Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05615688
Other study ID # 55656
Secondary ID
Status Recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date July 14, 2022
Est. completion date May 31, 2024

Study information

Verified date August 2023
Source University of Kentucky
Contact Lina Sharab, DDS, MS, MSc
Phone 859-323-7638
Email lsh232@uky.edu
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the reported pain intensity following placement of Orthodontic separators on healthy volunteers aged 18-49 in relation to their recorded physical activity level. Hypothesis 1: The investigators hypothesize that participants with higher daily step counts and physical activity levels will report significantly less pain intensity from orthodontic separators than their less active peers following separator placement. Null hypothesis is that participants with higher daily step counts will report the same pain intensity from orthodontic separators than their less active peers following separator placement The secondary aim is to describe the course of pain, at 24 hr intervals, over the next seven days following separator placement. Hypothesis 2: The investigators hypothesize that more physically active participants will report ratings of zero pain intensity faster (sooner) than their less active peers throughout the one week study. Secondary null hypothesis is that more physically active participants will report ratings of zero pain intensity at the same rate as their less active peers throughout the one week study.


Description:

Acute pain or discomfort during orthodontic treatment is commonly reported. A study done in 2002 found that 87% of patients experienced pain after orthodontic visits. Additionally, "feeling pain" has been identified as the primary treatment concern for many patients prior to orthodontic treatment. More so, it can negatively affect patient compliance and attitude toward treatment. Numerous studies have shown that pain varies in intensity and duration among orthodontic patients. The placement of orthodontic separators is a standard procedure to facilitate placement of orthodontic bands by creating a small amount of space between posterior teeth. Separator placement reliably produces acute discomfort to patients. Pain generated from orthodontic separator placement originates in the periodontal ligament (PDL) as compression forces are applied to the PDL unequally to open a small space (less than 0.5 mm) between the teeth. This compression triggers sterile necrosis or hyalinization in some areas of the PDL, leading to acute pain. The course of pain generated from orthodontic separators typically begins 4 hours after placement, reaching highest pain intensity approximately 24 hours after placement, and continuing to decrease in intensity until returning to pre-placement baseline after seven days. Variation in reported pain intensity across orthodontic patients is of interest to any practitioner who desires to improve patient outcomes. In an attempt to enhance the orthodontist ability to understand pain and its predicting factors, researchers have examined pain from orthodontic treatment relative to patient demographics, personality traits, psychological factors, perceived need and attitude toward treatment, among others. Okeson asserts that pain is not directly related to the extent of tissue injury. Noxious stimuli originating in peripheral neurons (such is the case with separators) are subject to modulation at multiple levels through a complex central inhibitory system, where many other factors participate in decreasing or increasing the pain experience. Hence, an individual's emotional state, pain expectation and perception of control, as well as activities or distractions that will differ brain attention (Gate Control) can significantly influence the pain experience. Perceived stress, or the degree to which situations in an individual's life exceed their ability to cope, could be a good predictor of experienced pain. The Perceived Stress Scale is the most widely used screening form to evaluate perceived stress and asks subjects to recall the frequency of feeling overloaded and overwhelmed in the past month. Recently, more attention has been given to the role of physical activity (PA) in reducing pain in patients that undergo orthodontic treatment. Physical activity has been shown to be an effective mediator of acute pain tolerance and pain sensitivity, an effect known as Exercise Induced Hypoalgesia (EIH). One study reported that a 1-mile run decreased pain intensity evoked from a weight being placed on the index finger. A similar decrease in pain response to pressure applied to the finger was found in subjects in another study who performed 30 minutes of aerobic exercise. It has also been demonstrated that exercise increased dental pain thresholds in response to electrical stimulation of the pulp. The exact mechanism involved in EIH remains elusive. Still, several pathways have been implicated including activation of the endogenous opioid pathway, increased Adrenocorticotropic Hormone release, and a conditioned pain the pain perceived in another area of the body. Researchers have demonstrated that higher self-reported physical activity reduced the pain levels generated by placement of orthodontic separators when compared to patients with low physical activity. Self-reported measurements of physical activity carry limitations. The Physical Activity Questionnaire (PAQ) used in previous studies have demonstrated an only moderate correlation with direct activity observation (r=0.45), and with an activity monitoring device (r=0.57). The PAQ asks participants to report pain in the last seven days, and if given before treatment was performed, provides no data on physical activity during the week when subjects are experiencing pain. To further explore the correlation between physical activity and acute pain during orthodontic treatment, a more reliable measure of physical activity is warranted. Actigraphy sensors provide an objective measure of physical activity. Actigraphy sensors include pedometers, which count steps over a defined time interval, and accelerometers, which measure acceleration in "activity counts" that are then extrapolated to the Metabolic Equivalent of Task (METS) to measure energy expenditure. No other paper has evaluated the effect of physical activity measured with pedometers on acute pain following separators placement during orthodontic treatment. Because not all patients experience pain at the same level, it would be beneficial for clinicians to identify which patients are likely to experience more intense pain before beginning treatment. To this end, the purpose of this study is to test the effect of physical activity measured by pedometer on acute pain produced by the placement of separators.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Recruiting
Enrollment 94
Est. completion date May 31, 2024
Est. primary completion date May 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 18 Years to 49 Years
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Student, resident, or staff at the University of Kentucky - Aged 18-49 at time of enrollment in the study - Erupted permanent first and second molars with interproximal contacts - Presence of antagonist teeth in the opposite arch with no open bite - Voluntary participation in study - Access to a smartphone, tablet, or computer - Valid email address Exclusion Criteria: - Any chronic pain condition (examples include trigeminal neuralgia, migraines, fibromyalgia, arthritis, neuropathies) - Current use of pain medication (analgesics, opioids, nerve pain medications) for any condition - Clinically evident interproximal decay in the site where separators will be placed - Missing teeth, variations in tooth anatomy, existing space, and or restorations that would keep separators from being placed or retained - If you do not have access to a computer, smartphone, or tablet with internet access

Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Procedure:
Pain Intensity following Placement of Orthodontic Separators
Elastomeric separators will be placed on the mesial and distal of lower first permanent molars for a total of four separators per subject. Subjects will wear receive an activity monitor prior to placement of elastic separators and instructed to wear it 24/7 unless showering or swimming. Subjects will complete a recurrent Pain Scale Questionnaire 2-4 hrs after placement of elastics and every 24 hrs from day 2- 7.

Locations

Country Name City State
United States University of Kentucky Lexington Kentucky

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Lina Sharab

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (10)

Abu Alhaija ES, Aldaikki A, Al-Omairi MK, Al-Khateeb SN. The relationship between personality traits, pain perception and attitude toward orthodontic treatment. Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1141-9. doi: 10.2319/012710-59.1. — View Citation

Beck VJ, Farella M, Chandler NP, Kieser JA, Thomson WM. Factors associated with pain induced by orthodontic separators. J Oral Rehabil. 2014 Apr;41(4):282-8. doi: 10.1111/joor.12144. Epub 2014 Feb 1. — View Citation

Bergius M, Berggren U, Kiliaridis S. Experience of pain during an orthodontic procedure. Eur J Oral Sci. 2002 Apr;110(2):92-8. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2002.11193.x. — View Citation

Bondemark L, Fredriksson K, Ilros S. Separation effect and perception of pain and discomfort from two types of orthodontic separators. World J Orthod. 2004 Summer;5(2):172-6. — View Citation

Campos LA, Santos-Pinto A, Maroco J, Campos JADB. Pain perception in orthodontic patients: A model considering psychosocial and behavioural aspects. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2019 Aug;22(3):213-221. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12315. Epub 2019 May 15. — View Citation

Ngan P, Kess B, Wilson S. Perception of discomfort by patients undergoing orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989 Jul;96(1):47-53. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(89)90228-x. — View Citation

Rakhshan H, Rakhshan V. Pain and discomfort perceived during the initial stage of active fixed orthodontic treatment. Saudi Dent J. 2015 Apr;27(2):81-7. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2014.11.002. Epub 2015 Jan 27. — View Citation

Sandhu SS, Leckie G. Orthodontic pain trajectories in adolescents: Between-subject and within-subject variability in pain perception. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2016 Apr;149(4):491-500.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.10.020. — View Citation

