Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT03720236
Other study ID # CT-2018-05
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date November 2, 2018
Est. completion date June 19, 2020

Study information

Verified date July 2020
Source University of Santiago de Compostela
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This is a randomized triple-blind clinical trial to evaluate the behavior of peri-implant tissues (bone and soft tissues) in BLX implants loaded early or delayed and with different surgical milling protocols. To this end, 40 BLX implants with a diameter of 3.75x10 will be placed in areas of mature bone scarred after extraction. They will be divided into 2 study groups, and these in turn into two subgroups. Group A: complete milling, Group B: partial milling. Each group will be assigned with code 1: early load and code 2: deferred load. Clinical and radiological parameters will be evaluated.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 40
Est. completion date June 19, 2020
Est. primary completion date January 10, 2019
Accepts healthy volunteers Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Gender All
Age group 20 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients without systemic pathology

- Adult of age who agree to be part of the study and sign the informed consent.

- Patients smoking less than 5 cigarettes / day,

- Patients not being completely edentulous

- Unitary / multiple absences in the area posterior with or without free ends to distal, maxillary or mandibular that do not require regenerative techniques

- Area of mature bone healed at least 6 months post-extraction.

- The minimum torque for early loading will be 25 N. The placement of the implant will be mechanical up to 40 N maximum and manually finished with a surgical dynamometer.

- The placement of the abutment will be at a minimum of 25 N, in case the primary stability of the implant allows it, it will be placed at 35 N.

- The placement of the implant must always be 4 mm below the future gingival margi

Exclusion Criteria:

- Immunosuppressed patients

- Aesthetic edentulous areas of 13-23 and 33-43

- Smokers of more than 5 cigarettes

- Implants with a lower torque whose will be submerged with a screw and a protocol will be followed in 2 phases, being discarded from the study.

- Index of bleeding greater than 30%

- Patients with less than 2 mm of keratinized gingiva

- Implants with ISQ index <55

- When a margin of 1 mm safety cannot be assumed to the inferior dental nerve

Study Design


Intervention

Procedure:
Implant bed preparation protocol
This is the first surgical phase, we prepare the implant bed by using different increasing size drills.
Implant loading
This is the second phase, based on prosthetic procedures, to design the crown over the dental implant

Locations

Country Name City State
Spain Mario Pérez Sayáns Santiago De Compostela A Coruña

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Santiago de Compostela Manohay Dental SAU

