Dental Restoration Failure Clinical Trial
Official title:
Impact of Patients Risk Factors, Type of Dental Material and Dental Technique on the Longevity of Aesthetic Dental Restorations
Verified date | February 2019 |
Source | Federal University of Pelotas |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
The objective of this double-blind randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the influence of caries risk, occlusal stress and missing teeth on anterior restorations over a 10 years follow up period. 300 teeth will be randomized according to two adhesive systems: Single Bond 2 and Single Bond Universal (3M ESPE); and two composite resins: nanoparticulated (Filtek ™ Z-350- 3M ESPE) and nanohybrid (IPS Empress Direct - Ivoclar Vivadent). The randomization will be stratified according to the risk of caries and cavity type. The primary outcomes will be longevity, annual failure rate (AFR) and the success of the restorations, and the secondary outcome will be causes for restorations' failure.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 110 |
Est. completion date | January 10, 2022 |
Est. primary completion date | January 10, 2022 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | All |
Age group | 9 Years to 70 Years |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - Patients with restorative needs in anterior teeth; - Patients able to understand and sign the informed consent form; - Patients willing to return to follow up. Exclusion Criteria: - Patients who had a need for Class III and Class IV restorations that did not involve at least 1/3 of the tooth; - Patients under orthodontic treatment; - Patients with a compromised general health condition, presenting a greater risk than ASA II, according to the ASA-PS (American Society of Anesthesiologists - Physical Status); - Patients who had no occlusal contact with an opposing tooth and/or crown; - Patient with absence of bilateral balanced occlusion; - Patient with deep caries lesions in close contact with the dental pulp and in need of expectant treatment or direct pulp capping; - Patients with post-retained need in anterior teeth. |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Brazil | Federal Univeristy of Pelotas | Pelotas | RS |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Federal University of Pelotas |
Brazil,
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Survival of the restorations | Survival of the restoration is defined as any case where the restoration remains functional in the mouth at the time of evaluation, regardless of need of small interventions, such as repair or refurbishment. The restorations were evaluated shortly after baseline and in prospective periods through a direct clinical inspection, with an explorer probe and a clinical mirror, according to the criteria for clinical evaluation of restorations proposed by the FDI (International Dental Federation) (Hickel et al., 2010), the risks of caries and occlusal stress were also evaluated again. Two trained and calibrated evaluators, unrelated to making the restorations, blinded to the type of material used, independently performed the clinical evaluations. |
Changes in the dental restorations status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years. | |
Primary | Success of the restorations | Success of the restoration is defined as any case where the restoration remains functional in the mouth at the time of evaluation, without any need of new interventions, and attending the patients demands. The restorations were evaluated shortly after baseline and in prospective periods through a direct clinical inspection, with an explorer probe and a clinical mirror, according to the criteria for clinical evaluation of restorations proposed by the FDI (International Dental Federation) (Hickel et al., 2010), the risks of caries and occlusal stress were also evaluated again. | Changes in the dental restorations status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years. | |
Secondary | Patient satisfaction with the treatment | Patient satisfaction will be recorded with FDI criteria | Changes in the patient's satisfaction status compared to baseline will be assessed yearly up to 10 years. |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03608306 -
Clinical Performance of Bioactive Restorative Material Versus Glass Hybrid Restorative in Posterior Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT06273410 -
Clinical Performance of An Alkasite Based Restorative Material With And Without Adhesive
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04326816 -
Restorative Treatment of Severe Tooth Wear; Direct vs Indirect
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT02119195 -
Increasing Composite Restorations Sealants
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05556551 -
Comparing Between Two Different Restoration
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03175627 -
Clinical Performance of Posterior Composite Tooth Fillings in Adults
|
N/A | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT03771196 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Restorative vs. RMGI in Class V: A Randomized Control Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT03859284 -
Evaluation of Adhering Flowable Composite With and Without Adhesive Vs Flowable in Cervical Lesions
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05380973 -
Clinical Performance of Two Fiber Reinforced Resin Composites Versus Nanohybrid Resin Composite in Posterior Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06441032 -
Retrospective Database Study: Survival of Cast Restorations - Restorations Made of Precious Metal vs. Non-precious Metal
|
||
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04701320 -
Clinical Evaluation of Nano Hydroxyapatite Reinforced Glass Ionomer in Treatment of Root Caries in Geriatric Patients
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT02957734 -
Full Occlusal Rehabilitation for Patients With Severe Tooth Wear Using Indirect Composite Restorations
|
Phase 4 | |
Not yet recruiting |
NCT05499494 -
Clinical Evaluation of Bioactive Injectable Resin Composite in Posterior Restorations
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05180903 -
Clinical Performance of Polyethylene Fiber Reinforced Resin Composite Restorations (Wall Papering Technique) Versus Bulk Fill Resin Composite Restorations in Endodontically Treated Teeth Will be Evaluated Using Modified USPHS Criteria.
|
N/A |