Dentin Hypersensitivity Clinical Trial
Official title:
Immediate And Sustained Treatment Response Of Commercially Available BioMin F, Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief And Sensodyne Rapid Action Dentifrices In Dentin Hypersensitivity - "A Randomized Clinical Trial"
Verified date | April 2021 |
Source | Dow University of Health Sciences |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This will be multi-centered, triple blinded, randomized, four parallel treatments assigned study to compare clinical efficacy of commercially available dentifrices with placebo for immediate and sustained relief from Dentin Hypersensitivity after short term use. Condition or disease: Dentin hypersensitivity Intervention/Treatment: Product 1; Fluoro-Calcium-Phospho-silicate based BioMin F Product 2; Pro-Argin formula based Colgate Sensitive Pro-Relief Product 3; Strontium Acetate based Sensodyne Rapid Action Product 4; Sodium Fluoride based Colgate Total
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 140 |
Est. completion date | January 16, 2021 |
Est. primary completion date | January 16, 2021 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years to 50 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Subjects with at least two teeth sensitive to cold, touch and air blow stimulus - Sensitive teeth anterior to molars either due to erosions or abrasions with or without associated gingival recession - Teeth with Linear Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score of = 4 and code 2 of Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale on screening. Exclusion Criteria: - Subjects with worst pain response at 100mm on VAS.(Visual Analog Scale) - Teeth with orthodontic or prosthetic appliances, Caries, restorations or cracks - Localized or generalized gingivitis or pulpitis with heavy calculus - Periodontal surgery in the preceding three months - Patients using any desensitizing tooth paste or mouth wash up to six weeks before study and taking drugs like anti-inflammatory, sedatives, tranquilizers, analgesics in routine. - Pregnant or breastfeeding females. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Pakistan | Dr Syed Jaffar Abbas Zaidi | Karachi | Sindh |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Dow University of Health Sciences |
Pakistan,
Ashwini S, Swatika K, Kamala DN. Comparative Evaluation of Desensitizing Efficacy of Dentifrice Containing 5% Fluoro Calcium Phosphosilicate versus 5% Calcium Sodium Phosphosilicate: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Jul-Sep;9(3):330-336. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_735_17. — View Citation
Hall C, Mason S, Cooke J. Exploratory randomised controlled clinical study to evaluate the comparative efficacy of two occluding toothpastes - a 5% calcium sodium phosphosilicate toothpaste and an 8% arginine/calcium carbonate toothpaste - for the longer-term relief of dentine hypersensitivity. J Dent. 2017 May;60:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.02.009. Epub 2017 Feb 20. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Percent Change in Mean Score of Pain Response From Baseline on Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity Scale Using Air Blast Stimulus | SCHIFF cold air sensitivity scale was used to measure the intensity of pain due to dentin hypersensitivity using air blast stimulus. Patients' response of pain was assessed by the doctor according to following score range from; "0"(no response of pain), "1" (pain response but no request of discontinuity of stimulus), "2"(pain response with request of discontinuity of stimulus), "3"(Immediate pain response for discontinuity of stimulus). Percent change in mean scores = ( one minute score-Baseline score) / Baseline score | (Base line to 1 minute) (Base line to 5 minutes)(Base line to day 3)(Base line to week 4) | |
Secondary | Percent Change in Mean Scores of Pain Response From Baseline on Visual Analog Scale Using Mechanical Stimulus | Visual Analogue Scale was used to measure the intensity of pain due to dentin hypersensitivity using mechanical stimulus. Patient's response of pain was assessed on vertical line of 0 to 10cm by asking him to move finger on the line and stop it where he felt pain. Score range from; 0 (no pain at 0cm), 1(mild pain at 1cm), 2(mild pain at 2cm), 3(mild pain at 3cm), 4(moderate pain at 4cm), 5(moderate pain at 5cm), 6(moderate pain at 6cm), 7(severe pain at 7cm), 8(severe pain at 8cm), 9(severe pain at 9cm),10(worst imaginable pain at 10cm). Percent change in mean scores = (one minute score-Baseline score) / Baseline score | (Base line to 1 minute) (Base line to 5 minutes)(Base line to day 3)(Base line to week 4) | |
Secondary | Percent Change in Mean Scores of Pain Response From Baseline on Visual Analog Scale Using Water Jet Stimulus | Visual Analogue Scale was used to measure the intensity of pain due to dentin hypersensitivity using Water Jet Stimulus. Patient's response of pain was assessed on vertical line of 0 to 10cm by asking him to move finger on the line and stop it where he felt pain. Score range from; 0 (no pain at 0cm), 1(mild pain at 1cm), 2(mild pain at 2cm), 3(mild pain at 3cm), 4(moderate pain at 4cm), 5(moderate pain at 5cm), 6(moderate pain at 6cm), 7(severe pain at 7cm), 8(severe pain at 8cm), 9(severe pain at 9cm),10(worst imaginable pain at 10cm). Percent change in mean scores = (one minute score-Baseline score) / Baseline score | (Base line to 1 minute) (Base line to 5 minutes)(Base line to day 3)(Base line to week 4) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT00763269 -
The Efficacy of a Toothpaste to Reduce Sensitivity
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06154941 -
Clinical Evaluation of Giomer Based Varnish Versus CPP-ACP Varnish in the Management of Dentin Hypersensitivity: a Randomized Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05501691 -
Effect of Diode Laser on Sensitive NCCLs Prior to Composite Restoration
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04484844 -
Clinical Evaluation of Efficacy of Shield Force Plus Varnish VS Sodium Fluoride on Dentin Hypersensitivity
|
Phase 2/Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT02936830 -
Effectiveness of Nanohydroxyapetite Paste on Reducing Dentin Hypersensitivity
|
Phase 4 | |
Completed |
NCT02931734 -
Assessment of Different Protocols for Cervical Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04512625 -
Desensitizers in Reducing Post Tooth Preparation Sensitivity for a Fixed Dental Prosthesis
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05623761 -
Toothpastes With Thermal Water for Oral Health
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT04731766 -
Effect of Using Different Varnishes on Dentin Hypersensitivity; Na Fluoride and Nano-silver Fluoride
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05927831 -
Grape Seed Extract VS Low Level Laser Therapy for Dentin Hypersensitivity
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03943095 -
Study to Characterize the Efficacy of a Dual Active Dentifrice for the Relief of Dentin Hypersensitivity
|
Phase 2 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT06276777 -
The Effect of Using Desensitizers Containing S-PRG In Treatment Of Dentin Hypersensitivity Over 6 Months: A Randomized Clinical Trial
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04225247 -
Efficacy of Seventh Generation Bonding Agents as Short-Term Desensitizers Among Patients With Hypersensitivity
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT04887181 -
The Effects of Different Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment Methods on Quality of Life
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03061383 -
Reduction of Dentine Hypersensitivity Using 8% Arginine Based Toothpaste and 8% Strontium Acetate Based Toothpaste (DH)
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03076944 -
Evaluation of Desensitization Protocols in Reduction of Dentin Hypersensitivity
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT06264453 -
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KH001 in Patients With Dentin Hypersensitivity
|
Phase 2 | |
Recruiting |
NCT03083496 -
Clinical Evaluation of Different Potassium Oxalate Concentrations in Dentin Hypersensitivity Treatment
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03965039 -
A Clinical Study to Assess the Effects of Various Dentifrice Technologies on Dentinal Hypersensitivity
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06113874 -
The Influence of Desensitizing Agent on Postoperative Sensitivity in Posterior Composite Restoration
|
N/A |