View clinical trials related to Dental Implant Failed.
Filter by:The study aims to assess the efficacy of Calprotectin and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen levels in crevicular fluid as a biomarker in patients with peri-implantitis.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the soft-tissue profile around a single-tooth implant in the anterior maxilla utilizing the PES after implant uncovering using "M" flap versus I-shaped incision.The primary objective is evaluation of esthetic outcomes around implant using PES. Hypothesis: The use of I-shaped incision exposure technique will result in better esthetic outcomes.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare clinical data and implant stability of immediately loaded TSIII Osstem implants with Sandblasted and Acid-etched (SA) surface versus implants with SA surface modified with pH buffering agent for the rehabilitation of single implant-supported crown.
In this retrospective study, approximately 60 patients treated with 6mm short implants (Straumann, SLA (sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched surface), SLActive (sandblasted, large-grit, acid-etched, hydrophilic surface), 4.1 or 4.8 mm in diameter) will be followed for 4.5-18.2 years. Clinical and radiographic parameters will be assessed in a follow-up examination.
This is a randomized, single-blind, split-mouth clinical trial to evaluate the performance of peri-implant tissues (bone and soft tissues) in conventionally loaded Galimplant implants, using a classic multi-position, anti-rotational abutment, comparing it to the new multi-abutment aesthetic slim anti-rotational placed both at the time of the implant surgery. To this end, 80 Galimplant implants with a diameter of 4 mm and 10 mm in length will be placed in areas of mature scarred post-extraction bone. Patients be divided into 2 study groups, group C: straight pillar; Group T: Slim pillar. The bone and clinical radiological stability of the peri-implant tissues will be evaluated at 6 weeks post-surgery and at 6-12 months post-prosthetic loading.
compare autogenous bone graft, xenograft and nanohydroxyapatite in immediate implant w placement in maxillary esthetic zone with provisionalization
This is a randomized triple-blind clinical trial to evaluate the behavior of peri-implant tissues (bone and soft tissues) in BLX implants loaded early or delayed and with different surgical milling protocols. To this end, 40 BLX implants with a diameter of 3.75x10 will be placed in areas of mature bone scarred after extraction. They will be divided into 2 study groups, and these in turn into two subgroups. Group A: complete milling, Group B: partial milling. Each group will be assigned with code 1: early load and code 2: deferred load. Clinical and radiological parameters will be evaluated.
A prospective study to evaluate and compare implants placed in preserved versus non-preserved extraction sockets using L-PRF (Leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin) after 1, 3 and 5 years.
To compare virtual planning accuracy of computer-assisted template-based implant placement using CAD/CAM stereolithographic surgical templates with or without metallic sleeves.Furthermore to compare open versus closed holes in case of sleeveless templates. Any partially edentulous patients requiring at least one implant to be planed according to a computer-assisted template-based protocol were enrolled. Patients were randomised according to a parallel group design into two arms: surgical template with or without metallic sleeves. Three deviation parameters (angular, horizontal, vertical) were defined to evaluate the discrepancy between the planned and placed implant positions.
This study designed as a randomized controlled split-mouth trial will be conducted at the Dental Clinic of the University of Valencia. The aim will be to assess differences in clinical, radiological and microbiological outcomes between implants with 2 different connections: internal hexagon and conical connection. Following the premises, to minimize the bias related to prosthetic phase and maximize the effect of connections on MBL changes, a 1abutment-1time protocol will be used. The study hypothesis is that there will be no statistically significant differences between both implant connections.