Clinical Trials Logo

Dental Implant Failed clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Dental Implant Failed.

Filter by:
  • Not yet recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06240416 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Implant Failed

Autogenous Particles Harvesting During Implant Surgery

Start date: March 15, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim was to compare the osteoblast activity and osteogenic potential of autogenous bone particles harvested using three different techniques, determine the most advantageous method of collecting autogenous bone particles. Bone particles were harvested during dental implant surgery using low-speed drilling and high speed drilling. After the osteoblasts were cultured, cell proliferation, migration, mineralization, transcription of osteogenesis-related genes, secretion of osteogenesis-related proteins, and osteoinductive protein content in the bone particle matrix were evaluated

NCT ID: NCT06099717 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Implant Failed

Clinical Performance of Dual-cantilevered Single-implant Bridge

T-bridge
Start date: June 30, 2024
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aims to evaluate the clinical performance (implant and prosthetic survival/ success rates) of a novel implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis design: the dual-cantilevered single implant bridge (T-Bridge) made out of monolithic zirconia bonded to a titanium base abutment (Variobase abutments)

NCT ID: NCT05973357 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Implant Failed

The Influence of Vertical Implant Position With Immediate Provisionalization on the Marginal Bone Loss.

Start date: September 20, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Multiple clinical studies have established high survival rates and tremendous predictability of dental implant treatment. However, a pleasant esthetic outcome is the patient's primary expectation regarding implants in the esthetic zone and several esthetic factors have been evaluated to contribute to an esthetic appearance. Among these, the midfacial soft tissue level is considered to be one of the most important factors; Cosyn and co-workers reported that among factors including soft tissue phenotype, the midfacial recession was associated with the position of the implant . Therefore, subcrestal implant placement has been advocated as it has been associated with the reduction of crestal bone loss in cases with decreased soft tissue thickness. If the vertical soft tissues on the crest of the alveolar ridge are 2 mm or less at the time of implant placement, implants will undergo unavoidable bone resorption by establishing sufficient biologic protection. Another option was proposed by Linkevicius et al, who introduced the subcrestal implant placement as a method to accommodate the problem of thin soft tissues. Research question: Does the placement of delayed implants with different vertical depth affect the marginal bone loss with immediate provisionalization?

NCT ID: NCT04177732 Not yet recruiting - Peri-Implantitis Clinical Trials

Assessment of Efficacy of Calprotectin and Cross-linked N-telopeptides

Start date: December 10, 2019
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study aims to assess the efficacy of Calprotectin and cross-linked N-telopeptides of type I collagen levels in crevicular fluid as a biomarker in patients with peri-implantitis.

NCT ID: NCT03741036 Not yet recruiting - Clinical trials for Dental Implant Failed

Immediate Implant Placement With Provisionalization Using Different Bone Grafts as a Space Filling Material in the Maxillary Esthetic Zone

Start date: November 27, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

compare autogenous bone graft, xenograft and nanohydroxyapatite in immediate implant w placement in maxillary esthetic zone with provisionalization