Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03834636
Other study ID # PPGO 029
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase Phase 3
First received
Last updated
Start date January 10, 2012
Est. completion date January 10, 2022

Study information

Verified date February 2019
Source Federal University of Pelotas
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The objective of this double-blind randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the influence of caries risk, occlusal stress and missing teeth on anterior restorations over a 10 years follow up period. 300 teeth will be randomized according to two adhesive systems: Single Bond 2 and Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE); and two composite resins: nanoparticulated (Filtek ™ Z-350- 3M ESPE) and nanohybrid (IPS Empress Direct - Ivoclar Vivadent). The randomization will be stratified according to the risk of caries and cavity type. The primary outcomes will be longevity, annual failure rate (AFR) and the success of the restorations, and the secondary outcome will be causes for restorations' failure.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 110
Est. completion date January 10, 2022
Est. primary completion date January 10, 2022
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 9 Years to 70 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients with restorative needs in anterior teeth;

- Patients able to understand and sign the informed consent form;

- Patients willing to return to follow up.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Patients who had a need for Class III and Class IV restorations that did not involve at least 1/3 of the tooth;

- Patients under orthodontic treatment;

- Patients with a compromised general health condition, presenting a greater risk than ASA II, according to the ASA-PS (American Society of Anesthesiologists - Physical Status);

- Patients who had no occlusal contact with an opposing tooth and/or crown;

- Patient with absence of bilateral balanced occlusion;

- Patient with deep caries lesions in close contact with the dental pulp and in need of expectant treatment or direct pulp capping;

- Patients with post-retained need in anterior teeth.

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Restorations with nanoparticulated composites and self etch adhesives
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a self-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond Universal, 3M ESPE), selective enamel etching, and use of a nanoparticulated composite (Z350, 3M ESPE)
Restorations with nanoparticulated composites and total-etch adhesives
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a total-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond 2, 3M ESPE), and use of a nanoparticulated composite (Z350, 3M ESPE)
Restorations with nanohybrid composites and self etch adhesives
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a self-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond Universal, 3M ESPE), selective enamel etching, and use of a nanohybrid composite (IPS Empress Direct, Ivoclar Vivadent).
Restorations with nanohybrid composites and total-etch adhesives
The restorations will be placed according to the protocol developed for the care, following the guidelines of the manufacturers, with a total-etching dental adhesive (SingleBond 2, 3M ESPE), and use of a nanohybrid composite (IPS Empress Direct, Ivoclar Vivadent).

Locations

Country Name City State
Brazil Federal Univeristy of Pelotas Pelotas RS

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Federal University of Pelotas

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Brazil, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Survival of the restorations Survival of the restoration is defined as any case where the restoration remains functional in the mouth at the time of evaluation, regardless of need of small interventions, such as repair or refurbishment. The restorations were evaluated shortly after baseline and in prospective periods through a direct clinical inspection, with an explorer probe and a clinical mirror, according to the criteria for clinical evaluation of restorations proposed by the FDI (International Dental Federation) (Hickel et al., 2010), the risks of caries and occlusal stress were also evaluated again.
Two trained and calibrated evaluators, unrelated to making the restorations, blinded to the type of material used, independently performed the clinical evaluations.
Changes in the dental restorations status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years.
Primary Success of the restorations Success of the restoration is defined as any case where the restoration remains functional in the mouth at the time of evaluation, without any need of new interventions, and attending the patients demands. The restorations were evaluated shortly after baseline and in prospective periods through a direct clinical inspection, with an explorer probe and a clinical mirror, according to the criteria for clinical evaluation of restorations proposed by the FDI (International Dental Federation) (Hickel et al., 2010), the risks of caries and occlusal stress were also evaluated again. Changes in the dental restorations status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years.
Secondary Patient satisfaction with the treatment Patient satisfaction will be recorded with FDI criteria Changes in the patient's satisfaction status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years.
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Not yet recruiting NCT03608306 - Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations N/A
Completed NCT06273410 - Clinical Performance of An Alkasite Based Restorative Material With And Without Adhesive N/A
Completed NCT04326816 - Restorative Treatment of Severe Tooth Wear; Direct vs Indirect N/A
Completed NCT02119195 - Increasing Composite Restorations Sealants N/A
Completed NCT05556551 - Comparing Between Two Different Restoration N/A
Completed NCT03175627 - Clinical Performance of Posterior Composite Tooth Fillings in Adults N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03771196 - Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT03859284 - Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT05380973 - Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04701320 - Clinical Evaluation of Nano Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer in Treatment of Root Caries in Geriatric Patients Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT02957734 - Full Occlusal Rehabilitation for Patients With Severe Tooth Wear Using Indirect Composite Restorations Phase 4
Not yet recruiting NCT05499494 - Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations N/A
Completed NCT05180903 - Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria. N/A