Sandhu SS, Sandhu J. Orthodontic pain: an interaction between age and sex in early and middle adolescence. Angle Orthod. 2013 Nov;83(6):966-72. doi: 10.2319/030113-174.1. Epub 2013 May 24. — View Citation

Sergl HG, Klages U, Zentner A. Pain and discomfort during orthodontic treatment: causative factors and effects on compliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998 Dec;114(6):684-91. doi: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70201-x. — View Citation

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change in Pain Intensity Subjects will be given an activity monitor to wear full time following the placement of the orthodontic spacers. They will report their level of pain to on a recurrent Pain Intensity questionnaire (using a Visual Analog Scale in REDCap) at 2-4 hrs after placement, and again at 24 hour intervals for the next 7 days following separator placement. The left of the digital Visual Analog Scale will be labeled "no pain" and the right will be labeled "worst pain imaginable". REDCap assigns a value of 0 on the left side of the scale and increased to100 on the right of the scale. 7 days
Secondary Change in Proportion of patients reporting ZERO Pain over time Subjects will be given an activity monitor to wear full time following the placement of the orthodontic spacers. They will report their level of pain on a recurrent Pain Intensity questionnaire (using a Visual Analog Scale in REDCap) at 2-4 hrs after placement, and again at 24 hour intervals for the next 7 days following separator placement. The left of the digital Visual Analog Scale will be labeled "no pain" and the right will be labeled "worst pain imaginable". REDCap assigns a value of 0 on the left side of the scale and increased to100 on the right of the scale. 7 days
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04713280 - Maxillary Versus Bi-Maxillary Posterior Segments Intrusion Adult Subjects With Skeletal Open Bite N/A
Completed NCT04387578 - Evaluation of Efficiency for Three Different Aligning Archwires During Initial Orthodontic Leveling N/A
Completed NCT03991221 - Validation of Dental Malocclusion Schematic Representations for Early Orthodontic Treatment N/A
Completed NCT04381442 - Effect of Low Level Laser on Orthodontic Canine Retraction N/A
Completed NCT05614635 - Safety and Technical Performance of Plastalgin and Plastalgin Fast in Patients Requiring a Dental Impression
Recruiting NCT03714932 - Accuracy of Arch Analysis in Mixed Dentition Using Digital Models Versus Plaster Ones.
Completed NCT05094973 - Predictability of Distalization and Derotation of the Carriere Motion Appliance. N/A
Completed NCT05831722 - Changes in the Upper Airway Volume After Rapid Maxillary Expansion in Adults Using Pure Skeletal Anchorage
Active, not recruiting NCT05896618 - Evaluation of Dental and Skeletal Effect of TPA and Nance as a Space Maintainers in Children: A Prospective Clinical Trial N/A
Recruiting NCT04828096 - Retention With Three Different Bonded Retainers a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial With 5-year Follow-up N/A
Completed NCT04955860 - Evaluation of First Molar Inclinations and Transverse Arch Width in Individuals With Posterior Crossbite
Recruiting NCT06278116 - Comparison of Absorbance Values, Sensory Evaluations and Periodontal Effects of Five Different Products for Clean Aligners Cleansing N/A
Completed NCT04631419 - Effects of Flapless Laser Corticotomy in Canine Retraction N/A
Completed NCT04347018 - BRIUS Vs FFA Efficiency N/A
Completed NCT04376164 - Laser in Orthodontic Leveling and Alignment N/A
Completed NCT04266769 - Precision Orthodontics: A Comparison of Custom vs Traditional Bracket Treatment Efficiency N/A
Completed NCT05151991 - A Clinical Trial on the Failure Rates of Metallic and Ceramic Orthodontic Brackets N/A
Enrolling by invitation NCT05144555 - Periodontal Parameters in Orthodontic Patients With Stainless Steel and Ceramic Brackets. N/A
Completed NCT05939102 - Eighteen-month Orthodontic Bracket Survival Rate With the Conventional Bonding Technique Versus RMGIC and V-prep N/A
Recruiting NCT05978856 - The Accuracy of Computer Software Prediction of Soft Tissue Profile for Patients Undergoing Fixed Orthodontic Treatment