFORM FOR ACCELERATING PLANTAR WOUND HEALING
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT05608187 -
Evaluating Safety and Biological Effect on Wound Healing of ILP100-Topical in Subjects With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06437028 -
Evaluating the Efficacy of Perinatal Membrane Allografts for the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers.
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06278935 -
Lifestyle Tailored Offloading for Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Withdrawn |
NCT05024656 -
AmnioExcel® Plus vs SOC in the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02202668 -
Transcutaneous Raman Spectroscope (TRS) Analyses of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01951768 -
Efficacy and Safety of Garamycin® Sponge in Diabetic Patients With a Moderate or Severe Foot Ulcer Infection
|
Phase 4 | |
Terminated |
NCT01966380 -
Proof of Concept (Design Validation) in Patient With Hard to Heal Wounds Such as Pressure Ulcer, Diabetic Foot Ulcer and Leg Ulcer, Leia
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT01657474 -
Comparative Study of Two Application Regimens of Amniotic Membrane Wound Graft In the Management of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT00389636 -
TheraGauzeā¢ Alone and Regranex®Gel 0.01% Plus TheraGauzeā¢ in the Treatment of Wagner Stage I Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01181440 -
Dermagraft(R) for the Treatment of Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers
|
Phase 3 | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT05888259 -
Plantar Pressure Distribution in Diabetic Foot Ulcer
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04054804 -
Digital Foot Check by Using the D-Foot, a New Software
|
||
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05877378 -
Efficacy of PICO Single-use System in Chronic Ulcers
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06037369 -
The Short Message-based Customized Standardized
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03312595 -
Clinical Outcomes After Treatment With RestrataTM Wound Matrix in Diabetic Foot Ulcers (DFU)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04564443 -
A Unique Micro Water Jet Technology Device Versus Standard Debridement in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot
|
N/A |