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Spain, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Long-term evaluation of definitive prostheses After 6 months of loading of final ceramic restoration, we will evaluate the differences of clinical (mm of probing depth, ISQ implant stability) and radiological aspects (bone implant level in mm calculated from the neck to the actual bone level, comparing on the basal, the intermediate, and final values. 12 months
Primary Primary stability of implants and peri-implant tissues Randomly and following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the implants will be placed with the normal preparation protocol (n = 20) and with the preparation protocol with under-fresh (n = 20). We will evaluate the immediate post-surgical stability of implants and peri-implant tissues through the Ostell system, based on the resonance frequency analysis (RFA). The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the value on a scale that indicates the level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability. The acceptable stability range lies between 55-85 ISQ 12 months
Secondary Basal Peri-implant tissue level: implant stability Randomly and following the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the implants will be placed with the normal preparation protocol (n = 20) and with the preparation protocol with under-fresh (n = 20). We will load the crowns in two different groups, code 1: loading the implants before 7 days after surgery; code 2: before 8 weeks after implant surgery. We will evaluate the stability at different moments, 8 weeks, 6 months and 12 months.The implant stability quotient (ISQ) is the value on a scale that indicates the level of stability and osseointegration in dental implants. The scale ranges from 1 to 100, with higher values indicating greater stability. The acceptable stability range lies between 55-85 ISQ. ISQ values are obtained using resonance frequency analysis (RFA). 1 day
Secondary Basal Radiological Bone Implant level At the moment of placing the implant a periapical radiography will be performed, considering this measure the basal radiological bone level (distance from the neck of the implant to the most crestal level of the alveolar bone). We will calculate the difference between the basal measure and the future measurements. 1 day
Secondary Basal Peri-implant tissue level: probing depth At the moment of placing the implant, clinical variables will be evaluated: depth of probing (distance from the peri-implant margin to the most depth of the peri-implant sulcus). This will be the basal measure of the implant stability and peri-implant tissue levels. We will calculate the difference between the basal measure and the future measurements. 1 day
Secondary Radiological bone implant stability After the implantation, we´ll load the temporary prostheses in two different moments, 7 days or 8 weeks depending of the aleatory coding. We will evaluate the bone level stability at 6 weeks in both groups. The bone stability will be measured as a difference between de basal bone level and the actual one in mm. 6 weeks
Secondary Peri-implant tissue stability: probing depth After the implantation, we´ll load the temporary prostheses in two different moments, 7 days or 8 weeks depending of the aleatory coding. We will evaluate the peri-implant tissue stability by measuring the probing depth or just in case, the recession of the gingival margin. The stability will be gave by the differences between both measures, basal and actual in mm. 6 weeks
Secondary Peri-implant tissue stability: ISQ After the implantation, we´ll load the temporary prostheses in two different moments, 7 days or 8 weeks depending of the aleatory coding. We will evaluate the peri-implant tissue stability by measuring the ISQ through RFA. The stability will be gave by the differences between both measures, basal and actual. 6 weeks
Secondary Clinical tissue levels of definitive prostheses: probing depth The final or definitive prostheses will be inserted in all groups at 6 months. At this time, we will measure the clinical probing depth, comparing with previous measurements. 6 months
Secondary Clinical tissue levels of definitive prostheses: ISQ The final or definitive prostheses will be inserted in all groups at 6 months. At this time, we will measure the implant stability through RFA, comparing with previous measurements. 6 months
Secondary Radiological tissue levels of definitive prostheses: bone implant level The final or definitive prostheses will be inserted in all groups at 6 months. At this time, we will measure the bone implant level by measuring the distance from de implant neck to the most apical inserted bone, comparing simultaneously with previous measurements. 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT04370314 - Retrospective Study on Clinical Performance of Screw-retained Implant Crowns N/A
Completed NCT04620018 - Comparison of Three Antibiotic Protocols in Prevention of Infection in Dental Implant Surgery N/A
Recruiting NCT04073654 - SA Versus SOI Surfaces for Single Implant-supported Crown N/A
Completed NCT05739461 - The Effect of Triangular Neck Design on Crestal Bone Loss
Not yet recruiting NCT05973357 - The Influence of Vertical Implant Position With Immediate Provisionalization on the Marginal Bone Loss. N/A
Completed NCT06099834 - Evaluation of Osseointegration Process of Dental Implants N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT06034067 - Osseodensification Versus Conventional Drilling for Implant Site Preparation N/A
Recruiting NCT04983758 - 20-year Implant Survival in Periodontally Healthy and Compromised Patients
Completed NCT03641365 - Sleeves Versus Sleeveless Template N/A
Completed NCT05724706 - An Evaluation of Salivary Oxidant and Antioxidant Levels in Peri-implant Health and Disease
Completed NCT04270396 - Early and Late Implant Failure
Recruiting NCT06123221 - SINUS FLOOR WITH OSSEODENSIFICATION OR LATERAL WINDOW N/A
Completed NCT05060055 - Digital Assessment at Peri-implant Tissues After Immediate Implants With Customized Healing Abutments and Connective Tissue Grafts N/A
Recruiting NCT04429373 - Effect of Platelet-rich Plasm (PRF) on Two-implant Mandibular Overdenture: a Split Mouth N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT03741036 - Immediate Implant Placement With Provisionalization Using Different Bone Grafts as a Space Filling Material in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone N/A
Completed NCT02625597 - Assessment of the Effects of Different Implant Abutment Occluding Materials on Dental Implant Health Parameters and Microbiology N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04518020 - Single Crown Supported by Short Implant Versus Standard Implant in Conjunction With Maxillary Sinus Floor Augmentation. N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT06099717 - Clinical Performance of Dual-cantilevered Single-implant Bridge N/A
Completed NCT06294171 - Efficacy of Modified Piezosurgery Alveolar Bone Cut With Osseodensification Drills in Expanding Narrow Alveolar Bone N/A
Withdrawn NCT03715439 - Evaluation of Dental Implants Placed in Preserved and Non-preserved Post-extraction Ridges

External Links