Dental Restoration Failure Clinical Trial
Official title:
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial
Clinical performance of bioactive restorative material versus Resin Modifeid Glass Ionoer (RMGI) in class V o will be evaluated over 12 months using United State Public Health Criteria (USHPS) clinical criteria for the evaluation of direct and indirect restorations
Recent developments in the province of material sciences, some novel materials require direct association with oral environment for renewal, recharging or enhancing of the constituents of the restoration to improve marginal integrity to decrease bacterial microleakage. Physical and chemical properties of dental restorations have been progressed such that individual components may exert a bioactive role in the prevention, remineralization, and restoration of active carious lesions.Fluoride containing restorative materials recently gained great attention. Fluoride decreases caries activity by being a bacteriostatic and by decreasing the solubility of enamel and dentin through its integration into tooth tissue to form fluoroapatite. Moreover, it aids to remineralize defected tooth structure after demineralization. conventional GICs and RMGICs are have high fluoride release and could be specified clinically to repair decayed non-biting areas in high caries risk patients.To enhance the mechanical properties of GIs, their constituents have been modified Comparatively, resin-modified GIs (RMGIs) with a longer working time, faster setting, higher early strength, and improved appearance and translucency. Unfortunately, the RMGI's mechanical properties of are different to resin composites. progressive development of material sciences has resulted in the introduction of bioactive restorative materials. These materials can activate a tissue repair mechanism for or synthesis and elicit a response from teeth and surrounding environment. ;
| Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT03608306 -
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT06273410 -
Clinical Performance of An Alkasite Based Restorative Material With And Without Adhesive
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT04326816 -
Restorative Treatment of Severe Tooth Wear; Direct vs Indirect
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT02119195 -
Increasing Composite Restorations Sealants
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05556551 -
Comparing Between Two Different Restoration
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT03175627 -
Clinical Performance of Posterior Composite Tooth Fillings in Adults
|
N/A | |
| Recruiting |
NCT03859284 -
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT05380973 -
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
|
N/A | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT04701320 -
Clinical Evaluation of Nano Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer in Treatment of Root Caries in Geriatric Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT02957734 -
Full Occlusal Rehabilitation for Patients With Severe Tooth Wear Using Indirect Composite Restorations
|
Phase 4 | |
| Active, not recruiting |
NCT03834636 -
Impact of Patients Risk Factors on the Longevity of Aesthetic Restorations
|
Phase 3 | |
| Not yet recruiting |
NCT05499494 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
|
N/A | |
| Completed |
NCT05180903 -
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
|
N/A |